Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Banok

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 149
46
Total War Series / Re: Total War Hammer
« on: June 04, 2016, 01:32:55 pm »
When Chaos spawns / you get the whole introduction animation that they've emerged, one Chaos army(not main Chaos army but a tribe) spawns around the water next to the Greenskin area and take 1 turn to get on land. They got two full armies with strong troops, so they are a threat to pretty much every nation.

This fuck'd me over in so many ways because I wasn't expecting it and all my armies were like around 10 turns away. Decided to reload a prev save and stack armies near their spawnpoint until they arrived and wiped them out in two turns.

yeah I know, 4 stacks spawned there on my legendary dwarf campaign, but they are full of weak units. I sent 1 general with lightning strike and he wiped them all straight away.

Just wiped choas on my legendary empire campaign - I thought choas would be far stronger from what I saw in my dwarf/vamp campaigns, I remember seing 10 stacks in one province and they wiped all humans factions bar 1 or 2. I guess there is a large degree of randomness to it.

or maybe its just because I hunted down the choas armies where if they survive to the next wave they add up or something? I guess the raze growth too allows them to multiply if left unchecked.

But nothing makes units route as quickly as a good proper welcome with Flamethrowers!

didn't make 1 irondrake in my campaign, tried them in custom... that useless range and low lethality. all the high end dwarf units are terrible. I thought ironbreakers would be nice, they aren't really much on longbeards, they friendly fire and take twice as long to recruit. hammerers aren't good, they have high attack low defense but too slow to be flankers which just makes them frontline units that die lots. slayers... worst unit in the game. gryos, probably useful since you don't get cav but considering the tech you need... I made 2 for a quest.

quarrellers are better than thunderers because they shoot over your men, although thunderers on the flanks are worth it if micro'd well into line of sight positons.  great weapons are imo never worth trading for shields, because even vs choas/vampires you want to shields to reduce friendly fire from your flanking missiles, and defense is just better on dwarf infantry.

Its just kinda sad that dwarves are just best sticking to early units for whole game, meanwhile empire's high end units are completely insane.

47
Total War Series / Re: Total War Hammer
« on: June 02, 2016, 07:38:14 pm »
What I wonder is how expanded map/additional races will work with the chaos end game thing.

already chaos aren't as threatening to dwarves/orcs due to distance. but if we have elves or whatever on other side of map will there be a new end game mechanic for them?

wiping choas is grindy as hell, but without some sort of realmdivide or invasion campaigns just get stale.

48
Total War Series / Re: Total War Hammer
« on: June 01, 2016, 06:45:28 am »
So im 175 turns on legendary dwarf campaign, after long slog of wiping out all choas completely, I have all long victory conditions why haven't I won?

Then I see "clear all grudges", and I have a grudge where I have to get engineer to level 15, current level 0. Fuck, theres not enough enemies left to kill to get that much exp, its just me owning every dwarf/orc territory and some surviving human factions....  :(

49
Total War Series / Re: Total War Hammer
« on: May 31, 2016, 05:19:47 pm »
late to post because I've been playing the game so much. TLDR great game worth the money, not a warhammer fan but setting is actually alot of fun.

I watched mrsmartdonkey and a bit of legendoftotalwar play the game on legendary the weekend before it came out, and thought it looked way too easy but I decided to buy it anyway. I was a big fan of legendary shogun 2 campaigns, where if you start central and get ganged up you just have to start again. And legendary difficulty in rome 2 and attila has always been a cakewalk for me, so I was half expecting totalhammer to be even easier.

but then when I got the game, I tried every faction on legendary and got my ass pounded by the AI so hard. I was really happy about this, I think totalhammer might be the hardest in the series yet on legendary. Its back to shogun 2 legendary with that xcom ironman feel where if you are unlucky with other factions you might simply lose no matter what.

Although after I put in more hours I eventually figured out how to win all factions - apart from empire! I've only played legendary and I assume empire is one of the easiest factions on lower difficulty but on legendary you can't get any agreements out of your nieghbours which is how the faction is designed, and I haven't figured out how to expand yet.

So the easiest faction starts for me where surprisingly greenskins and vampire lords, I think I beat both on my 2nd attempt. If you replay enough campaigns on legendary you will realise that there is actually always alot of luck involved though as where other factions expand and who they war dec can change everything. I've had some REALLY fun campaigns so far, I could probably gush about my experiences for pages...

If you are like me and enjoy out figuring out strats to beat the game yourself consider this a spoiler warning.

(click to show/hide)

So onto some negatives. Main one is I cannot record my experiences because the game performance is complete trash. The game is supposed to look and run better than attila, for me it is the opposite. This is probably because my graphics card was new enough to get lastest driver for attila, but has since been legacy'd and cannot get new driver for totalhammer. Off my head I on normallish settings rome 2 is ~60fps, attila is ~40fps, totalhammer is like ~20-30. I had to set everything to lowest so I could actually play the big multiple stack battles.

I'm at 60 hours now, still got empire to do but I think I won't put as many hours into totalhammer compared to previous total war games. The game is definitely more focused on quality than the quantity of med2/rome 2/attila in terms of factions and gamemap. We knew already warhammer would focus on having very different factions, but I don't see why they couldn't have just made multiple playable factions within each race.

I thought quest system would be the excuse, but this the "quest system" imo is barely even worth mentioning. Apart from like 1 lame battle the are mostly just like missions from all the previous total war games. All the gear makes it more RPG but otherwise I still think shogun 2 had the best generals. Having generals be so strong and only 1 unit has alot of serious gameplay implications, since they have too small hitbox for projectiles and such.

haha written so much didn't even talk about other factions. making myself stop here. grats if you read this far.

50
... and all the other things floating around out there / Re: Doom
« on: May 22, 2016, 03:56:00 pm »
Sorry I just blame consoles when pc multiplayer games having short rounds and long matching bullshit between rounds, like in overwatch.

51
... and all the other things floating around out there / Re: Doom
« on: May 17, 2016, 11:37:35 pm »
Seems it's a trend these days with multiplayer games, way too much fucking waiting. The least they could do is make the matches last longer if they insist on making the players wait two decades.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

52
Total War Series / Re: Total War Hammer
« on: May 17, 2016, 02:41:14 pm »
don't tell me you wouldn't be interested ;)

gunpowder total war games bore me.

Don't mind a limited gunpowder units like in shogun 2 main campaign, and medieval 2. but empire, napoleon, FotS, all completely boring to me. line men up and shoot at each other = snooze. even worse in ww1 since trenchs and cavalry gets shred by machine guns.

53
sounds like its going to be more historical than I expected, although my expectations were pretty dam low.


54
at least I sorta get why people give attention to the twitch D.Va's

what I will never understand is why the any of the big male channels are nearly so big. the are mostly really anoying and unremarkable nerds sometimes genuinely unlikeable people that I wouldn't even want to hang out with, and yet their huge sad desperate fanbase think of them as celebrities and want to give them money just to be acknowledged by them in the stream chat.

paying to be acknowledged by some hot female streamer, is in comparison very easy to sympathise with.

the only streamer I followed was theviper because he is literally a god at aoe2, he will be playing vs other best players in the world while talking to chat, alt tabbing to change music. and still out playing peoples APM/strategy.

55
Total War Series / Re: Total War Hammer
« on: May 10, 2016, 01:14:38 pm »
I realised other day, even best case scenario and the game is really really good, while they may be much more diverse there is only 4 campaigns. And the campaign map is really not that big. choas is a 5th faction I forgot about but I expect them to be like huns and a complete cakewalk.

So once I beat each one, and I expect them all to be very easy for me. thats going to be seriously not many hours compared to what I put into previous TW titles, even dlc like age of charlemagne had more hours for me since I pretty much played every faction. I recently got back into medieval 2, which felt horribly dated at first but Ive put in like 300 hours, even vanilla holds up as one of the best  main campaigns and the lotr mod is ace.

with other games genres I much prefer the quality over quantity, but I'm not sure I do when it comes to TW ;O

56
except open beta is still going?

I was playing today but serious rubberbanding, unplayable most games even tho pingtest is fine.

still on fence about buying this game, especially when they could charge for future heroes or whatever. orange box was £20 back in the day.

57
I get that bastion is mostly a destroyer of noobs, but I am a noob ;)

Ive been playing with my cousin, and probably got put in a higher skill bracket cause hes high level and a big TF2 player, and I subsequently got raped pretty much every map.

hes like "finally a game we both play", so now I'm guilt tripped into buying this game but its a good product.

It's just I haven't really been that into competitive online games for like 2 years now. I kinda like chillin with some total war, its almost like I'm getting old.

58
Ive never found bastion hard to fight at all, just need someone to flank him. Genji deals with him very well too, just parry tank his firing and he sudokus. Usually theres one character in the team that can deal with him easily.

We tried 6 man soldier team because self heals and decent damage. Didnt work so well tho, but was fun.

some maps have literally 1 choke point.

genji CAN counter, genji is not a reliable counter thought. because its a skill match up, a smart bastion can just wait for genji to parry then shoot him in the face afterwards.

59
Still think bastion is op. I can counter him in most positions by going roadkill, but being forced to counterpick isn't fun. the dps is simply too high in turrent mode, especially at long range. and the ulti is one of the easiest "Q of the match".

My bad then, sounded pretty aussie to me, but then again it is quite awful.

I just find it funny. I bet most non british people would instantly think it was british.

60
wow ww1 is actually pretty cool.

I wouldn't have been surprised if they just continued to chase cod and do near future/current.


still, it probably just wont be worth buying. since to you basically have to pay 100 quid for the entire game now in this series. and it definitely wont put in close to the amount of hours I will in squad.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 149