cRPG
cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Topic started by: KillerofFlowers on July 28, 2012, 11:17:54 pm
-
Subject says it, when the attackers use catapults and take down most of the walls they should definitely have to pay to fix it. If they don't fix it then the castle stays damaged for the next battle it has.
On top of this request all castles should have working gates so it adds a different approach to the castle instead of putting a hole in the wall
-
Good idea. Whoever holds a castle and has the troops and equip, should also be able to have the money and money income to repair the castle for a serious amount of gold.
-
Should also take a few days to fix the damages.
That way armies can try and attack again before the damages are fixed.
-
the only problem i see with this is if ppl start doing a quick siege of 200 men with catapults so that the castle then repairs itself before the main wave so it has less money for gear
-
Sample from KUTT battle but the one from the grey order battle today had a lot of dmg to it
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
Fuck working gates...makes sabotage too easy.
The castle repair suggestion however is totally reasonable and realistic.
-
well if the gates were being opened to let in the enemy then that will issue a ban, but instead then defenders can use it to either sally out in force or send out cav
-
I would like to see working gates.
That being said allow the commander of the team select other commanders who can also open the gate. Anyone can close a gate.
That was you can only be betrayed, not sabotaged.
-
well what about ai castles?
-
bump
-
the reason this is a great idea, is because defenders have to weigh whether or not they will sally out to attack catapults. So instead of just entire armies of STR gorilla juice heads in PLATE, there would be a purpose for cav & light agility skirmishers in these large sieges
-
the only problem i see with this is if ppl start doing a quick siege of 200 men with catapults so that the castle then repairs itself before the main wave so it has less money for gear
Would be a waste of money. Defenders would demolish such a puny army with a sally, or even a field interception right outside.
-
the only problem i see with this is if ppl start doing a quick siege of 200 men with catapults so that the castle then repairs itself before the main wave so it has less money for gear
That seems like it could be tactically very smart, and should be do-able. To prevent this, the attackers would have to sally out.
I think overall this is a great idea.
-
Would be a waste of money. Defenders would demolish such a puny army with a sally, or even a field interception right outside.
They could only sally out if all gates were to become workable. Otherwise they are jumping off the walls and are wasting ticks
-
the only problem i see with this is if ppl start doing a quick siege of 200 men with catapults so that the castle then repairs itself before the main wave so it has less money for gear
Don't you still need a certain number of people in order to attack, or was this changed recently?
-
Would be a waste of money. Defenders would demolish such a puny army with a sally, or even a field interception right outside.
They could just send a full army, bring construction stuff and minimal gear ie:1.5-2 waves worth of armor and weapons to give the illusion of a full battle, blast the shit out of the castle then retreat and not lose that many tickets/gear.
-
Don't you still need a certain number of people in order to attack, or was this changed recently?
Only against hero armies(player armies), not against fief's, doesnt matter ai or player own.
-
Only against hero armies(player armies), not against fief's, doesnt matter ai or player own.
U sure? because i tried to attack a ai fief with 500 troops for the hell of it and it had around4-5k but it wouldn't let me attack. Unless it was just changed.
-
Sample from KUTT battle but the one from the grey order battle today had a lot of dmg to it
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
I see you used a screen shot of some of my fine work. I can only approve.
They could just send a full army, bring construction stuff and minimal gear ie:1.5-2 waves worth of armor and weapons to give the illusion of a full battle, blast the shit out of the castle then retreat and not lose that many tickets/gear.
Yeah! ME WANTY!
I'll just roam around with 500 men and 30 csites with 600 con mats and blast the shit out of everything :twisted:
-
I see you used a screen shot of some of my fine work. I can only approve.
Yeah! ME WANTY!
I'll just roam around with 500 men and 30 csites with 600 con mats and blast the shit out of everything :twisted:
would be fun to watch happen lol
-
bump
-
bump
-
I completely forgot about this thread but I still think it would be a great thing to do for strat
So what I have to say is bump
-
This should really be implemented.
If you go and tear down half the walls of a castle in your conquest of the castle, you shouldn't get a brand new shiny castle when you win the siege...it should still be fucked up. You should have to pay to repair it, or else leave it in shambles.
-
In going to add a poll and I'm hoping this will be added in
-
bump
-
They could just send a full army, bring construction stuff and minimal gear ie:1.5-2 waves worth of armor and weapons to give the illusion of a full battle, blast the shit out of the castle then retreat and not lose that many tickets/gear.
well first of all that is totally not unrealistic, you are just making the enemy weaker by destroying their castles.
and second, if this happens, what would you do? just sit in your castle and let them shoot the fuck out of your castle? no, or you open the gates and let your knights kill them all or you wait untill the end of the battle and than just attack the army outside your gates and crush them in a battle.
-
Im going to keep saying this, but this should be added. It makes no sense that a castle gets repaired instantly at no cost.