IMO it would be a good idea, but, it would have to have some limitations such as no STF's and that you have to regularly play on an account in battle/siege/duel to use it and making a max number of possible chars.
Why do you think that you need to play the character regularly on battle/siege/duel servers?so people don't have chars that are strictly for strat. it would also raise the activity in battle/siege/duel
so people don't have chars that are strictly for strat. it would also raise the activity in battle/siege/duel
so people don't have chars that are strictly for strat. it would also raise the activity in battle/siege/duel
Pretty nice idea, but on the same side their still should be a Hero...
Maybe you could reduce the amount of viable players on only players which are not in your faction (that would give smaller factions a bonus aswell ;) )
The idea with the ticks for every char is useless i think...
Chris, I am not sure I get what you mean by this?
This is not a suggestion I have, this perhaps is already implemented in strat, Im not sure since I have only been playing one character - not sure
This would just make it easier for the older clans to roll newer clans, who haven't had the chance to build up a back log of alts for every situation.
Actually I take my responses back. It would turn the game into banging your head agenst a wall non stop.
For sieges everybody would be either high power draw archer, high accuracy crossbows or strength crutch ing maulers. In field battles or village attacks it would be all cav, agi polearms and agi shielders. When you have one char aloud at a time you get to pick one, the other, or the median that does decent at both.
Would you rather have a fun time at field battles and sieges or get agi pol armed/crushtheoughed non stop?
Not sure it would turn out that way, anything can still be countered I think and it makes things more interessting. But lets make a scenario - you have 50 slots and you are the defender of a castle. What would be your pick then in terms of arch, xbow and maulers?
Are you serious? Especially you EU players know that most Strat factions will do anything to win. Sometimes that includes sitting in your castles and not doing anything with 30000 troops.
make an hybrid and you can play whatever you want in strat battles
just choose melee or ranged
For sieges everybody would be either high power draw archer, high accuracy crossbows or strength crutch ing maulers. In field battles or village attacks it would be all cav, agi polearms and agi shielders.
Exactly my thought.Sorry Gandmom but I really don't think this is a good idea. I think the week change over between characters we got now is more than enough.
If anything like this was implemented I think it should be limited to 2 characters, 6 is too high.
EDIT - Make it two characters and I agree with your suggestion... More than two I think is too much.
Also - Make it so you can switch 1 character with an alt once every two weeks.
For the armies we made during strat 4 we had to go with certain numbers of gears in each vategory based on aproximately how many different classes that usually applies for battles - and not based on what or who we actually was going to attack with the army we were building.
All the major clans, as fas as I know, makes their armies more or less exactly the same - a grey army allways has the same amount of each weapon (give or take) for their open field battles. One battle is the same as the next one - you never get surprised by Hetman suddenly fielding an all cavalry army for instance, if he would see it strategically wise to do so in a certain situation - since he cant because of lacking cavalry applicants.