So he's gonna get impeached?
So he's gonna get impeached?Why would he? He's done nothing to warrant it.
Why would he? He's done nothing to warrant it.
I don't think you understand just how biased the media is against Trump
Oh comon, guy is an idiot. He accuses Obama of wiretapping him on twitter without any proof, that's how president of USA should act?He should have provided proof on Twitter? Why? It was actually proven that Trump was "wiretapped" and the media dropped the story that instant.
Though he's the most honest liar, I'll give him that.
It was actually proven that Trump was "wiretapped"
Really? Proven? By whom? And if that's true, then why there's no investigation against Obama?Admitted by the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Nunes. There's no investigation because it wasn't illegal, obviously. Obama wouldn't get people to illegally wiretap anyone. He doesn't need to.
(click to show/hide)
Even if what you say is true, do you really think that dropping such information on twitter, without showing any proof, is appropriate way of communicating by the president? And looks like he made another step in a way to the impeachment. He just doesn't have the faintest idea what he's supposed to do and what does it mean to act like a president. Like with this crisis with North Korea and Japan Prime Minister.Sure, why wouldn't it be? When the media is biased as much as it is against him, it's great that he can talk straight to the people. There is no such thing as "act like a president." Where does it say that presidents have to fake their personalities?
Would that make your uncle a good President?
If he faded back into obscurity I'd probably appreciate his jokes and being a cool dude a little more.
There is no such thing as "act like a president."
whenever you see him he's always cracking jokes and being a cool dude.
you dont need falsehoods to prove he's an idiot.
There's not? Really? Don't you think there're some standards that president should maintain? Like being responsible for what he says and don't accuse former president without showing any proof?
Trump? Cool dude? You have to be kidding me.
Trump? Cool dude? You have to be kidding me.
Well, looks like for some people being an idiot is cool.
Trump? Cool dude? You have to be kidding me.
Yeah, sure.
There's not? Really? Don't you think there're some standards that president should maintain? Like being responsible for what he says and don't accuse former president without showing any proof?Nope. I don't expect presidents to fake how they act so I can pretend they're perfect human beings. And I don't see what the issue with accusing the former president is when the accusation's true. Why would he need to show proof? Why does he owe that to you? He doesn't.
So shitting on Trump makes you an SJW. Pretty convenient. Just like being against the Turkish government transforms you into a terrorist. Or hating on Russia identifies you as a facist. Or having a problem with the Israeli leader turns you into an anti-semite. Or, on the other end of the spectrum, not agreeing with the refugee agenda makes you a facist(non-russian definition) again.
It's an easy life in the Age of Simple Truths.
refugee crimes though.
Breitbart? Seriously?Nice ad hominem you got there. How about you focus on the facts on the site?
You complain about media propaganda and post media propaganda as source? :lol:
Nice ad hominem you got there. How about you focus on the facts on the site?Those are - if anything - highly questionable since Breitbart is commonly known for spreading straight out lies.
About the content, I struggled to find any other sources about this new development. Until I realised this isnt a new development, he made this statement to that general question at the start of this month a good week before other developments. It came up at least a week ago on BBC news and other online stuff I read in relation to him being fired, not sure why Breitbart is reporting it now as if he's responding to the more recent allegations...Uh, what is your point, exactly? The alleged "influence" happened before he testified under oath that there had been no such influence. Did you really think the conversation took place one day before Comey was fired? You do realize Flynn was fired February 13? And that the alleged influence happened in February? And that this month is May? And that Comey testified in May -- which is after February?
Those are - if anything - highly questionable since Breitbart is commonly known for spreading straight out lies.Your inability to use Google to find other sources for his statement is the fault of your low IQ, not anyone else's. But, I am kind and merciful, and believe the mentally challenged should be helped when possible, so I'll provide you with another source: http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1705/03/wolf.02.html
So, please be so kind and shove your ad hominem up your depressive, leeching ass. :)
"But I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal.
“It’s not happened in my experience,” Comey said."
Breitbart certainly skews things a lot and missrepresents things but doesn't spread outright lies"It´s not a lie, it´s just bent truth"
I will eat my words if Trump can actually take some decisive action about North Korea. His whole platform was about not being afraid to break a few eggs, but so far the response to North Korea has been everything this forum likes to meme about the West's response to an islamist attack:Or so you think, buddy. If only you had access to the same high level sources as me your mind would be blown. What you're seeing is the set up, the pieces are being moved into place, and it'll be a check mate after 1 move when the game begins...
- Condemn north
- Talk about the same sanctions that are already in place
- Wait for next missile test
With one key difference - there is a time constraint here. At the point where North Korea has multiple armed missiles able to consistently reach the US, it will be too late to take preemptive action against them.
Surely the one good thing about having a President like Trump, is that you'd think he wouldn't pussy-foot around a potential military threat to the US like this. But so far he has done nothing special in the face of this threat that you couldnt imagine any of his predecessors doing. THAAD was a nice gesture but only seems to have provoked matters and at this rate wont even be operational before North Korea has tested everything it needs, it's also not been proven to work in practice. He has until North Korea completes their ICBM project to prove he's not an Obama-clone with a loud mouth.
Get a job.Become a slave. Oh wait, you're already one. LMAO!