cRPG
Off Topic => General Off Topic => Topic started by: NejStark on September 04, 2014, 02:20:47 am
-
I am a cav 4 lyf (unless I'm dehorsed, in which case fuck you) scrub, AMA.
-
What do you think about cavalry being useless in crpg?
-
Pikeman says [H]ello. (I miss my pocket pike)
-
What do you think about cavalry being useless in crpg?
Its not
-
If I want to play cav what horse should I buy? Should I even consider using a horse which is not +3 ?
-
I play a DonkeyArcher now and then - unloomed ofc - and even that puts me easily in the middle of the scoreboard.
So, when I manage decent rounds on a Donkey, unloomed horses are probably still okay.
-
I play a DonkeyArcher now and then - unloomed ofc - and even that puts me easily in the middle of the scoreboard.
So, when I manage decent rounds on a Donkey, unloomed horses are probably still okay.
When I say cav I mean melee cav. You don't really need a good horse if you play HA or HX.
-
Well, lemme put it this way then:
In my experience the Padded Warhorse for example tanks already quite a lot of hits when not loomed. Haven't really tried any other horse lately.
-
If I want to play cav what horse should I buy? Should I even consider using a horse which is not +3 ?
Take whichever one you like the look of.
-
Its not
You should have said yes and take all the glory everytime you kill someone with such a shitty class.
-
Would it be hypocrisy if someone would create a mod where one could play a horse crossbowman, but then ban everyone picking that choice?
-
No, absolutely not.
I can give you a full detailed list which people are playing HX... Just saying.
For looms
-
Would it be hypocrisy if someone would create a mod where one could play a horse crossbowman, but then ban everyone picking that choice?
I dont think thats hypocrisy. Hypocrisy would be if you banned them all but played the class yourself I think.
-
Not sure how garbage the archers are atm but with the recent nerfs to cavalry I'd say it put the class from crap to useless
-
Ama? Are you a traditional Japanese (and predominantly female) diver?
-
Would it be hypocrisy if someone would create a mod where one could play a horse crossbowman, but then ban everyone picking that choice?
Wouldn't you ban people who choose to ban themselves?
Ama? Are you a traditional Japanese (and predominantly female) diver?
Prpavi tell me, you don't know what Reddit is, am I right?
-
If you choose one door out of three to believe there is a prize behind it (only 1 door contains prize) and I open another door to show you there's no prize behind it, do you open the door you've initially chosen or do you open the other door?
-
If you choose one door out of three to believe there is a prize behind it (only 1 door contains prize) and I open another door to show you there's no prize behind it, do you open the door you've initially chosen or do you open the other door?
This again
-
Ama? Are you a traditional Japanese (and predominantly female) diver?
No
-
Not sure how garbage the archers are atm but with the recent nerfs to cavalry I'd say it put the class from crap to useless
Cav is still strong enough to be considered a lame class.
If you choose one door out of three to believe there is a prize behind it (only 1 door contains prize) and I open another door to show you there's no prize behind it, do you open the door you've initially chosen or do you open the other door?
I'd open the door I have initially chosed as the removal of the third one doesn't affect anything.
-
nah just because people lack awareness doesn't justify in a class being overpowered, cavalry are so predictable and so easy to kill that it's not even funny
-
Cav is still strong enough to be considered a lame class.I'd open the door I have initially chosed as the removal of the third one doesn't affect anything.
is this ur ama m80? also rong
-
nah just because people lack awareness doesn't justify in a class being overpowered, cavalry are so predictable and so easy to kill that it's not even funny
Well dont be predictable then. :P
Im not talking about backstabbing (although it is a great advantage). Last time i played lancer i could 1vs1 againsf inf pretty often, and im not great at playing cav.
-
Macropus is so wrong he's double wrong.
-
Macropus is so wrong he's double wrong.
Double wrong means right, right?
-
2010 cav? Or 2010 cav.
-
I'd open the door I have initially chosed as the removal of the third one doesn't affect anything.
Wrong
| door 1 (picked) | door 2 | door 3 | stay at door 1 | switch door |
| Win | Lose | Lose | Win | Lose |
| Lose | Win | Lose | Lose | Win |
| Lose | Lose | Win | Lose | Win |
The chance of the original door stays at 1/3rd, but the 2nd door has a chance of 2/3rds
-
chadz u so clever.
I would have stayed with the original door. My chances were 1/3. Now they've become 1/2. I already feel like a winner even if there's nothing behind my door.
Nessaj, I didnt play M&B in 2010, so 2014 cav imo. Roll with the blows (edit: and hold your head high).
-
Wrong
The chance of the original door stays at 1/3rd, but the 2nd door has a chance of 2/3rds
Are you serious? After the removal of the third door, the chance of original door becomes 1/2 as well as for other door.
The table should be more like:
| door 1 (picked) | door 2 | door 3 | stay at door 1 | switch door |
| Win | Lose | Lose | Win | Lose |
| Lose | Win | Lose | Lose | Win |
| Lose | Lose | Win |
-
Are you serious? After the removal of the third door, the chance of original door becomes 1/2 as well as for other door.
The table should be more like:
Monty Hall Problem - a famous brain teaser.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem)
Important are the assumptions about another door opened by the "host" with a "Lose" in it and those other ones or it might not work.
The probably most important thing to realize is that the probability of "Win" doesn't change for the door you've chosen when another one is opened. That means with a switch you end up with 2/3 probability.
-
You guys make me sad. What an unpleasant behaviour.
*accepts his stupidity and walks away to read the wikipedia article*
-
I cant believe that all this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem#Direct_calculation
...exists to solve such a seemingly simple thing
-
Prpavi tell me, you don't know what Reddit is, am I right?
I do not visit Reddit, 4chan etc...
No
Damn :?
-
I cant believe that all this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem#Direct_calculation
...exists to solve such a seemingly simple thing
there's calculations for much more ridiculous shit
-
Have you ever drunk baileys from a shoe?
-
Once when i young and dumb I took my shoes off in a kebab shop after a hard night out then my girlfriend at the time decided to sell them to the super drunk guy sat next to her who then proceeded to run off my with 200€ shoes (since this tragic and expensive event I have never owned a pair of shoes worth more than 80€). I had to walk home in my socks. I was not happy, also ive never drunk baileys from a shoe.
-
I cant believe that all this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem#Direct_calculation
...exists to solve such a seemingly simple thing
Just a few more...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stochastic_processes_topics (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_stochastic_processes_topics)
-
Have you ever drunk baileys from a shoe?
No. Would you recommend it? I drink it (if I must) from the glass like a civilised person, or the bottle like a musketeer.