Eight people signing up against you is not considered aggression? :rolleyes: I'll remember that for the future.
Eight people signing up against you is not considered aggression? :rolleyes: I'll remember that for the future.
wasn't the war between hospitaller and chaos started over the above reason at the end of strat 3?
Allah just gained himself a bunch of Virgins after that fight. Sucks I have to spectate it while working.
TheBattlePity Party of Curaw
So Muffy threw a party but didn't want to invite Kelly because Kelley was friends with Heather and no one fucking liked Heather. No one liked Heather because Heather's a little bitch that spreads rumors about everyone, you can't trust Heather. Problem was Muffy invited Kelley to the party before she knew she was friends with Heather and now it was too late to uninvite Kelley because the party was only a day away and that would be rude. Uninviting Kelley the day before the party is something Heather would do. So Muffy threw the party and Kelley showed up in her purple dress and we all tried to be so nice to her because this would probably be the last party she ever went to and tomorrow at lunch she'd have to sit with Heather because we wouldn't let her sit with us because fuck Heather.
Fuck Heather.
I was wondering when you would show up chap!
HG didn't sign up against KUTT. I don't see how TAMDA was violated.While i have to agree there, that the clan didn't show up so it is still confusing having a crpg clan signing a strategus treaty while in another strategus faction together with another crpg clan so to speak. So you could even argue that signing TAMDA by HG in the first place would be invalid as they couldn't/didn't speak for the complete Remnant faction.
Read the fine print Murdertron, it was confusing because HG signed as apart of Remnant, so we assumed Remnant was in it. But also Remnant had a NAP with us so apparently we didn't view the NAP and Merc Agreements as the same thing or somewhere the line was fuzzy.
IMO, a NAP means you don't send resources against the other parties of the NAP. It has nothing to do with signing up against them in battles.I think it is upto how detailed the NAP is defined by those factions included in the treaty, players/mercing can be seen as resources of man power.
Also, as Murder said, HG is in TAMDA, not REMNANT.
If KUTT was disbanded isnt your contract(s) null and void?
It clearly states 60 day NAP and that this will stay in place even with changes to the clan's name or structure or banner--so do not bother with the argument of "KUTT is no more."
Pretty much my intentions for writing this thread was to find out what the community thinks the general idea of a NAP entails. Had it been merc support for a random fight, sure, not a big deal, but it was the same village they just sold to us.
With that said, this has been resolved between our two parties and no harsh feelings are kept, but the question does remain, what is the general expectation of a NAP agreement and what are some base-line ideas to draw from that?
Pretty much my intentions for writing this thread was to find out what the community thinks the general idea of a NAP entails. Had it been merc support for a random fight, sure, not a big deal, but it was the same village they just sold to us.
...