cRPG

cRPG => Beginner's Help and Guides => Topic started by: Screaming Idiot on December 03, 2013, 12:48:14 am

Title: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Screaming Idiot on December 03, 2013, 12:48:14 am
So I've been tinkering around with the Miaodao and I enjoy playing it a lot. Going for a 18/21 2hand build, possibly using a blunt weapon.

However, I've seen a lot of people using the morningstar with a shield. I'm interested in using it because of its can-opening pierce damage and bonus against shields.

How does it work with a shield in terms of speed/damage reduction? Is it worth using a shield with it? Should I invest in 1h skill if I want to use it?
Feel free to include other suggestions.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Jarold on December 03, 2013, 12:53:45 am
Isn't it like a 30% reduction on speed and damage when using 1h/2h weapons with a shield?
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on December 03, 2013, 12:58:07 am
In my experience, 2h weapons used in their 1h mode are very handicapped. I would recommend against it.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Clockworkkiller on December 03, 2013, 01:08:21 am
Stop asking questions and get back to drawing
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Screaming Idiot on December 03, 2013, 01:16:06 am
Stop asking questions and get back to drawing

no u with your digitally drawn naked dog women

its distracting

you ugly potato you


Seriously though, can someone post stats comparing 1h Morningstar VS 2h Morningstar?
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: oreshy on December 03, 2013, 06:18:27 am
..skip the fun it.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: njames89 on December 03, 2013, 06:48:49 am
Isn't it like a 30% reduction on speed and damage when using 1h/2h weapons with a shield?

I believe this is correct. There is a 30% speed and damage penalty. Makes it very hard to use.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Moncho on December 03, 2013, 09:01:19 am
I thought that the penalty was reduced some patches ago?
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Taser on December 03, 2013, 09:17:35 am
Its not too bad tbh but the last time I used a morningstar 1h was in a strat battle where I had to pick up weapons and I got caught unawares with a morningstar while I had my shield on. I killed the guy and a couple others though. Had fun with it but it was slower than I'd like.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Screaming Idiot on December 03, 2013, 01:19:12 pm
Roit then.

So morningstar is pretty shite with a shield.
How about 2h? and what about the Bar Mace/Studded Warclub? Are they any good?
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Joseph Porta on December 03, 2013, 02:01:29 pm
use it for epeen and epic looks

fuq da poliec
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Phew on December 03, 2013, 03:24:26 pm
Overall it's going to hit as hard as a Fighting Pick (i.e. not hard) while swinging slower than a Long Maul. A Fighting Axe (for instance) would be more effective in every situation.

But 1h morningstar looks cool, so do whatever is fun for you.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Butan on December 03, 2013, 03:31:09 pm
Morningstar with a shield is definitely a no-no if you aim for dueling capacity.

It must be the slowest weapon usable in 1H/shield mode. Experiment with different PS/WM/ATH builds and report back but I think its nice only if you are a anti-infantry cavalryman or a footman turtle teamplayer.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Casimir on December 03, 2013, 03:37:31 pm
So I've been tinkering around with the Miaodao and I enjoy playing it a lot. Going for a 18/21 2hand build, possibly using a blunt weapon.

However, I've seen a lot of people using the morningstar with a shield. I'm interested in using it because of its can-opening pierce damage and bonus against shields.

How does it work with a shield in terms of speed/damage reduction? Is it worth using a shield with it? Should I invest in 1h skill if I want to use it?
Feel free to include other suggestions.

Don't bother with the shield on foot unless your manual blocking skills are absolutely atrocious.   If you interested in going as cavalry it can be effective but it's not necessary.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on December 03, 2013, 04:55:53 pm
Don't use 2h weapons in 1h mode (with a shield).  They're shit and not worth it at all (too slow and not enough damage).  The Bar mace is a fun 2h weapon to use, and is very useful in group fighting (not so much in "duel" situations). 
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Nehvar on December 03, 2013, 06:23:14 pm
So I've been tinkering around with the Miaodao and I enjoy playing it a lot. Going for a 18/21 2hand build, possibly using a blunt weapon.

However, I've seen a lot of people using the morningstar with a shield. I'm interested in using it because of its can-opening pierce damage and bonus against shields.

How does it work with a shield in terms of speed/damage reduction? Is it worth using a shield with it? Should I invest in 1h skill if I want to use it?
Feel free to include other suggestions.

I've dicked around with 2h/1h weapons in 1h mode quite a bit since the respec patch.  Even with plenty of 1h WPF I can say that they are still very slow.  It's a neat concept but the execution is awful.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Screaming Idiot on December 03, 2013, 06:52:23 pm
Okay guys, I get the whole "Dont use 2h on 1h mode".

Now to the other issue:

Comparing the Morningstar to the Bar Mace, Long Iron Mace, Studded Warclub, Mallet, and Great Maul: Which is better?
Other weapon suggestions are appreciated.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Patoson on December 03, 2013, 07:26:54 pm
Morningstar has good damage and armor penetration and can be used on horseback, barmace is longer and can knock down, and great maul is the hardest 2h IMO but devastating if used properly - it can crush through blocks with overhead swing if you hold it a bit and have more STR than the opponent, and it also knocks down more often.

My favourite is the barmace.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on December 03, 2013, 07:58:25 pm
I'd suggest the bar mace for regular battle server.  Morningstar is very good in strategus because so many people are using very heavy armor.  Mallet is a fun weapon, and easier to use than the great maul, but won't crush though nearly as often.  Great maul is pretty hard to use IMO, at least until you get some experience with it.  Running around with one makes you an instant target for a lot of people.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 03, 2013, 09:39:06 pm
Screaming, I'm fairly sure the 30% damage penalty was removed, there is however still the 30% speed reduction, which makes the 1h morningstar extremely slow, it's a decentish weapon though once you're used to the slowness.
And to your comparison, bar mace or morningstar are probably the best of those weapons.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Dach on December 03, 2013, 10:56:53 pm
Also I need to add that the morningstar is one of the best shieldbreaker weapon in the game!

Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Screaming Idiot on December 03, 2013, 11:44:42 pm
Also I need to add that the morningstar is one of the best shieldbreaker weapon in the game!

It also has that sweet can opening 38 pierce.

I think I'll go for the Bar Mace. I have used it before, and quite frankly it is very fun to use. Balanced in range and speed, hard hitting and with some sweet knockdown. I like it.

Thanks for all the help!
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Jarold on December 04, 2013, 03:30:41 am
Also I need to add that the morningstar is one of the best shieldbreaker weapon in the game!

Persian War Axe, and Great Long Bardiche....or am I missing out on something.  :?


I like the Long Iron Mace it knocks down a lot and it has great damage and speed. I hated the thrust at first but now I love it! So much so I had to masterwork it!
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Dach on December 04, 2013, 05:24:38 am
Persian War Axe, and Great Long Bardiche....or am I missing out on something.  :?

"...one of the best..."

Don't know what you missed... :lol:
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Joseph Porta on December 05, 2013, 05:38:19 pm
Screaming, I'm fairly sure the 30% damage penalty was removed, there is however still the 30% speed reduction, which makes the 1h morningstar extremely slow, it's a decentish weapon though once you're used to the slowness.
And to your comparison, bar mace or morningstar are probably the best of those weapons.

is this confirmed?
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Phew on December 05, 2013, 06:02:29 pm
is this confirmed?

Xeen was screwing around with a +3 Morningstar in 1h mode the other day, and it was hitting me for like ~15 dmg (about what 1h swords hit me for). So there is definitely still a damage penalty.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Nightmare798 on December 05, 2013, 06:06:04 pm
Morning star in 1H is actually pretty good, because the ammount of time that it takes to swing it can throw some people off guard.


That said, if they will just go and spam you, you are dead meat.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Phew on December 05, 2013, 06:08:49 pm
Morning star in 1H is actually pretty good, because the ammount of time that it takes to swing it can throw some people off guard.

The same reason it's good on horseback. It just hangs out there for a long time, able to hit people.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Nightmare798 on December 05, 2013, 06:10:24 pm
The same reason it's good on horseback. It just hangs out there for a long time, able to hit people.


Never tried that, might be fun.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Ronin on December 08, 2013, 09:51:29 pm
Just know that damage types (c, b, p) has no effect on braeking shields. Whether it is 38 pierce or 38 cut, it will do the same damage to shields. This is however not that important because that, anything with "bonus vs. shields" are super effective to shields; you will not feel much of a difference if your aim is breaking people's shields. Morningstar is also very effective on horseback, never miss using it on strat battles especially. It is a very popular choice in "today's modern armies".

Bar mace? It's simply a beast. Just be wary that it has 4.5 weight, it slows you down more than swords and you will feel that difference in battle a bit and it doesn't have thrust attack. However, you will knock out everyone in your path like a pro.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Tomas_Miles_again on December 08, 2013, 09:59:07 pm
Zlisch rocks it one handed, much styl, so pierce, wow
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Teeth on December 08, 2013, 11:03:20 pm
Also I need to add that the morningstar is one of the best shieldbreaker weapon in the game!
Nope, it is one of the worst. Although 38p does a ridiculous amount of damage to players, shields don't give a crap about the high armour penetrating capabilities of pierce damage. Which makes the morningstar worse at shieldbreaking than a 754 gold two handed axe, or virtually any other 2h/polearm shieldbreaking weapon.

Bar Mace is the best choice for a general purpose tin can opener. For other weapon suggestions, you should check out both Bardiches, I personally like how they look and feel.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: BlackWhite on December 23, 2013, 09:03:50 am
Use a Morningstar.
Title: Re: Morningstar: Yay or Nay?
Post by: Tzar on December 26, 2013, 12:45:41 am
Morningstar with 1h and shield on horse back sure :!: its a beast, but anything else hell no...  :lol:

Only if u go 2h