cRPG
cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Topic started by: Boss_Awesome on September 25, 2012, 08:31:04 pm
-
Currently, when no one shows up to a battle on either side, the attacker wins. This should be changed so that the defender wins. The risk should always be with the attacker. Also, since the attacker can choose when, how, and how often to attack, they can abuse the system. An attacker can spam attack a powerful target until they get a time where no one will show up or the server bugs out and they defeat a much more powerful target through bug abuse. Fix please.
-
You sure about this?
Last time I checked it was the defenders who won when nobody showed up, not the attackers.
Can you give a link to the battle where the attacker won when nobody showed up?
-
Currently, when no one shows up to a battle on either side, the attacker wins. This should be changed so that the defender wins. The risk should always be with the attacker. Also, since the attacker can choose when, how, and how often to attack, they can abuse the system. An attacker can spam attack a powerful target until they get a time where no one will show up or the server bugs out and they defeat a much more powerful target through bug abuse. Fix please.
If neither of the sides has anyone show up they both deserve to lose. If no one shows up it should make a "all troops deserted and took all the loot they can carry with them (lets say all troops gone, XX% goods/items)
-
Can you give a link to the battle where the attacker won when nobody showed up?
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=233
Defenders showed up, attacker did not. Attacker won. (even though the defenders had 0 men, they still showed.)
-
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=233
Defenders showed up, attacker did not. Attacker won. (even though the defenders had 0 men, they still showed.)
That`s some weird example :lol:
-
Weird, but it demonstrates the problem, never the less.
-
Weird, but never the less.
Yeah, u owned Zapper quite hard :D
-
Weird, but it demonstrates the problem, never the less.
Doesnt demonstrate the situation :P The defenders lost because they had no army to fight, not because both sides didnt show up.
-
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=233
Defenders showed up, attacker did not. Attacker won. (even though the defenders had 0 men, they still showed.)
That's a raid on a fief with no troops. Hence, why no tickets for defenders.
The thing is. Defenders DO win when nobody show up. I've yet to see a battle where nobody shows up and attacker wins.
Yeah, u owned Zapper quite hard :D
Seems like you were the one getting owned. Stop being a complete fucktard and get your head out your ass. Next time, just assume I am correct and will come and enlighten you as to why stuff is like it is. Right now, you just proved how big an idiot you are.
Also: From now on, you must call me "Great Master Jarlek" whenever you address me.
-
Yeah, u owned Zapper quite hard :D
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Pls keep on topic now.
-
That's a raid on a fief with no troops. Hence, why no tickets for defenders.
Even with no tickets, the attackers still didn't show up. How can you win without showing up?
-
Even with no tickets, the attackers still didn't show up. How can you win without showing up?
Good call, didn't notice that. Might be special rules for raids? Anyone know anything about that?