Level:29
Experience:4,112,300
Level up in:308,278
Next level:4,420,578
Kills/Deaths:206/459, 1:2.2
Im a bad archer.
Also, fear the Namodachi. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2RjAy2CkkM)
Do you know what build Robert Namo was using in his vid? The MW NoDachi hurts a lot and so I was wondering how much PS he needs to pull those 1 to 2 hit kilsl off :). CheersThat build my friend was a 24/18 build because during that video shoot I was lvl 33. My Namodachi hurts in general but the slowness of it counters the amount of damage I can do in a short burst.
Level:29
Experience:4,112,300
Level up in:308,278
Next level:4,420,578
Kills/Deaths:206/459, 1:2.2
Im a bad archer.
Also, fear the Namodachi. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2RjAy2CkkM)
You were almoust always faster then your opponent with that nodachi,but what is realy interesting is one hit kills with that sword. What was ur build? I had 27 str 9ps and loomed greatsword and i couldn't one hit anything. Even archers were surviving. :rolleyes:
That build my friend was a 24/18 build because during that video shoot I was lvl 33. My Namodachi hurts in general but the slowness of it counters the amount of damage I can do in a short burst.
That build my friend was a 24/18 build because during that video shoot I was lvl 33. My Namodachi hurts in general but the slowness of it counters the amount of damage I can do in a short burst.
Everyone brag about your mad skillz and high kill/death ratios.
I wanna see intense frag videos with dubstep and pictures of insanely high 15:1 ratios.
Show off your broken killing-machine builds and inflate your e-peen.(click to show/hide)
Judging by these KDs it would seem me and San are best players in CRPG
Judging by these KDs it would seem me and San are best players in CRPG
Judging by these KDs it would seem me and San are best players in CRPG
Once I'm lvl 30 again I'll be back to the Old Ways.
Russian guy, DimaUrban had 16:1 or something like that.
1795/637, 2.8:1and loose fucking weeks of playing, change it devs please. Let me pay 50k gold for a respec with 10% xp loss or something.
And now it's time to respec into a thrower :D
Oh and didn't you know that you need to subtract 2 of a horseman's K/D to properly compare to infantry?
My cav alt has a kdr of -.9:1, it seems.Mine has one of -.7:1, I didn't make the rules, thats just how it works.
Good enough.
Mine has one of -.7:1, I didn't make the rules, thats just how it works.
I'm -1.4:1 also (only level 26, but again, I didn't make the rules)
Russian guy, DimaUrban had 16:1 or something like that.
Not even a third of that.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Mine
Role:Main
Generation:2
Type:Regular
Level:25
Experience:1,852,164
Level up in:76,994
Next level:1,929,158
Kills/Deaths: 324/99, 3.273
Leed used to have 6 or 7 k/d, I'm pretty sure of that. I thought every good cav in this game had better k/d than 4.
I get 40-50 percent of my kills on foot.
My horse rarely lasts the entire round.
I honestly thought that most cav have super high k/d because before speed nerf they've used to score 50-1 and higher. I was trying to reach 3.0 k/d on my main but then I started fooling around, playing in rags, using low grade weapons etc.
People who play in top gear most of the time and don't fool around shouldn't have problems to get 3.5-4 k/d.
Yes, but you're a fucking terrible cav, you whine about cav backstabbing and picking their engagements, then play a light armored build that does exactly that. I don't think I've ever seen anyone run and hide as much as you, and I've specced Sir_Agor.
edit: To Leshma btw, not Huey. Huey is ma bro, and a good cav.
If an EU cav was going 50-1 EU players must be awful. And Roh is by far the best lancer cav in CRPG. I remember back several months ago when he played it he would get into cav fights with heuy and easily kill him, which says alot considering heuy was part of the team that dominated the EU cav players on EU ping in the tourney. Roh makes heuy look bad, and heuy makes your best cav players look bad, so just imagine how good Roh is. And given your 16:1 exxageration, ur guy who u said was 7:1 is probabbly more like 3:1.
And ya to what heuy said, problem with cav opness is in part being able to be very effective on foot. You lose 5-7 points from riding, but other than that you can have a perfectly useable melle build. There has been times were ive gotten alot of my kills on the ground.
If an EU cav was going 50-1 EU players must be awful. And Roh is by far the best lancer cav in CRPG. I remember back several months ago when he played it he would get into cav fights with heuy and easily kill him, which says alot considering heuy was part of the team that dominated the EU cav players on EU ping in the tourney. Roh makes heuy look bad, and heuy makes your best cav players look bad, so just imagine how good Roh is. And given your 16:1 exxageration, ur guy who u said was 7:1 is probabbly more like 3:1.
U are fucking retarded. Freaking na fanboy, jezz christ. He is maybe best in na, but maybe not in eu ?. But apparently u know every eu player, and apparently every eu cav player was in that cav tournament.Lemmy is a waste of time and forumspace. I advice not to pay any attention to him.
Retarded. Playing a 3 vs 3 tournament in a little circular box with teams based more on friendships/clan associations than skill, and where killing an enemy horse got you automatically eliminated from that round isn't exactly a proper representation. None of the EU teams was entirely composed of "good" cav. I guess the ridiculous Smoothrich propaganda has become a matter of faith for NA. Not surprising, anything that even suggests NA>everyone else is desperately latched on and milked for all it's worth. Just like RL really.
Although given his K/D as lancer and xbow Rohypnol is probably one of the best cav player in cRPG, no way of really knowing until chadz builds his mid atlantic ocean lair. And seems more like a Chase type guy who is good at any class. Is Rohypnol any good at melee?
EU players are always saying EU is so much better than NA and that claim is completely unjustified. In regards to cav players, the only comparison has been that torunment, which NA won despite there being like 7 EU teams and 1 NA team. Therefore that being the only thing to go on, if you had to say, NA has better cav. And the NA team that won was also comprised of friends not the best cav players on NA, Roh was not on the team. And from what i see when im on EU occasionally, whenever Byz is on they roll the server unlike any clan ive seen.
On NA no clan is that dominate, and it can always atleast be a winnable fight for either side. Byzantine had a team, which i would have to assume given their dominacnee was comprised of some of the best if not the beset cav on EU, and that would be true given Byz beat the other EU teams and got to the finals, but they lost to the USA team, for the second time in the tourney as they lost in the first or second round to them i think. So your best players from your best clan losing twice to team USA, sounds convincing to me.
And i dont see how the setup was stupid, if you get dehorsed, and then manage to dehorse and kill your opponent on foot, how does that make you the better cav player?
No, you see, I sometimes go on NA and rape the shit out of it, I've seen Byzantium do it as well, if I was a moronic cunt I would suggest that this obviously proves EU is superior to NA in every way. And the only EU players saying stupid shit like that are your retarded counterparts who think that being born or from a particular geographical location makes you better at hand-eye coordination in a video game. It's ok, it's not your fault if you don't understand how genetics and culture works. You wouldn't want to overload your meager intellectual capabilities with actual thought.
Im basing my assertions on actual evidence, the tourney, not genetics. And unless you have you rolling NA on film like we have the tourney on film, i cant count it as evidence of EU superiority.
And GTX EU players constnatly claim EU is much better than NA on forums, not many NA go around making that claim. Im only saying cav players are better, and again i have actual evidence to support my claim.
EU is mad.
And GTX EU players constnatly claim EU is much better than NA on forums (heck Leshma was basically doing it in this thread)
your retarded counterparts
Will u shut up alrdy ? thats hardly evidence. And the only one saying NA is better right now is u.... i dont see any EU players.
PLZ shut up and let us continue with what the thread was actually made for?
EU players are always saying EU is so much better than NAopen the spoiler and see awesomeness of herkderp
open the spoiler and see awesomeness of herkderp
just saying(click to show/hide)
Oh that's your new forum account Herkku? Didn't you get banned on purpose to stay away from the forums?No i am his Swedish brother
No i am his Swedish borther
How did this turn into ANOTHER NA vs EU thread.
How did this turn into ANOTHER NA vs EU thread.
me > 19172/7040, 2.7:1I got 3.4, my Polish friend.
elmer > 10092/5377, 1.9:1
kerrigan > around 2.9 if i remember correctly
masasa > around 3.0
I got 3.4, my Polish friend.
heuy
heuy
heuy
heuy
Are you dyslectic?Seriously, Bjord. You must love to nitpick through posts on this forum and to affirm your misplaced sense of superiority by whining about their tiny spelling errors, are you that much of a shut-in?
Either way, I feel bad for you. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer, so to speak.
Seriously, Bjord. You must love to nitpick through posts on this forum and to affirm your misplaced sense of superiority by whining about their tiny spelling errors, are you that much of a shut-in?
On alt: 775/744
Touché, I see you still have a lingering pain in your rear end from that post.Yes, but only because of its blatant hypocrisy.
Owned nooblord BlackMilk :lol:? :D
Got no proof but back in the days when Courser and Arabian both were crazy fast and Arabian had silly high maneuver I've seen Kerrigan with 70 something versus 0 or 1.
Chase being infantry often had such high scores, Phase too. My highest is 32-0 I think.
Got no proof but back in the days when Courser and Arabian both were crazy fast and Arabian had silly high maneuver I've seen Kerrigan with 70 something versus 0 or 1.
But Leed probably had some really crazy high scores and he had around 100 ping most of the time. I'm talking about post upkeep time, before upkeep Lerva had more than 100 kills on one map I think.
Chase being infantry often had such high scores, Phase too. My highest is 32-0 I think.
(click to show/hide)
1million gold to any1 who beats this (with proof)
yeah thought not scrubs.
I've put up some stones for 1 million gold, just look for Templar_TomMyyY.
(click to show/hide)
1million gold to any1 who beats this (with proof)
yeah thought not scrubs.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Kills/Deaths:9525/5455, 1.7:1
but yeah, i'm just a pooly armored archer :P people tend to wanna chase me down... :(
that and the fact i sometimes spawn with a pike instead and die like a failure. :P
Lastly, concerning Badplayer's ping, there is no evidence that his ping remained that high for the entire duration of the battle. It is quite possible tha