1
General Discussion / Re: Official "Goodbye cRPG" Thread
« on: July 31, 2016, 08:08:47 pm »I've been quitting cRPG at least a few times a week over the last few years.The key to success is to never give up. Keep on quitting bro.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I've been quitting cRPG at least a few times a week over the last few years.The key to success is to never give up. Keep on quitting bro.
By I quit, i meant i don't care about what happens on map. I will still apply for battles if I have time, cause I find them fun.
I'm sorry buddy, but you think that you are rekt for years because UIF is stronger, no fairplay and chadz is evil, but brutal truth is that you' are classic morons deprived of ability to learn from your own mistakes ... I'm going back to my beloved warships, fuck this shit...pfffSorry for double-post, but I always fought on UIF, DRZ , Greys side since I can remember. Only this strat we wanted to help to keep strat alive, but didn't work out well. So I don't know why you are speaking without background knownledge here Harpag.
people keep crying. OMG
is it our problem if ur guys attack at 3 pm?
also what would be the difference if u would have a full roster.
as long as varadin and the archers show up u are fucked anyway.
Because it would overwrite alt+0241; can only memorize one of these, and 0241 is actually useful
Im sure that if the leaders of the UIF would step down, the minions of the UIF would rise up and try their own ideas for strat, start smaller factions (like polanie did) and try to make it on their own in strat.
So, once strat gets interessting again, once the small clans actually can try out the game, perhaps even guys that havent played strat at all, or perhaps have only been trading or grinding for some major power - suddenly they can think "I am gonna get me a fief, and see what I can do with it".
Battles wouldnt be plated ones, they would be smaller, diplomacy would matter again and EU would turn more into NA in many ways - which would be better for strat overall.
And to let this happen, by itself - we just need to break the big blocks up and let new leaders come forth that have the energy and the will to make new alliances and enemies.
Rosters would come with it, 2 months ago there was more people than slots in the roster cause strat was still interessting - it isnt anymore
NoNo what? There was no question in the topic
I know how you feel, I will fight with you this afternoon and give you more chance.Thanks
Still, the battles you talk about were balanced, even slight roster advantage for attack. You speak of Khudan and Ichamur last sieges, right? 25v20 and 15v10 is fair. What would you have said if UIF had really applied in defense and 50 people were staring down at you? Everything is up to the people, if they want something bad enough they will get it. You can never die on strategus, only lose hope.I would be happy and i would enjoy the battle if both rosters were full. And yeah 50 vs 15 would suck, for both sides truly.