91
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Anyone whining about ranged clearly hasn't played native.
I have played on eu alot when it had high population and sry I dont see where you are coming from. And if ranged was such a big population and the supposed reason eu is dead did they run themselves off too?
Last week in Scandinavia:
Young Swedish girl described as a 'minor' (a child of 14 or below, one source says she was 10 years old) from Östervåla was raped Thursday by three men in a cemetery in broad daylight on her way home from school. 'No person has been arrested but we have received a good description of the perpetrators. We do not want to publish it in the media', says police.
Two Afghans arrested for the rape of two 14-year old Danish girls in the toilets in a shopping center in Esbjerg in March. Also during the day.
Wednesday was the commemoration of the 7 year anniversary of the suicide of a 14-year old Norwegian girl. Two weeks before her Christian Confirmation she was lured from a music festival by an African man and raped. Two other Africans came by and she thought they would help her - instead they joined in the rape, holding her down while taking turns raping her. Following the incident she got increasingly depressed and couldn't sleep. Two weeks after her Confirmation, traditionally a happy day of celebration for Scandinavian girls, she took her own life.
This is a sad reminder of Angelica Wiktor, a Swedish woman who commited suicide in March last year after being raped by an immigrant and the court closing her case due to 'lack of evidence'. The woman chose to end her life, feeling devastated in the aftermath of the violent rape and the failure of the state to prosecute the perpetrator.
The rape of the 'minor' in Sweden is hardly the only rape of a Swedish girl by immigrant men in Sweden last week - just the only one that made it to the newspapers - if we go by the testimony of police veteran of 47 years Peter Springare of Örebro Police of what a 'normal' week looks like in these days of multicultural utopia (note this is from only one municipality out of 290 Swedish municipalities in total, God knows how these numbers look nationwide):
Springare also said he was due to retire soon and thus no longer feared disciplinary action from his superiors for disobeying their orders and raising the issue.
All drawbacks are apparent to anyone who owns armor Salad. Because people who own it seek to reenact as much as they can. They train in it, fight in it, test it to its limits. They'd know far better than you would
No see the actual people who lived through the time period and used the things in war were just misguided. Fat american academics with a bone to pick have proven scientifically that plate armor was useless.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_of_the_Thirty
"After several hours of fighting there were four dead on the French side and two on the English side. Both sides were exhausted and agreed to a break for refreshments and bandaging of injuries. After the battle resumed, the English leader Bemborough was wounded and then killed, apparently by du Bois. At this point the English faction formed a tight defensive body, which the French repeatedly attacked. A German soldier called Croquart is said to have displayed the greatest prowess in rallying the Anglo-Breton defence"
Wow I'm sure there's absolutely no other contemporary accounts of armor in battle. Fighting for hours, literally impossible man, not like the use of armor in war stretches back to fucking antiquity. That's some powerful drugs you're on Salad.
'medieval historic community' my ass
If we take a look at the armor they used you can immediately see it wasn't authentic. Those were scientists, who knew their stuff when it came down to measuring. They didn't know jack shit about armors, and it's easy to see
First off, they already said they were using armors that weigh 50 kilos. Which is bollocks, because no combat armor ever found has weighed 50 kilos. They have weighed around 25. That's half
Second off, they said that it was uncomfortable to wear.
Which also means tat the armor was completely wrong, because armor was made to be comfortable. People who own authentic armor state it to be comfortable to wear, move and fight in.
So who am I gonna believe? A bunch of scientists whit no expertise in the medieval armors, or the worlds leading armor expert Tobias Capwell and what he is saying? I think I'm gonna go with the armor expert
If the armour in either the test or the hobbyists isnt exactly identical in weight, shape and design to the armour used historically then it proves nothing one way or the other.
And that study was the dumbest study I've seen to date.
They used armor which was neither well districuted, too heavy for the user, and basically out all that fucking weight on the shoulders and the legs. Ofc you'd get tired
I'm tired of arguing with you. I know of people who own armor, and who say that it's no issue to wear is for extended periods of time. I'm gonna believe that far more than I'm gonna believe some random guy on the internet.
so you are telling us that it doesnt matter if a fighter uses armor or not? it will still get tired after few minutes? Then i would gladily put some armor on, i prefer to be tired and protected rather than tired and unprotected
How much do you think the average modern infantryman carries? And that is even more cumbersome than armor would've been because of the weight distribution.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
What HEMA people fighting in plate armor? HEMA is unarmored.
If you mean other guys, not many people have authentic plate armor around. They also fight with the visors down for safety reasons, which is not historical
And believe me, a visor up makes all the difference
Yes, the knights played a big role in Agincourt. And the french knights were not 'dying of heat exhaustion', instead they stupidly charged the well entrenched positions of the english, through muddy ground. That's a death trap whether you wear armor or not. And the archers were not the only ones there, surprise. The English dismounted knights helped a fair bit.
1. Stop saying 30-60. It's 25-30 at max. And no, it won't kill you. People fall of horses all the time in jousting armor, which is quite a bit heavier. They're fine.
2. Yes, I totally agree. That is, with the visor down. Which was likely only done in lance charges and when getting shot by arrows. Otherwise, the visors were up.
3. Not enough for it to matter over the protection you get
4. Not really. In fact, the armor says "Don't kill me, I have lots of money. Ransom me!" Sure, a priority target. But for other reasons. And that still doesn't mean they'd actually be able to do anything to you. Especially if they were peasants. Wouldn't stand a chance.
5. No it doesn't
6.You don't march with armor on, you march with the armor off. Then you put the armor on, and go to battle. And even if you did march with it on for whatever reason, it would be fine. Just ask anyone who owns an authentic set. An authentic set, not a cheap badly made one.
Full plate fell out of use because armies got centralized, not because it was unpractical. When the state started to hold a regular army which got paid, and which had the profession of being soldiers, they realized that they could really not afford to give people armor. So what they did was give people guns instead. Because guns were cheap and required minimal training. Cuirassiers, which were the wealthy bunch, still wore bulletproof breastplates.
I'd really like to take a look of those accounts of yours.
Sure, you will get exhausted over time, but so will you without wearing armor. And if you're gonna get exhausted anyway, might as well do it boing protected from 99% of the hits you will receive. And it really isn't 30kg +, it's more like 30kg -
Especially if you count the various mercenaries who would only use parts of a full plate harness.
The english knights would like to differ about that horseback thingy. During the Hundred Years War, they mostly fought on foot. And know what? Their armor was heavier than most around during that time. History doesn't agree with you