cRPG

cRPG => Game Admin Feedback => Topic started by: epoch on November 19, 2011, 10:03:10 am

Title: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: epoch on November 19, 2011, 10:03:10 am
Basically he's a sperg... u make a ban request about his friends with more than 9 pics of the team killing in 1 round he locks them repeatedly.... this guy is total bad, get rid of him


Example 1

(he precedes to tell me to get more solid proof ... since my 9 ss of poop tking and griefing and leaching isnt enough)
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,20864.0.html

Example 2
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,20858.0.html
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Tydeus on November 19, 2011, 11:00:47 am
You have screenshots of a person being a bad player, not intentionally teamkilling. You show Rohy using the same language that the rest of this community uses. Then you have three inconclusive pictures of namo(Two of which are exactly the same picture by the way). Consistently posting bullshit that you call "evidence" for players is harassment. Poophammer and Namo, aren't friends.

I consulted other admins and I waited several hours on your first thread to see if any admin actually saw something deserving a ban.

Not to mention there's a rule that specifically states that if your request is denied, do not make another thread about the same thing. You you didn't just do this once, you made three threads.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Meow on November 19, 2011, 11:14:55 am
Abooze!
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Tydeus on November 19, 2011, 11:26:02 am
Oh look, he's even muted now.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Earthdforce on November 19, 2011, 11:42:07 am
So yea, at least you have a thread now Tydeus.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Ganner on November 19, 2011, 12:34:28 pm
Just an FYI, screenshots of the death message do not constitute "Evidence" of anything.

The namo punch death is a little suspicious, but that's the only one even worth considering.

Epoc please continue to falsely  believe we admins are out to get you.  But also remember that trolling people to illicit a response and get them banned will be dealt with much more severely than normal.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: ManOfWar on November 23, 2011, 05:27:34 pm
Hes the reason why we had to password our damn channel! Annoying bugger!
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Canary on November 24, 2011, 07:36:59 am
Hes the reason why we had to password our damn channel! Annoying bugger!

For the record, he means epoch, not Tydeus. I wish Tydeus would come into our channel.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Earthdforce on November 24, 2011, 07:47:10 am
Yall could have just banned epoch..
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Gomer on December 09, 2011, 05:55:55 am
Tydeus is a troll..... He called me a troll In IRC (not that I'm not) but still....

[20:56] <Tydeus> what's a... a Clan?

Now that Im going through my post haf of em don't make sense....

Gomer's Random Post of the Day!
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Gomer on December 12, 2011, 08:14:28 am
Oh look, he's even muted now.

ABDOMEN ABOOZE!
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: ManOfWar on December 12, 2011, 08:26:46 am
For the record, he means epoch, not Tydeus. I wish Tydeus would come into our channel.

Oops forgot to clarify, my bad :(
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 19, 2012, 04:30:33 pm
admin chat abuser
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: beniliusbob on April 26, 2012, 08:18:00 pm
The other night Tydeus gave some douchebag delayer a 20 minute ban to go read the rules. It was awesome. Maybe I'm not exposed to enough effective adminship, but... thank you, Pro-admin Tydeus.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Draulius on April 30, 2012, 06:55:32 pm
Wish I could vote bad multiple times.  :lol:
Title: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Arthenon on June 24, 2012, 07:37:04 pm
i was on NA_CRPG-3 dueling and no one was complaining that i threw lances in the fight since throwers are slow in close combat, but i managed well. I dueled Farfel and he starts whining that i shouldn't use lances unless agreed upon so I'm like wtf? I'm a thrower and he's a 2h. It's more than fair for me to be able to throw. Next duel with him he kicks me. i come back and poll a kick for him due to admin abuse and he bans me not even letting the chance for my comrades to have their opinion on this. I declare admin abuse and that he be scowled at due to this recklessness. The classes are balanced so it's supposed to be used to it's utmost advantage. Do you guys agree with me or what?

Regards,

                Arthenon
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: RandomDude on June 24, 2012, 08:54:06 pm
i was on NA_CRPG-3 dueling and no one was complaining that i threw lances in the fight since throwers are slow in close combat, but i managed well. I dueled Farfel and he starts whining that i shouldn't use lances unless agreed upon so I'm like wtf? I'm a thrower and he's a 2h. It's more than fair for me to be able to throw. Next duel with him he kicks me. i come back and poll a kick for him due to admin abuse and he bans me not even letting the chance for my comrades to have their opinion on this. I declare admin abuse and that he be scowled at due to this recklessness. The classes are balanced so it's supposed to be used to it's utmost advantage. Do you guys agree with me or what?

Regards,

                Arthenon

I agree and I heartily scowl at this badmin. *scowl*
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Smoothrich on June 24, 2012, 09:29:27 pm
Just want to post the server rules here.

Quote from: cmp
Duel mode specific rules
All types of duels are allowed (ranged, mounted, shield, heavy armor...) if both duelists agree
No following or face-hugging the other duelist before the duel countdown has ran out - either hold your starting position or back-pedal if you want some distance between you and your opponent
No running away or going into unreachable places

So, I imagine you started with a melee weapon or in melee mode or at least that's what this admin thought, then once the duel started which he presumed would be melee, you started throwing shit at him.  He was probably having a bad day or something, raged at being owned by throwing in duel, and felt like you were griefing him and purposely tricking people into melee duels so you could throw stuff.  This could be interpreted as breaking the rules.

He kicked you for it, which was probably a bit rash, but within the rules of the duel server.  You came back and did a kick poll, which no one likes to see on low population servers like duel or DTV, because its usually rage polls that easily get passed.  He saw this as "poll abuse" which is frequently banned for.  Your ban was only for 1 hour if I recall, so you can go back to playing whenever.

Anyways, after speaking to the admin who did this, he felt like was just enforcing the rules, but realized he was too harsh with you and I think was probably just in a bad mood, which throwers certainly do not help fix haha.

A lot of players don't mind this, personally I enjoy juking the projectiles as I close the distance, but you should make it clear you are a thrower in advance if it isn't obvious so people know what they are agreeing to. 
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: HardRice on June 25, 2012, 09:59:21 pm
This guy, this guy... Every time I go onto duel he pulls that shit with someone. Starts in melee mode upblocks then as soon as duel starts throws shit at you. Very frustrating.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: oprah_winfrey on June 25, 2012, 10:08:17 pm
Generally, if you want to use throwing weapons, or even equip 2 weapons and are thinking about switching weapons mid duel (ie. start as 2h then switch to sword and board when blackbarred), it is best to cycle through your weapons when you initiate the duel. Kicking someone for not is a little harsh though.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Dexxtaa on June 26, 2012, 06:16:03 pm
I dunno. I was playing with him today, and he seems to be pretty uptight.

In the battle server, he ended up going so far as to shoot me (TK) after I admittedly bumped him by mistake while trying to defend him from incoming range (with my horse even). And this is after a string of events where he shoots arrows into my back (friendly fire).

He said it was a mistake, and he thought that I was the other rider (that was trying to kill him), but besides the same horse, we looked nothing alike.

I'm dubious as to how he gained his power as an admin, and I'm not going to the dev decision to make him an NA admin, but the fact I'm bringing this up should speak against this player as an admin.

I do not believe that revenge TK is justified under any circumstances (especially if it's in the next round after the fact), and it's shameful to have an administrator blatantly use his power to prevent others from kicking him.

Smooth, your points are valid, but they do not exemplify what an admin should be: tolerant, well mannered, and mature. This recount of kicking someone from duels just because he didn't like the way they carried out a duel does not - in any way - warrant a kick, or any use of admin power.

I don't care if you have a shitty day, you don't take it out on the people you serve. Administration is a service to the community, not a baton to play with and swing when you're pissed. If you're having a shitty day, don't fucking play video games. Go to the gym or something productive.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Miley on June 27, 2012, 10:20:44 pm
I dunno. I was playing with him today, and he seems to be pretty uptight.

In the battle server, he ended up going so far as to shoot me (TK) after I admittedly bumped him by mistake while trying to defend him from incoming range (with my horse even). And this is after a string of events where he shoots arrows into my back (friendly fire).

He said it was a mistake, and he thought that I was the other rider (that was trying to kill him), but besides the same horse, we looked nothing alike.

I'm dubious as to how he gained his power as an admin, and I'm not going to the dev decision to make him an NA admin, but the fact I'm bringing this up should speak against this player as an admin.

I do not believe that revenge TK is justified under any circumstances (especially if it's in the next round after the fact), and it's shameful to have an administrator blatantly use his power to prevent others from kicking him.

Smooth, your points are valid, but they do not exemplify what an admin should be: tolerant, well mannered, and mature. This recount of kicking someone from duels just because he didn't like the way they carried out a duel does not - in any way - warrant a kick, or any use of admin power.

I don't care if you have a shitty day, you don't take it out on the people you serve. Administration is a service to the community, not a baton to play with and swing when you're pissed. If you're having a shitty day, don't fucking play video games. Go to the gym or something productive.

+1 Dexterz0rz

I think it's very stupid to kick for that reason. If he has a problem with it, then don't duel again...? Anyways, Smoothrich quotes rules, so it apparently is against the rules. He had the right to kick you, but I think it was a madmin decision.

His name is also Mr_Snuffles or something like that, so if you know who that is, you know who Farfel is.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: oprah_winfrey on June 27, 2012, 10:24:33 pm
His name is also Mr_Snuffles or something like that, so if you know who that is, you know who Farfel is.

Wasn't that Dex's name when he got kicked out of chaos? 

Did I ruin the suprise?
Farfel sounds familiar but I cant think of it is
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Miley on June 27, 2012, 11:36:27 pm
Why would Dexxtaa be Farfel though? He just said Farfel tried teamkilling/teamwounded him.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Kreczor on June 28, 2012, 12:09:24 am
Wasn't that Dex's name when he got kicked out of chaos? 

Did I ruin the suprise?
Farfel sounds familiar but I cant think of it is

I think it may be tydeus.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: Dexxtaa on June 28, 2012, 03:01:03 am
Don't think Snuffles is Farfel.
Title: Re: Farfel - Admin abuse
Post by: oprah_winfrey on June 28, 2012, 04:51:42 am
I think it may be tydeus.

Yeah, now that you mention it, that may be it.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: JasonPastman on July 13, 2012, 05:35:18 pm
I don't even think this admin has read the rules.  He banned me on NA today for some made up version of leeching.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,35866.0.html

Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: JasonPastman on July 13, 2012, 05:52:38 pm
Bump, because Smoothrich is a good admin and aderyn delays all day. He even twed me when i let him use my sword the other day and then blamed me for it (not that I really cared BUT COME ON MAN!).

More importantly Tydeus needs to be removed as an admin NOW.  This guy dose not even know the rules he is tasked to enforce.

Furthermore, this guy still wears the PRO tag a clan that does not even exist anymore, what more evidence do you need that this guy has no clue?
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: JasonPastman on July 13, 2012, 06:13:41 pm
figured I would copy and paste the rules for Tydeus to read while I'm waiting for this issue to be settled...

Here is the link to Tyd  http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,2606.0.html

Official Server Rules
« on: February 28, 2011, 22:53:00 »
+16 Vote Down Vote Up Show voters
These rules apply to official servers:
- EU_cRPG_x (1,2,3,4,5,6,8)
- NA_cRPG_x (1,2,3,6)

Quote

    "first rule of em all: common sense"
        ~ chadz


If your common sense is not working, here are some more specific guidelines. This is not an explicit list, common sense always overrides disputes. Do not come crying "it's not prohibited in the rules" if you invent a new creative way to be an idiot and get punished.

Behavior rules

    No offensive behavior anywhere
        Remember that this is the internet. Don't be insulted if someone calls you an idiot.
    No offensive character names. If in doubt about a name, pick another one.


General rules

    No exploiting of any kind
        NOT OK: Bypassing the autobalance
        NOT OK: Using a bug to gain undeserved benefits
        NOT OK: Leaving and rejoining to server to spawn more than once in a round
    No intentional teamwounding/teamkilling during a round
    No malicious griefing of teammates (kickspamming, blocking, etc.)
    No drawing/delaying the round on purpose (i.e. running away or camping unreachable places when you're one of the last people alive)
        OK: running away and shooting enemies that are reachable by projectiles
        NOT OK: running away or avoiding confrontation when there is nobody to shoot in range or everyone is behind cover.
        NOT OK: running away or avoiding confrontation to search for ammo
    No abuse of in-game chat (racism, insulting, griefing...)
    No random kick/ban polls. Always specify reason before starting a poll
        OK: poll-kicking a leecher
        OK: poll-kicking an intentional teamkiller
        NOT OK: poll-kicking someone who involuntarily hurt you
        NOT OK: poll-kicking someone because you don't like his playstyle
    No leeching
        OK: Being a bad player and getting no kills
        NOT OK: Standing around away from keyboard. If you're away, switch to spectator mode
        NOT OK: Running around without no weapon. Not contributing is leeching, naked runners don't contribute. This point does not apply to Rageball, as long as you are actually playing the game.
        NOT OK: Autorunning your char to enemy to die
    Glitching is allowed, being an asshat isn't
        OK: hiding (e.g. in the hay)
        NOT OK: hiding when last man standing (i.e. delaying)
        OK: using a ladder to reach a roof that can't be reached normally
        OK: camping unreachable places in the middle of the round
        NOT OK: camping unreachable places when last group of men standing (i.e. delaying)
        NOT OK: exploiting invisible barriers
        NOT OK: going out of map bounds (if you can see unfinished parts of the map, then you should not be there)
        NOT OK: ladderpulting
    No siege equipment spam
        OK: Planting ladders to get to roofs or walls
        OK: Blocking a door with a construction site
        OK: Planting siege shields to provide cover from ranged fire
        NOT OK: Creating a weapon rack and spawning more than a few items to block movement
    If you're stuck, change team to spectators or rejoin the server, otherwise you will be considered a leecher.


Duel mode specific rules

    All types of duels are allowed (ranged, mounted, shield, heavy armor...) if both duelists agree
    No following or face-hugging the other duelist before the duel countdown has ran out - either hold your starting position or back-pedal if you want some distance between you and your opponent
    No running away or going into unreachable places


Siege mode specific rules

    No opening the gates as defender
    No stopping on ladders and blocking your team-mates on purpose



Breaking a rule may net you a warning, mute, kick or ban at admin discretion depending on severity of rule broken and player history (yes, repeated offenders are treated more harshly). In minor offences you usually get a written warning first, in more severe cases you might get kicked or even banned immediately.

If you ever get kicked, consider that a serious warning - you are obviously doing something wrong. If you are unsure what it is, re-read these rules and/or ask the admin in question what the kick was for in a civilized manner. If you're a hot-headed type, perhaps take a few minutes to cool off before going back to shout at the admin. Same goes for all interaction with the admins, act properly and you will most likely be received better.

Voted bans last for 1 hour. These cannot be lifted by admins and are automatically removed after the time is passed.

Admin bans can be either temporary (1 hour) or "permanent". Permanent does not mean permanent in most cases, usually it's a day or two. If you are in a rush or think you have been unjustly banned, post in EU or NA unban sections (read the first post and follow the rules). Again, civilized behavior might do you some good, raging/lying just prolongs the duration of the punishment.

Admins are human too, so mistakes can happen. We are terribly sorry for not being perfect and are working on replacing all players and admins with computers for optimal performance.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 13, 2012, 07:39:16 pm
nvm
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: MrShine on July 13, 2012, 09:32:59 pm
Jason pretty much every time I've seen you get banned you come onto this forum to try to nitpick with the admin who banned you.

When muki banned you you were up in arms and tried to spin a ridiculous story about how 'my old friend' is defined in a bunch of ways... yeah sure like you were really calling someone a cigarette  :rolleyes:

Now you're arguing about punctuation, and how because you weren't naked your lack of contribution isn't bannable?

"Common sense" has been the fallback clause since forever, and your arguments have been nothing but absurd.  If anything it seems like you are trying to find that exact point where something is or isn't bannable, and then walk that line as much as you can.  It's not like real life where you can hire a lawyer to dispute punishment based on something petty and minor, this is an internet video game.  If you're acting like a douche, you're going to get banned for it.

You're either a really bad troll who puts a crap ton of effort into his posts, or you're delusional.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: JasonPastman on July 13, 2012, 10:38:38 pm
Jason pretty much every time I've seen you get banned you come onto this forum to try to nitpick with the admin who banned you.

When muki banned you you were up in arms and tried to spin a ridiculous story about how 'my old friend' is defined in a bunch of ways... yeah sure like you were really calling someone a cigarette  :rolleyes:

Now you're arguing about punctuation, and how because you weren't naked your lack of contribution isn't bannable?

"Common sense" has been the fallback clause since forever, and your arguments have been nothing but absurd.  If anything it seems like you are trying to find that exact point where something is or isn't bannable, and then walk that line as much as you can.  It's not like real life where you can hire a lawyer to dispute punishment based on something petty and minor, this is an internet video game.  If you're acting like a douche, you're going to get banned for it.

You're either a really bad troll who puts a crap ton of effort into his posts, or you're delusional.

(click to show/hide)

Then whats the point of the rules?  Furthermore i'm banned cuz of play style not actually breaking any rules
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 13, 2012, 11:36:36 pm
Then whats the point of the rules?
Keep people from ruining the enjoyment of the game for others, and for the amusement of the masses when reading the posts of the minority of people who find themselves in the Ban/Unban section of the forums.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: JasonPastman on July 13, 2012, 11:42:23 pm
My apologies to Tydeus I was wrong and should have followed his interpretation of the rules.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on July 14, 2012, 02:44:35 pm
My apologies to Tydeus I was wrong and should have followed his interpretation of the rules.
Nice
Title: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: stickher on November 06, 2012, 07:07:45 am
he muted me =( for making a joke that alt+x+space ball in rageball makes u double jump) to bad we were in NA1 (battle)
 also muted a bunch of others for "lol's" to him which is abusing admin powers with a boner
(not just him, most admins catch a boner when they have an opportunistic chance to kick/ban someone; when the admins them self's can accuse a person when they are wrong and or leaching/afk even if the person is in the right but the admin has very little to no evidence(which is an assumption by them) to say he/she is leeching when they are most likely not.

PS unmute me no one fell for the obvious joke and its not like all that were muted were making racial comments  or something.
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: Muki on November 06, 2012, 07:16:01 am
I believe your posting in the wrong section

http://forum.meleegaming.com/game-admin-feedback/%28na%29-tydeus/30/

Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: stickher on November 06, 2012, 07:36:05 am
mb didnt Know BTW he said "fus mute is broken for you" cuz of this post i guess hes mad at me for telling the truth will another admin who knows how to be fair and allows to people to have fun in their way the reason we come here, to umute me.
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: Smoothrich on November 06, 2012, 07:39:20 am
alt + x jokes are griefing the chat by getting people to crash their game and are usually punished by a mute.  mutes expire when you leave the server or when an admin gets around to removing it.  not recommended to leave a server and rejoin to begin griefing again when you get muted as an admin might ban you for it.  its not permanent though and not a big deal, just dont make jokes like that again.
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: Muki on November 06, 2012, 07:39:55 am
If you wish to keep complaining about his admining post it in his feedback
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: Miracle on November 06, 2012, 07:40:01 am
Alt-x jokes are generally punished by any admin.  Also, the unmute funtion does glitch sometimes.  The only way to unmute is to leave and rejoin.  I would make sure he gives you the ok to do that though, as leaving and rejoining to circumvent a mute is a bannable offense.
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: stickher on November 06, 2012, 07:43:31 am
its a big deal to mute for it come on im trying to prove all admins get a boner when they can use power when their right or wrong mostly wrong

but in my case sure its right but is it so little he should bother to mute all that did it together for the lols

POINT IS admins need to learn how to be fair (abuse/USE power for pleasure)
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: Miracle on November 06, 2012, 07:45:40 am
Muting you for typing something in chat that is considered griefing and has caused many, many people before you to get muted is unfair?  If he didn't mute you, then you may have a case for abuse/unfairness.
Title: Re: Tydeus needs to lose power like Most admins(badmins)
Post by: Bobthehero on November 06, 2012, 07:46:15 am
No, abusive admins best admins, see: Taleworlds forum, best place to hang around with, where Mods get muted for drunken ramblings and admins reign supreme till they call some bitch a cunt.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Equal on January 25, 2013, 05:06:36 pm
I don't even think this admin has read the rules.  He banned me on NA today for some made up version of leeching.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,35866.0.html

Atleast I'm not the only one.

Questionable admin decisions, although I do like that he actively enforces rules. Jimmies get rustled a tad easier than others.

8/10 would QQ again
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on January 27, 2013, 01:29:26 am
Kicked me on NA3 while I was waiting for a strat battle.  I was just standing there and he didn't even fight in the strat battle.  Had to ask another admin why I was kicked because Tydeus would not even tell me why I was kicked.  The other admin said he said I knew what I did. Didn't know waiting for a strat battle on Na3 was against the rules.

Shouldnt be hard to warn or even tell me if i was doing wrong.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Penguin on February 07, 2013, 11:29:16 pm
If he goes by Semenstorm_Bigoli, he has randomly kicked me several times with no reasons given, almost every time he gets on. He also ignores most of the teamwounding going on in the server and instead kicks/bans people based on his own personal grievances or at his clan members bidding. I apologize if I have the wrong guy or am posting in the wrong topic.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Sir Ryden on February 11, 2013, 01:09:16 am
Fat
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Le_Mikz on February 16, 2013, 06:48:41 am
http://forum.meleegaming.com/na-%28official%29/citadel-ruins-na-crpg-1/

 Tydeus:
 "While he may have started the issues..."
 "He" (his friend?) didnt get kicked or banned. But i got kicked and banned..

 No need more words.
Title: Re: Locking down your own fief to prevent an attack
Post by: Goretooth on March 31, 2013, 07:40:53 am
I'm fairly sure I replied to you more than once. But here's the rub: What exactly do you want us to do? It's a complaint about a problem that happened months ago that is based only off of what you said and that one other admin was in the server when it happened, and at the time the admin in question didn't seem to think it was important enough to say anything about it, or post about it on our private admin forums. We can't check the logs from that time period because they were broken, but even if we could, you waited over a month to raise your voice over the issue and couldn't direct us to a specific timeframe anyway.

Talking with the admins who were there, the supposed culprit and the witness, didn't result in much. What do you want to have happen, someone to lose admin over such a nebulous claim? We can't do anything about your issue because there's nothing real to base action upon. If we didn't respond, it was because we had nothing further to say.

I'll ask you kindly to drop the issue and I am letting you know that I'll do my best to keep an eye on all the admins and try to curb situations like this as/before the arise.

Edit for clarity: The strat issue that's actually at hand in this thread is still valid and you guys are very welcome not to drop it, as it should still be addressed, there's just nothing the NA admins can do, and until/unless the devs respond, nothing will happen.
Just amazed you let your admins abuse the system without warning or punishment and yet my witness you say is another admin. I mean I would like to know why I was kicked is that too much to ask? He won't tell me nor will you. I can just be simply kicked without warning or reason is what you are telling me? at any moment for just waiting for a strat battle to start. I will not drop it until I get some real answers as to why I was kicked and why he won't tell me I why I was kicked.

Guess other admins that witnessed it and remembered what happened aren't real enough to base anything on lol
I find Goretooth getting upvotes by FCC in this thread should say something as well. They have probably felt the abuse I have from the same admins and ignoring us and later sayhing "Oh well you waited too long." while reporting it months ago like this the thread below.

http://forum.meleegaming.com/game-admin-feedback/(na)-tydeus/45/
Title: Re: Re: Locking down your own fief to prevent an attack
Post by: Canary on March 31, 2013, 09:26:21 am
Just amazed you let your admins abuse the system without warning or punishment and yet my witness you say is another admin.

For the record, this happened when Shik was still technically in charge. Him deferring all responsibility to me didn't mean that I realized was in charge of every part of managing NA administration, or that I'm any more capable of finding out what happened.

No one is "letting my" admins abuse the system, this is a scenario without straight answers. It would be extreme to - do what, exactly? Deadmin Tydeus? Based on one player report with one admin corroborating to some degree (only that the deed happened, not that it was necessarily unjustified) and no other proof? I'll ask him about it again, but don't be surprised if nothing changes.

I mean I would like to know why I was kicked is that too much to ask? He won't tell me nor will you. I can just be simply kicked without warning or reason is what you are telling me? at any moment for just waiting for a strat battle to start. I will not drop it until I get some real answers as to why I was kicked and why he won't tell me I why I was kicked.

I won't tell you because I can't tell you, I know hardly anything about the incident, despite talking with both of the admins that were there. I don't know why he won't tell you, but supposedly you "know what you did", I guess that was an incorrect assumption on his part.

If admins are kicking people without cause, then no, I absolutely won't allow that to go on. It is difficult to uphold the rules if the people being punished under them don't understand why they're being punished. If they refuse to understand, though, they're still subject to being punished.

There's no actual indication that the admin acted unduly, despite the testimony you and the other admin have given. 

Guess other admins that witnessed it and remembered what happened aren't real enough to base anything on lol

What he said was as indeterminate as what you are saying for actually proving this as a case of abuse.

I find Goretooth getting upvotes by FCC in this thread should say something as well. They have probably felt the abuse I have from the same admins and ignoring us and later sayhing "Oh well you waited too long." while reporting it months ago like this the thread below.

http://forum.meleegaming.com/game-admin-feedback/(na)-tydeus/45/

You didn't report an incident in November until late January, that makes it more difficult to understand and deal with. There's no way to see for certain what actually happened, and as such I won't take action because to do so otherwise would be irrational. Discussing the matter, as we found out, didn't help us get to the bottom of it.



Now would you please take this unrelated issue elsewhere besides the strategus issues board?
Title: Re: Re: Locking down your own fief to prevent an attack
Post by: Goretooth on March 31, 2013, 09:46:30 am
For the record, this happened when Shik was still technically in charge. Him deferring all responsibility to me didn't mean that I realized was in charge of every part of managing NA administration, or that I'm any more capable of finding out what happened.

No one is "letting my" admins abuse the system, this is a scenario without straight answers. It would be extreme to - do what, exactly? Deadmin Tydeus? Based on one player report with one admin corroborating to some degree (only that the deed happened, not that it was necessarily unjustified) and no other proof? I'll ask him about it again, but don't be surprised if nothing changes.

I won't tell you because I can't tell you, I know hardly anything about the incident, despite talking with both of the admins that were there. I don't know why he won't tell you, but supposedly you "know what you did", I guess that was an incorrect assumption on his part.

If admins are kicking people without cause, then no, I absolutely won't allow that to go on. It is difficult to uphold the rules if the people being punished under them don't understand why they're being punished. If they refuse to understand, though, they're still subject to being punished.

There's no actual indication that the admin acted unduly, despite the testimony you and the other admin have given. 

What he said was as indeterminate as what you are saying for actually proving this as a case of abuse.

You didn't report an incident in November until late January, that makes it more difficult to understand and deal with. There's no way to see for certain what actually happened, and as such I won't take action because to do so otherwise would be irrational. Discussing the matter, as we found out, didn't help us get to the bottom of it.



Now would you please take this unrelated issue elsewhere besides the strategus issues board?
Find out why and why he won't tell me. Strange that you talked to him about it already and still haven't got those answered. I didn't say deadmin him or remove his admin. "Know what you did" is a great answer btw. If that is the only answer he will you give I hope you would do more then just ignore me on steam. If not then maybe you should step down and let another do a better job.
I took it to five admins. Only two replied that they would contact you and Tydeus and all I got was silence since January and you asking two questions on steam and then nothing more.

You have already answered and proven that he has kicked me on NA3 and another admin saw it happen and the only answer you got was "know what you did." The other admin who saw it pmed Tydues about it months ago and also got no reply. Guess Tydues barely checks the forums and his pms or is to lazy to send a pm?


I dunno. I was playing with him today, and he seems to be pretty uptight.

In the battle server, he ended up going so far as to shoot me (TK) after I admittedly bumped him by mistake while trying to defend him from incoming range (with my horse even). And this is after a string of events where he shoots arrows into my back (friendly fire).

He said it was a mistake, and he thought that I was the other rider (that was trying to kill him), but besides the same horse, we looked nothing alike.

I'm dubious as to how he gained his power as an admin, and I'm not going to the dev decision to make him an NA admin, but the fact I'm bringing this up should speak against this player as an admin.

I do not believe that revenge TK is justified under any circumstances (especially if it's in the next round after the fact), and it's shameful to have an administrator blatantly use his power to prevent others from kicking him.

Smooth, your points are valid, but they do not exemplify what an admin should be: tolerant, well mannered, and mature. This recount of kicking someone from duels just because he didn't like the way they carried out a duel does not - in any way - warrant a kick, or any use of admin power.

I don't care if you have a shitty day, you don't take it out on the people you serve. Administration is a service to the community, not a baton to play with and swing when you're pissed. If you're having a shitty day, don't fucking play video games. Go to the gym or something productive.
Guess i'm not the only one.
Guess who Farfel is
i was on NA_CRPG-3 dueling and no one was complaining that i threw lances in the fight since throwers are slow in close combat, but i managed well. I dueled Farfel and he starts whining that i shouldn't use lances unless agreed upon so I'm like wtf? I'm a thrower and he's a 2h. It's more than fair for me to be able to throw. Next duel with him he kicks me. i come back and poll a kick for him due to admin abuse and he bans me not even letting the chance for my comrades to have their opinion on this. I declare admin abuse and that he be scowled at due to this recklessness. The classes are balanced so it's supposed to be used to it's utmost advantage. Do you guys agree with me or what?

Regards,

                Arthenon

If he goes by Semenstorm_Bigoli, he has randomly kicked me several times with no reasons given, almost every time he gets on. He also ignores most of the teamwounding going on in the server and instead kicks/bans people based on his own personal grievances or at his clan members bidding. I apologize if I have the wrong guy or am posting in the wrong topic.
Semenstorm_Bigoli is Tydeus btw  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Re: Locking down your own fief to prevent an attack
Post by: Canary on March 31, 2013, 04:14:10 pm
Find out why and why he won't tell me. Strange that you talked to him about it already and still haven't got those answered. I didn't say deadmin him or remove his admin. "Know what you did" is a great answer btw. If that is the only answer he will you give I hope you would do more then just ignore me on steam. If not then maybe you should step down and let another do a better job.
I took it to five admins. Only two replied that they would contact you and Tydeus and all I got was silence since January and you asking two questions on steam and then nothing more.

You have already answered and proven that he has kicked me on NA3 and another admin saw it happen and the only answer you got was "know what you did." The other admin who saw it pmed Tydues about it months ago and also got no reply. Guess Tydues barely checks the forums and his pms or is to lazy to send a pm?

I didn't mean to imply that the answer I got was as mysterious as the apparent circumstances of your kick supposedly seemed to you. The fact that you were kicked does not mean that it was unjustly deserved.

We looked into it, I looked into it. That's not much I can do, in the end, because there's no indication that I should take any further action, even one as simple as addressing another admin's actions by talking to him about it. I have, incidentally, been trying to addess you and your complaints, yet in spite of politely asking you to drop a four month old issue or at least take it where it belongs you won't stop raising a stink over it in the wrong place. I can only guarantee that I'll keep an eye out for future circumstances.

I did talk to Tydeus again, though.

Quote from: Tydeus
What I remember and told shik when he asked about it, is that goretooth was was running around on the duel server blocking the movement of players that were actively participating in duels. I warned him, then he started doing it to me, so I gave him a short ban, just long enough to keep him out of the strat battle that was about to happen. He says "even though another NA admin witnessed it" where the other NA Admin... after Goretooth was banned, entered into a cav duel(with whom I forget), and started riding into me and my opponents with his horse. I don't mean this happened once or twice, this entire thing happened over the course of about 20 minutes. In (his) case, I specifically went out of my way to seek duels in a wide range of locations to eliminate any chance that I was simply the unlucky  individual experiencing the extreme berth required in cav duels. Yet when I was certain and thus called (him) out on what he was doing in admin chat, the harassment stopped.

...as it would appear my memory was incorrect, in that I didn't even ban him, I simply kicked him from the server. Still, interesting that the 'harassment' stopped(otherwise I would have continued and actually banned him.

Since the logs from the time period were broken and and are unavailable, and since the exact time period is unknown, "November" is all you said if I recall, there's nothing more to be said. If you have any further concerns take it to where it belongs, the admin feedback board.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on March 31, 2013, 05:52:25 pm
I was standing there not moving waiting for a strat battle like I always do. Everyone knows that I just stand still in NA3 before all strat battles. What he told you is completely false, did he actually say I was riding around on a horse? And I wasn't banned I was kicked.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on March 31, 2013, 10:59:54 pm
I was standing there not moving waiting for a strat battle like I always do. Everyone knows that I just stand still in NA3 before all strat battles. What he told you is completely false, did he actually say I was riding around on a horse? And I wasn't banned I was kicked.

You're still pursuing internet justice for a simple kick given to you in January (or even earlier?).

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Ganner on April 01, 2013, 08:01:44 am
You're still pursuing internet justice for a simple kick given to you in January (or even earlier?).

(click to show/hide)

Gore is the c-RPG elephant, he never forgets.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on April 01, 2013, 08:10:47 am
Gore is the c-RPG elephant, he never forgets.
Ganner is correct and also man enough to admit mistakes and own up to them. Doubt Tydeus will do the same.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Tydeus on April 01, 2013, 08:36:14 am
Ganner is correct and also man enough to admit mistakes and own up to them. Doubt Tydeus will do the same.
I do this when necessary, yet there was no mistake here and thus nothing to apologize for. Tell you what though, as soon as you apologize for all the grievances you caused when you had admin, I'll apologize to you for whatever made-up action you want. I mean, if you're going to go back 6 months for a measly kick, we might as well go back two years for the mass bans you unjustly issued. Of course, I'll personally be expecting an apology from you.

This is the last you'll hear from me on this subject, as I try to stay clear of drama/QQ threads.

Cheers.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on April 01, 2013, 08:43:03 am
I do this when necessary, yet there was no mistake here and thus nothing to apologize for. Tell you what though, as soon as you apologize for all the grievances you caused when you had admin, I'll apologize to you for whatever made-up action you want. I mean, if you're going to go back 6 months for a measly kick, we might as well go back two years for the mass bans you unjustly issued. Of course, I'll personally be expecting an apology from you.

This is the last you'll hear from me on this subject, as I try to stay clear of drama/QQ threads.

Cheers.
:mrgreen: I'l apologize to the mass banned victims of LLJK which I later joined after doing.  Glad you are sticking to the past with admins abusing their powers guess you don't want to be an admin for long nor change. Guess the reason for you kicking me was a mass banning that happened two years ago on different servers?

I mean I find it funny you won't talk about what happened and why you kicked me. Instead you talk about something I did two years ago which you weren't involved in. If you wanna talk about what happened two years ago or why you kicked me i'm game. If you wanna go hide again go ahead it's your choice but I ain't going anywhere nor will I stop seeking justice for this.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on April 01, 2013, 08:52:49 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgGrZYu0TII

Well if it's going back two years ago..
Title: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Sir_Hans on April 15, 2013, 06:39:25 pm
Kicking me repeatedly in DTV for no reason.

First time he said he kicked me for teamwounds, but they were before the countdown timer when they do no dmg but are reportable... But then the person teamwounds me with no enemies around and Tydeus proceeds to kick me after I ctrl-m.

Second time he just kicked me for being teamwounded by another player. and I told him I was being teamwounding and he should kick the person.
So he kicks me.

Expecting to be kicked more as I rejoin DTV. Maybe someone should get in hear and just observe his admin abuse. He's definitely using his admin feature to be a troll with his friends...
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Sir_Hans on April 15, 2013, 06:45:51 pm
He says the 2nd kick was for not having weapons/ not participating.

And now hes threatening to perma ban me If i don't stop using rocks w/ no armor.

Again now hes threatening to ban me now because he says I was "greifing someoen in chat"

I asked him what I said that was griefing and he doesn't go into detail at all or tell me how I am breaking the rules.

Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Sir_Hans on April 15, 2013, 06:48:41 pm
Bump, this guy is abuse kicking me in DTV and threatening ban for rules that I'm not breaking...

Hes pretty much kicking me for pissing off his chevalier buddies... and then just trying to come up with an excuse afterwards....

Now having to resort to running fraps to catch him kicking me for no valid reasons.

Very trash admin, imho.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on April 15, 2013, 09:19:26 pm
"halp halp im being oppressed"

welcome to cRPG
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on May 09, 2013, 03:24:04 pm
Bump, this guy is abuse kicking me in DTV and threatening ban for rules that I'm not breaking...

Hes pretty much kicking me for pissing off his chevalier buddies... and then just trying to come up with an excuse afterwards....

Now having to resort to running fraps to catch him kicking me for no valid reasons.

Very trash admin, imho.
I got kicked for waiting on NA3 For a strat battle. Atleast he gave you a reason for the kick where i did not recieve.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: betard_lulz on June 20, 2013, 03:28:21 pm
http://forum.meleegaming.com/general-discussion/na-admins-these-days/
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Goretooth on June 20, 2013, 05:06:52 pm
http://forum.meleegaming.com/general-discussion/na-admins-these-days/
You're dense. It was a joke because your ignorance(I'm just going to assume it's ignorance as the only other alternative requires you to be an idiot) was irritating. I also have/had the characters: Farfalle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farfalle), Bigoli (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigoli), Campanelle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanelle), Gigli (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigli), Bucatini (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucatini), Croxetti (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croxetti), Angel_Hair, and others that I'm sure I have forgotten. It's just the theme I chose to use for my alts nearly 2 years ago.

Please pull your head out of your anus.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Fearvich on August 12, 2014, 04:39:05 am
Heavy handed of late.

Snarky since always.
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on August 12, 2014, 06:31:23 am
woah I did not know tydeus was an admin for so long. huh
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: Tydeus on August 12, 2014, 03:45:17 pm
woah I did not know tydeus was an admin for so long. huh
Canary and I were the first Official NA Admins.  8-)
Title: Re: [NA] Tydeus
Post by: oralroberts on September 08, 2014, 07:47:51 pm
I don't believe!!!  Where's my helmet???  :cry: