cRPG

Off Topic => General Off Topic => Topic started by: LordBerenger on July 07, 2016, 01:11:57 pm

Title: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 07, 2016, 01:11:57 pm
In a couple of days on Saturday it's happening. Jon Jones is out and now it's gonna be Brock Lesnar vs Mark Hunt for the main event. Still a pretty cool show even without the Jones vs DC LHW fight. Prelims are sick and still some nice matches overall.

Still hypeeeeee


Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 07, 2016, 01:49:11 pm
Would have been such an amazing card if not for Jones' shittery. Still good, but that was the main event, literally and figuratively.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Casul on July 07, 2016, 01:56:56 pm
Brock Lesnar is the worst roids abusing strawberry head I have ever seen ,I hope he gets beaten the shit out of his already broken body. Fucking disgusting piece of shit
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 07, 2016, 02:03:44 pm
Why do you care if he uses roids?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Casul on July 07, 2016, 02:38:42 pm
Because it is the pussy way and its cheating?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 07, 2016, 03:36:28 pm
"Cheating"

Yes, it's against some stupid UFC rules, so what. The better fighter will still win. "B-b-b-but he used steroids", so what, he still beat your ass, not an excuse.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Paul on July 07, 2016, 03:37:54 pm
One can at least enjoy the irony.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 07, 2016, 03:39:50 pm
But can two enjoy it? What about three? Would four be pushing it?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Casul on July 07, 2016, 03:57:04 pm
The better fighter will still win.

"better".

The other one should fight with knifes and then claim to be better.

But sadly it would be against some stupid UFC rules  :?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 07, 2016, 04:20:48 pm
"better".

The other one should fight with knifes and then claim to be better.

But sadly it would be against some stupid UFC rules  :?
Knives*
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 07, 2016, 04:23:32 pm
Would have been such an amazing card if not for Jones' shittery. Still good, but that was the main event, literally and figuratively.

Pretty funny to see so many fall for the bad boy image of Jones though and supporting him through and through and shitting on DC as one could see in past press conferences.

Brb doing coke, brb getting pulled over for a DUI with 2 young women in my car and condoms while my wife and daughter is at home, BRB getting popped for possibly PEDs, BRB eyepoking everyone, BRB being a douchebag, BRB almost killing a pregnant woman while running over her with my car while being high on weed.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 07, 2016, 04:26:11 pm
"Cheating"

Yes, it's against some stupid UFC rules, so what. The better fighter will still win. "B-b-b-but he used steroids", so what, he still beat your ass, not an excuse.

Yeah that's why performance enhancing drugs are banned in every sport, because they make no difference in performance.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leshma on July 07, 2016, 04:48:22 pm
I wouldn't exactly call UFC a sport, but each to his own I guess.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 07, 2016, 04:51:10 pm
I wouldn't exactly call UFC a sport, but each to his own I guess.

Because UFC is an organization. MMA is a sport. (Mixed Martial Arts)
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leesin on July 07, 2016, 11:03:53 pm
I wouldn't exactly call UFC a sport, but each to his own I guess.

MMA is a Sport
Sport = "an activity involving physical exertion and/or skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment."

Fight sports just so happen to have real world uses too.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leshma on July 07, 2016, 11:06:08 pm
Breeding dogs to fight till death someone may consider as sport as well. I hold myself above those activities, if you know what I mean.

Edit: It also further cements this place as utter shithole. No one is talking about gentlemanly sport like tennis even tho Wimbledon is still going on yet everyone jumps the wagon when it comes to discussing MMA and UFC.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 08, 2016, 01:05:29 am
Breedings dogs to fight till death someone may consider as sport as well. I hold myself above those activities, if you know what I mean.

Edit: It also further cements this place as utter shithole. No one is talking about gentlemanly sport like tennis even tho Wimbledon is still going on yet everyone jumps the wagon when it comes to discussing MMA and UFC.

Most ppl here are talking about Soccer tbh.


Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Falka on July 08, 2016, 01:49:09 am
Edit: It also further cements this place as utter shithole. No one is talking about gentlemanly sport like tennis even tho Wimbledon is still going on yet everyone jumps the wagon when it comes to discussing MMA and UFC.

I blame americunts for the rising popularity of this shit. Which only shows that we didn't move too far away from our ancestors who enjoyed gladiator fights.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


"Sport".
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leshma on July 08, 2016, 01:50:38 am
Well soccer is still most popular sport. UFC is more ghetto youth thing and for those who mimic that lifestyle, not really popular among normal folks.

This forum is big on stuff like: history (kinda obvious why), nationalism, gaming (duh), firearms (na is dead so thats fixed), violence (ufc among other stuff), bodybuilding, naked chicks. Kinda like bb forum. What is worrying, I'm 30, some are older and most of 16-18 year olds should be 23-24 by now. It is time to at least consider growing up a bit. I know we do everything later in life but still, if my bro who was big into that shit could change into full time dad by 34 then anyone can.

Grown up dude, with shades of gray acting like teenager and wearing tracksuit, acting tough while having no stable job or his own family generally is producing only one sentiment in people. No it is not envy. It's pity.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 08, 2016, 06:45:30 am
Yeah that's why performance enhancing drugs are banned in every sport, because they make no difference in performance.
hurr durr reading comprehension is difficult
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Falka on July 08, 2016, 09:11:36 am
Well soccer is still most popular sport. UFC is more ghetto youth thing and for those who mimic that lifestyle, not really popular among normal folks.

Dunno, my cousin who's 21 and his friends from uni (not exactly a ghetto types) seem to be fans of it. From what I've heard it also becomes more and more popular in tv.

As for the forum, I think that without language barrier retardation of this site would be much more unbearable to me. These forums remind me a lot of football forum I followed a few years ago, in big part populated by the same types of people as here. But here it's refreashing to see things from a different perspectives.

Grown up dude, with shades of gray acting like teenager and wearing tracksuit, acting tough while having no stable job or his own family

Yes, no, no, no, no, no, yes. Hm, do I have to start worrying?  :wink:
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 08, 2016, 12:22:59 pm
Lol @ artifically enhanced. What is or isn't "artificial" is all arbitrary. At the end of the day it was still Jon Jones the human being whoopin everyone's ass. Nothing artificial about that. What he did to prepare himself to be such a ass whoopin human being is kind of irrelevant. Again, you are choosing to feel gutted based on some arbitrary and willfully blind construct you've built in your head. You don't have to feel that way. Supplements these days have all kinds of shit in them, and they're legal. Some fighters can't afford those supplements. Artificial??
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leshma on July 08, 2016, 06:37:40 pm
Yes, no, no, no, no, no, yes. Hm, do I have to start worrying?  :wink:

Didn't you buy your own apartment few years ago? Why worry about anything. Girls need security and considering where things are going, any male who owns his crib is basically jackpot.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 08, 2016, 09:45:57 pm
I love people with video editing skills LMFAO


Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Oberyn on July 09, 2016, 03:32:50 am
Unsurprised Leshma would enjoy the my old friendgiest sports possible and shit over MMA. Probably the excess of estrogen. Not surprised Falka picked a gif of women fighting, really gets the narrative across. "How barbaric! M'ladies sullying their hands with violence! Horrifying!" *tips fedora*. How does it feel to know either of those ladies could probably absolutely destroy you with nothing but their hands? Does that threaten you?

Lol at "gladiatorial". Until we start chucking convicts in pits to fight to the death for our amusement, it's just a retarded false equivalency. Those people work their asses off and compete with hundreds of others for the opportunity to fight. It's a sports career, not something forced on them.

Every intensive physical sport produces a massive strain on the body. MMA is still less destructive on a body than, say, boxing, and I doubt you wilting nancies ever said anything about that. This moral panic over MMA is led by the same moronic prudes who want to impose their "morality" over everyone else that show up anytime a new medium of any form emerges. Why don't you talk about how much more violent video games are these days compared to the past, and how this is clearly a signal of moral decay? Those awful fighting game tournaments, populated by "ghetto" people and scary violent young men, time to retreat to the feinting couch. You're just becoming old, Leshma, and you were already a pussy in the first place.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Oberyn on July 09, 2016, 03:39:18 am
I blame americunts for the rising popularity of this shit. Which only shows that we didn't move too far away from our ancestors who enjoyed gladiator fights.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


"Sport".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZh4XJ7UCGw

Sport.

Are you going to blame this on awful American moral decay infecting their culture? You clearly don't understand how popular martial arts are across the planet.
Incidentally that's probably the tamest possible gif you could've shown. A choke horrifies you this badly? Wow, how sheltered are you?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 09, 2016, 06:32:06 am

I wouldn't exactly call UFC a sport, but each to his own I guess.

I guess you wouldn't consider boxing, wrestling, judo, karate or jiu jitsu sports either then?

hurr durr reading comprehension is difficult

Is that why you are so fucked up?

I blame americunts for the rising popularity of this shit. Which only shows that we didn't move too far away from our ancestors who enjoyed gladiator fights.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


"Sport".

You do realize that the UFC was started by Brazilians?  There are dozens of competitors from many countries in the world including Korea, Russia, Croatia, Brazil, Canada, England, Holland, Mexico, and France among others.   Combat sports have been popular in many countries, K1 in Holland, Vale Tudo and Pride in Japan. 
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Macropus on July 09, 2016, 09:44:13 am
I blame americunts for the rising popularity of this shit. Which only shows that we didn't move too far away from our ancestors who enjoyed gladiator fights.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


"Sport".
That gif is ironically probably the worst example for showing how "cruel" this sport is. This woman obviously doesn't care about being choked, otherwise she would tap immediately. What she cared about is not losing, so she tried to escape as long as she was concious.
There's nothing dangerous in being choked out like that. And MMA isn't the only sport where that happens.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 09, 2016, 09:54:38 am
Is that why you are so fucked up?
Yes, that's why I appear fucked up to retards like you who are incapable of even first grade level reading comprehension.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Falka on July 09, 2016, 11:34:36 am
Every intensive physical sport produces a massive strain on the body. MMA is still less destructive on a body than, say, boxing, and I doubt you wilting nancies ever said anything about that.

And you're wrong. Amatuer/olympic boxing is fine, practiced it for a few months, it's pretty harmless. Hard to get hurt when you're wearing helmet. Professional boxing I consider almost equally retarded as mma.

You do realize that the UFC was started by Brazilians?

No, I don't and why would I? I know nothing about this so-called "sport". You, americunts - and Obercunt too, ofc - are so easily triggered by light hearted joke, almost like turks. And if I knew it's that important I wouldn't choose one of the very first picks from google when you search: brutal gif mma.

Lol at "gladiatorial". Until we start chucking convicts in pits to fight to the death for our amusement, it's just a retarded false equivalency.

But you know that gladiators didn't always fight to the death, right? Actually it was a rarity. And not every gladiator was forced to fight.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 09, 2016, 11:35:54 am

No, I don't and why would I? I know nothing about this so-called "sport". You, americunts - and Obercunt too, ofc - are so easily triggered by light hearted joke, almost like turks. And if I knew it's that important I wouldn't choose one of the very first picks from google when you search: brutal gif mma.
It's just him displaying his first grade level reading comprehension again. Who "started" it has no bearing on what you said, "rising popularity."

Not to mention the fact he's wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_Fighting_Championship#Early_competition_.E2.80.93_early_1990s
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Butan on July 09, 2016, 02:15:17 pm
Lol @ artifically enhanced. What is or isn't "artificial" is all arbitrary. At the end of the day it was still Jon Jones the human being whoopin everyone's ass. Nothing artificial about that. What he did to prepare himself to be such a ass whoopin human being is kind of irrelevant. Again, you are choosing to feel gutted based on some arbitrary and willfully blind construct you've built in your head. You don't have to feel that way. Supplements these days have all kinds of shit in them, and they're legal. Some fighters can't afford those supplements. Artificial??

Lots of MMA fighters clearly trained tough, had a very strict regimen, ate everything their body needed and rested tons. I think they are all artificially stronger than they should be if they didnt do all that and should be banned from all fighting sport organisation. Anyone doing more than pilate training and being skinny lean are roided out brutes that cheats people out of the fair wins they should have had!


This forum is big on stuff like: history (kinda obvious why), nationalism, gaming (duh), firearms (na is dead so thats fixed), violence (ufc among other stuff), bodybuilding, naked chicks. [...] It is time to at least consider growing up a bit.

Considering any of these things are not mature hobbies after a certain age makes me fear for your testosterone level. And no, not only men have testosterone, so your androgynous-self should be concerned.


And you're wrong. Amatuer/olympic boxing is fine, practiced it for a few months, it's pretty harmless. Hard to get hurt when you're wearing helmet. Professional boxing I consider almost equally retarded as mma.

MMA is as harmless as any other fighting sport, unless you train in a 100% hardcore pro fighters club? You can take a year long course of MMA in any normal club and they will not make you bleed, nor break your bones even once. What you see on TV are competitions, unless you want to prepare for a competition you dont train for a competition, so you dont face competition-like injuries (unless you just like hardcore sparring). The worst thing that your coach want is to injure you in training.



And on the gladiator topic, yes MMA has some similarities compared to our modern perspective: it can be entertaining to watch, yet is violent. The comparison stops here because there is no death included, and everyone is here on their free will  :P
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 09, 2016, 04:28:21 pm
Lots of MMA fighters clearly trained tough, had a very strict regimen, ate everything their body needed and rested tons. I think they are all artificially stronger than they should be if they didnt do all that and should be banned from all fighting sport organisation. Anyone doing more than pilate training and being skinny lean are roided out brutes that cheats people out of the fair wins they should have had!

That's the thing, they ALL take supplements, that's not natural, is it? It's unfair compared to someone who's not taking them!

Jon Jones' probably got banned because he took in a banned substance from one of his supplements, unknowingly. That should tell you everything you need to know. It's just semantics. The supplements that they all take are highly "unnatural" and it's just a game of "what gets banned when" and replacing it with something that's not banned yet. And sometimes they mess up, and there's a substance there that's on the banned list, because they're so similar.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Falka on July 09, 2016, 05:33:51 pm
MMA is as harmless as any other fighting sport, unless you train in a 100% hardcore pro fighters club?

:rolleyes: Now you're kidding me, right? RIGHT? Have you ever seen judo or karate? And obviously every training is supposed to be relatively harmless and risk free, even gladiators didn't kill each other during practice sessions. But why does it even matter, I referred to competitive mma.

No matter what, according to you, it says about my testosterone level, I claim that taking pleasure in watching like other people hurt each other is barbaric, no better than watching dog fights. But looks like not everyone can be as enlightened as me. Shame.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 09, 2016, 06:29:34 pm
Judo is harsher than MMA. I used to get headaches as a kid after every practice because of the intensity and the amount of repetitions. Your body takes a lot more, and a lot harder impacts than it does in MMA.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Falka on July 09, 2016, 07:08:08 pm
I clearly don't know what I'm talking about. Not surprising since I know nothing about martial arts. But it doesn't change that mma is barbaric. Same with watching it.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Butan on July 09, 2016, 07:10:21 pm
I referred to competitive mma.

Which refers to like 1% of the MMA pool. The other 99% just have fun.
I dont judge the sport violence by the most bloodiest matchs that happened between elite players, nor should you.

And I was poking Leshma about testosterone  :P
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 09, 2016, 07:17:04 pm
I clearly don't know what I'm talking about. Not surprising since I know nothing about martial arts. But it doesn't change that mma is barbaric. Same with watching it.
I don't see why it's barbaric when they do it voluntarily. Watching it without being a fighter yourself is weird though, you just want to see guys get beat up or something.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Macropus on July 09, 2016, 07:30:52 pm
I'm not a fighter, but I like MMA because it's interesting and competitive, not because I enjoy violence. People getting hurt in process is just something you can't avoid all the time with that kind if sport.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 09, 2016, 07:52:28 pm
"Cheating"

Yes, it's against some stupid UFC rules, so what. The better fighter will still win. "B-b-b-but he used steroids", so what, he still beat your ass, not an excuse.

Xant please enlighten me as to what I've failed to comprehend about your statement when I responded by saying that performance enhancing drugs (which include steroids) are banned in most if not all sports because they give unfair advantage over those not using them.  What you've said in so many words is that a boost in strength and speed of x % has no bearing at all on a physical contest.  Are you seriously disputing the fact that steroids give an advantage in a sporting event?

The excuse of Jones, that you so willingly believe, that he unknowingly took tainted supplements is as laughable as Overeem saying that his ballooning up to 265 lbs with mounds of muscles in such a short time was just due to genetics.

So by your logic a ped using Lance Armstrong was always the better bicyclist in comparison to a non doper.

As far as being a silly rule to prohibit peds, is it silly just when the UFC does it or is it still silly when the IOC does it also?

I clearly don't know what I'm talking about. Not surprising since I know nothing about martial arts. But it doesn't change that mma is barbaric. Same with watching it.
It's good that you're not forced to watch it or partake in it.  THAT would be truly barbaric.  A little barbarism is not all bad. 
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leshma on July 09, 2016, 07:57:16 pm
And I was poking Leshma about testosterone  :P

I'm balding. Any further questions, tough guy?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 09, 2016, 08:02:56 pm
I'm not a fighter, but I like MMA because it's interesting and competitive, not because I enjoy violence. People getting hurt in process is just something you can't avoid all the time with that kind if sport.

Real truth is u like MMA because the greatest MMA fighter of all time comes from Russia. XNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 09, 2016, 08:12:22 pm
Maybe, but he should retire again.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Macropus on July 09, 2016, 08:33:51 pm
Real truth is u like MMA because the greatest MMA fighter of all time comes from Russia. XNXNXNXNXNXNXNXNXN
Russia stronk! Suka
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Butan on July 09, 2016, 08:47:16 pm
I'm balding. Any further questions, tough guy?

None sir.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 09, 2016, 08:55:33 pm
The excuse of Jones, that you so willingly believe, that he unknowingly took tainted supplements is as laughable as Overeem saying that his ballooning up to 265 lbs with mounds of muscles in such a short time was just due to genetics.
Again you prove you know nothing. DW believes Jones took tainted supplements, and people have actually legitimately been suspended and then have their suspensions considerably shortened because of tainted supplements when they proved the supplements were tainted. Jones being a victim of the same is no stretch. Which you'd know if you weren't talking out of your ass.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 09, 2016, 09:08:32 pm
Again you prove you know nothing. DW believes Jones took tainted supplements, and people have actually legitimately been suspended and then have their suspensions considerably shortened because of tainted supplements when they proved the supplements were tainted. Jones being a victim of the same is no stretch. Which you'd know if you weren't talking out of your ass.

Sure it's possible, and many a proven doper has used that same excuse,  but in any particular case it's utter speculation on your part which indicates that your ass is much more productive than mine.

I also notice that you haven't addressed my lack of reading comprehension concerning your statement that steroids use shouldn't be a cause for concern because the if the winner used them he was the better fighter anyway.  I await enlightenment.  I hope you won't dodge it.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 09, 2016, 09:14:42 pm
Back to the main event and the subject of the thread.  I think Lesner will win the match.  I'm hoping that Mark Hunt will win because I like his attitude and personality and I think he is the underdog.  Hunt is not as athletic as Cain Velasquez and I'm not sure if he can take the same advantage as Cain did if Lesner flinches and covers up and retreats when he gets hit.  I just don't have much faith in Mark's ground game if Lesner takes him down and controls him.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Leesin on July 09, 2016, 09:48:37 pm
Hunt actually has a fairly good ground game, he has caught caught some proven ground guys in submissions and also escaped submissions from proven ground guys. It wouldn't surprise me if Hunt would be able to catch Cock Chestner in a submission on the ground if he shoots in and takes Hunt down in a panic. Lesnar is big, powerful and a great wrestler, but he loses all composure when he gets hit with a good shot. Hunt is very strong and durable and hits like a truck, I don't think Lesnar would be able to take him out quick enough so that Hunt doesn't have several attempts at landing big shots, if he lands one I think it will be game over for Broccoli Sesna, because if it doesn't KO him out right, he will start tap dancing all over the cage and get hit with more or make a desperate take down attempt which could lead him into a submission or more punishment.

Not saying Brock doesn't have a chance at winning, he does, because he is a fucking unit that can wrestle well and obviously hits fairly hard, I just think most of advantages go to Hunt and well, I like Hunt a lot more than that massive wanker that has a cock tattooed on his chest, so I hope he does win. Could be a possible win by Lesnar if he takes Hunt down then just holds him down for the "lay and pray" win, which we all know is fucking disappointing to watch.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 10, 2016, 01:29:32 am
As a big Mousasi fan was a bit scared for him but he pulled through. Happy. I hope he keeps this up and eventually gets a titleshot. Although I'd prefer him at LHW.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 10, 2016, 02:07:20 am
As a big Mousasi fan was a bit scared for him but he pulled through. Happy. I hope he keeps this up and eventually gets a titleshot. Although I'd prefer him at LHW.

Results already?  What time did they start the matches.  I like Mousasi  too.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Oberyn on July 10, 2016, 03:15:46 am
Results already?  What time did they start the matches.  I like Mousasi  too.

http://stationfy.com/watch/578186da42f5d65a531214b1
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 10, 2016, 04:05:28 am

I also notice that you haven't addressed my lack of reading comprehension concerning your statement that steroids use shouldn't be a cause for concern because the if the winner used them he was the better fighter anyway.  I await enlightenment.  I hope you won't dodge it.
What part about that don't you understand?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 10, 2016, 05:10:02 am
What part about that don't you understand?
I obviously understand it since I restated your position.  You are the one contending that I do not comprehend it.

Well if you agree that I have stated your position correctly then obviously I comprehended it correctly also.  That then brings us full circle to the ridiculousness of saying that having an advantage that has been judged to be unfair by an organization that a person belongs to should not be cause for complaint when it's use is uncovered.  You exceed that silliness with the ludicrous leap of logic that a fighter using such an unfair advantage to win would have won anyway because he was the better fighter so it doesn't matter if he cheated.   

I'm pretty sure I've comprehended your meaning accurately but I look forward to having you correct me if I have not.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 10, 2016, 05:27:53 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 10, 2016, 06:37:42 am
What a shit card. Looked good on paper, then Jones pulls out, and the fights we get are boring as fuck. Hunt throwing 1 strike in the entire fight and plodding forward slowly the rest of the time...
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 10, 2016, 06:51:31 am
Lesner wins by decision.  Looks like Cain Velasquez is back.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 10, 2016, 12:10:11 pm
What a shit card. Looked good on paper, then Jones pulls out, and the fights we get are boring as fuck. Hunt throwing 1 strike in the entire fight and plodding forward slowly the rest of the time...

True. Well the main card sucked IMO except for the Aldo/Edgar fight.

But the prelims were where the action was at. There were some good fights there.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Paul on July 10, 2016, 09:27:21 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


That tingly feeling when you haven't played touchbutt in the park for a whole day.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Macropus on July 11, 2016, 01:12:56 am
I think a lot of people changed their opinion about Northcutt after his fight. I certainly did.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Sir_Hans on July 11, 2016, 04:15:17 am
where is my russian link to the ufc 200 full fight???

I want to watch it :3
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 11, 2016, 10:28:25 am
where is my russian link to the ufc 200 full fight???

I want to watch it :3

Not Russian but it'll do XAXAXAXAXAXA ))))))

http://watchwrestlingup.info/watch-ufc-200-tate-vs-nunes-lesnar-vs-hunt-online-720p-hd-live/

I think a lot of people changed their opinion about Northcutt after his fight. I certainly did.

His creepy smile tho

Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 12, 2016, 06:30:07 am
Oh he's a God Squad member!

I thought Amanda Nunes was very impressive against Tate.  Or perhaps it was that Tate was not all that impressive.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 12, 2016, 07:34:53 am
Wow, Sage is super awkward. He looks like a jock, but the way he talks, the way he looks when he talks, his weird smiles, everything.. just very awkward.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Sir_Hans on July 12, 2016, 09:08:23 am
ty! ty! ty! <3  Lord Bergenger
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Bjord on July 12, 2016, 12:18:54 pm
Wow, Sage is super awkward. He looks like a jock, but the way he talks, the way he looks when he talks, his weird smiles, everything.. just very awkward.

This post says more about you than Northcutt.  :lol:

I can see how that Finnish cynicism gets tickled by his enthusiasm.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Xant on July 12, 2016, 12:23:20 pm
This post says more about you than Northcutt.  :lol:

I can see how that Finnish cynicism gets tickled by his enthusiasm.
Shouldn't you be posting about quitting and/or returning to cRPG?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Bjord on July 12, 2016, 03:34:28 pm
Shouldn't you be posting about quitting and/or returning to cRPG?

Why would I even bother.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Sir_Hans on July 14, 2016, 08:55:18 am

Maybe you can get high off of Jesus Christ?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 14, 2016, 08:27:39 pm
This post says more about you than Northcutt.  :lol:

I can see how that Finnish cynicism gets tickled by his enthusiasm.

Not really.  Northcutt is a bit off.


As an aficionado and student of jiu-jitsu I was very impressed with the way Anderson Silva was able to essentially neutralize DC's GNP game. 
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Paul on July 15, 2016, 09:25:23 am
It's the Brazilian streetlore of survival. Fight the physically superior assailant off on your back until your friend stabs him from behind.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 15, 2016, 07:56:36 pm
It's the Brazilian streetlore of survival. Fight the physically superior assailant off on your back until your friend stabs him from behind.

Are there so many Arabs in Brazil?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Oberyn on July 16, 2016, 12:09:07 am
There was a lot of arab christian migration to Brazil when they were still mostly ruled by the Ottoman Empire. Not a lot of arab muslims though, it's a hardcore christian country, more fanatic about it than the US by far. Christianity mixed with a lot of african animism elements.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: LordBerenger on July 16, 2016, 02:18:48 am
In other news. Seems like Lesnar has been notified by USADA (ones who drug test) of a potential violation a.ka he seems to have popped for something steroids or any other PED maybe
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 16, 2016, 04:30:44 am
In other news. Seems like Lesnar has been notified by USADA (ones who drug test) of a potential violation a.ka he seems to have popped for something steroids or any other PED maybe

Quite shocking.  I'm flabbergasted.  Hunt should get a NC and Lesner should pay back his winnings and be suspended for 2 years if the B sample also show PEDs.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 16, 2016, 04:42:25 am
There was a lot of arab christian migration to Brazil when they were still mostly ruled by the Ottoman Empire. Not a lot of arab muslims though, it's a hardcore christian country, more fanatic about it than the US by far. Christianity mixed with a lot of african animism elements.

I was searching for a reason for Paul's belief in Brazilian back stabbing tendencies.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Oberyn on July 16, 2016, 04:57:54 am
...oh

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Paul on July 16, 2016, 05:47:45 am
I'm sure it's because of the amount of proto-muslim genetics over there.

(click to show/hide)


In unrelated news, Bork being in his late thirties bigger than ever while relatively lean - who could have suspected anything?
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Turkhammer on July 16, 2016, 09:36:37 pm


In unrelated news, Bork being in his late thirties bigger than ever while relatively lean - who could have suspected anything?

Certainly not his fans.

I'm sure it's because of the amount of proto-muslim genetics over there.



That's perfectly logical.
Title: Re: UFC 200
Post by: Butan on July 17, 2016, 02:40:32 am
Ongoing discussion in the thread "UFC 200":

Ottoman Empire arabs backstabbing people in Brazil are muslim on roids.