cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 06:59:43 pm

Title: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 06:59:43 pm
We were discussing this yesterday and a little today, i know some EU players are up for this, and i'm sure some NA players would be too, this is just an idea mind, we could have a battle on both servers, 60 vs 60 of the best players EU and NA has to offer, same map, winner of the most rounds wins, winner gets bragging rights, like i say, this is just an idea, i wouldn't want to be the one to set this up, but what do you guys think, would be fun, no...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 15, 2011, 07:00:47 pm
How would you determine who are the best players?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Osiris on October 15, 2011, 07:01:57 pm
indeed the arguments over who gets to be in the 60 will make this thread worthwhile even if a fight never happens :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Paul on October 15, 2011, 07:02:01 pm
EU wins, it's a default win.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 07:03:42 pm
Well as an EU player, you surely know who's a good player, NA will obviously know who there best players are, let's just say 60 good players, i'm sure both sides could come up with that... :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 15, 2011, 07:05:07 pm
Well as an EU player, you surely know who's a good player, NA will obviously know who there best players are, let's just say 60 good players, i'm sure both sides could come up with that... :P

Good luck with that. With some of the egos in this mod it will be a tough task
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 07:06:04 pm
Maybe so, but it's just an idea and a bit of fun at the end of the day...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vibe on October 15, 2011, 07:08:20 pm
You can't really play this game seriously with 100+ ping, how do you propose we get around that?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Huey Newton on October 15, 2011, 07:10:12 pm
Best players as in best duelists, seige heroes or best on battle servers?

Also 2 battles 1 eu 1 na?

I don't know much about computers and stuff, but someone told me EU has fiber optic shit or something.
Which means their ping on NA is better than most NA players on EU.
That isn't meant to sound like an excuse of course. Just putting it out there I suppose

How many cav, ranged?
Armor restrictions?
Maps?
Time limits
etc
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Polobow on October 15, 2011, 07:10:40 pm
I don't think there is a server availible exactly in the middle of NA and EU.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 15, 2011, 07:12:20 pm
You can't really play this game seriously with 100+ ping, how do you propose we get around that?

They all play in Russian servers lol. Or Chinese :D

Also inb4 eurofanboys.

USA USA USA USA USA!

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 15, 2011, 07:16:41 pm
NA has no skilled players and EU is full of autoblockers. AUS wins by default.

If you must, just duke it out on strat for epeen.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 07:19:25 pm
Alot of us have had battles during the last strat on EU and NA servers, as ping is a pain, it's not impossible to play, we could probably get some good rounds going on both servers, regardless, a battle of x amount of rounds on both servers, as for how many cav, armour restrictions etc, if everyone was up for this, we could sort all that out at the time, but looking at the comments so far, it's looking like knowone is interested anyway, i just thought it would be a good laugh... :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 15, 2011, 07:21:07 pm
NA has no skilled players and EU is full of autoblockers. AUS wins by default.

If you must, just duke it out on strat for epeen.

Actually Chinese got the best players. Trust me. It's like 1000 phyrex and 1000 Goretooth combined into 1.

They can also hover and fly with just using their mind.

And they can break rocks with their Chi. I heard.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 15, 2011, 07:21:39 pm
I would be up for this.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kingtrisp on October 15, 2011, 07:22:25 pm
Bad idea is bad it would never work


.....


unless you got the 60 players from both teams to have a lan in iceland...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 07:24:36 pm
Why not, did you not play in any of the strat battles where it was EU vs NA, we had some good fucking fights...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Huey Newton on October 15, 2011, 07:26:06 pm
Why not, did you not play in any of the strat battles where it was EU vs NA, we had some good fucking fights...

hahah we did, but lets make sure this battle isn't at a shitty time ;)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 15, 2011, 07:26:17 pm
Main problem is that there is a clear difference between Someone who is a great duelist and someone who is great in battle, and all the morons who can't tell the difference.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Remy on October 15, 2011, 07:26:50 pm
I thought battle was duel mode?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dezilagel on October 15, 2011, 07:27:03 pm
Main problem is that there is a clear difference between Someone who is a great duelist and someone who is great in battle, and all the morons who can't tell the difference.

Eh...?

derp?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 15, 2011, 07:32:58 pm
I don't think it would be that hard to organize this, as i stated, this is just an idea, and i'm just throwing the suggestion out there, anyway, i must be off for now, i'll read the rest of the thread when i get back...

EU vs NA, are you man enough ?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 15, 2011, 07:35:44 pm
Eh...?

derp?
Example: BKS_Rhade who is the best native duelist , wins all tournaments, is hell on wheels on cRPG Duels, yet in battle is only 'good' not the 'best' because unlike his clanmate Tyrian, Rhade has garbage battlefield awareness, gets shot to shit and has less experience fighting multiple people at once.

At least for NA there would be never ending arguements on who is the best and who gets in the 60.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Huey Newton on October 15, 2011, 07:37:52 pm
Example: BKS_Rhade who is the best native duelist , wins all tournaments, is hell on wheels on cRPG Duels, yet in battle is only 'good' not the 'best' because unlike his clanmate Tyrian, Rhade has garbage battlefield awareness, gets shot to shit and has less experience fighting multiple people at once.

At least for NA there would be never ending arguements on who is the best and who gets in the 60.

well we could always look at the
NA Alarm list
NA Watch List
NA Game Changers

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 15, 2011, 07:51:02 pm
well we could always look at the
NA Alarm list
NA Watch List
NA Game Changers

visitors can't see pics , please register or login



I support this!  :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dezilagel on October 15, 2011, 07:52:34 pm

Herp-derp didn't understand post.

At least for NA there would be never ending arguements on who is the best and who gets in the 60.

Lol.

Reading comprehension 10/10

Just decide on a central leadership and have them elect 60 peeps for example, it's not the end of the world.

I really don't see how this could be a problem at all. If you have 100 000 whiny kids then just let them whine.

A real problem though is the rules; if we have unclarities I doubt there will be a single unbiased indivdual to judge.

Anyways, I think this will work best if set up as a "just for fun"-event. While there without doubt will be some epeen-obsessed individuals QQing. If we just keep it relaxed I think this could prove to be great fun.

Maybe even set it up as a continous event? If this turns out successful, doing it once a month (ok, mustering 60 peeps every month might be hard) would make for increased interraction between EU and NA (something I find lacking atm) methinks.

Wow what a shitty post this became  :o
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Cyber on October 15, 2011, 07:59:56 pm
Unless one side is clearly better im pretty sure both sides would win all rounds on their servers, ping makes too much of a diffrence. I Remember duelling a NA player in both servers, ended up in me losing 0-7 in NA and winning 7-0 in EU.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 15, 2011, 08:00:16 pm
Lol.
We should all hold hands and dance around a flower poll singing hymes.

If we just keep it relaxed

cRPG Community relaxed? Right... because Strat has proven just how relaxed thie cRPG community is, especially considering EU  vs NA :rolleyes:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: rustyspoon on October 15, 2011, 08:06:24 pm
Fantastic idea! If there's one thing we need more of it's retarded NA vs EU arguments.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 15, 2011, 08:29:35 pm
Fantastic idea! If there's one thing we need more of it's retarded NA vs EU arguments.  :rolleyes:

Knife > Fork > Spoon
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kabookie on October 15, 2011, 08:31:54 pm
Let's have a free for all, instead of trying to limit to the elite few.
I sometimes am able to play on EU servers, where my ping is like 145, and it does as well or better than the erratic ping of NA servers (35 to 745 ping).
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: _GTX_ on October 15, 2011, 08:35:20 pm
This sounds epic, and rly could be awesome to do. But collecting 60 of the best from both places...... Just that is extremly hard. And im worried that the ping will do a too big difference so this will just be: Na wins on na, eu wins on eu.

But if someone is up for organizing this from na and eu, then it could be sweet.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 15, 2011, 08:58:55 pm
Could it be a suggestion that the cRPG community builds an island in the middle of NA and EU and we host our own servers there?

So Kinngrimm doesn't have his unfair advantage anymo- eh so we have equal pings.  :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dalhi on October 15, 2011, 09:00:51 pm
I doubt that it will ever happen, but it's just my guess.
Apart from that, I played few times on NA servers, in strageus, cRPG battles or even back in Native. It's not fun at all, and I have no idea why would anyone be interested in playing with 150 ping it's just waste of time... besides:
EU wins, it's a default win.
:P

The only thing that might be interesting and may bring some fun is a topic where you'd pick whose 60 players  :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Arrowblood on October 15, 2011, 09:06:40 pm
everyone over gen 30  :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Mithus on October 15, 2011, 09:10:57 pm
I play on both servers EU and NA, and watch people playing a lot as spec, if would be possibly to have a neutral ground with people with the same ping, I would bet my cRPG money on NA side.  EU has more numbers of good players, but if we had the top 10 of each side, I would bet money on NA side.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thucydides on October 15, 2011, 09:15:24 pm
you guys need to relax on the E-peen
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Remy on October 15, 2011, 09:20:25 pm
Everyone sucks, true story.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Torben on October 15, 2011, 09:47:54 pm
I would really like to see this.  not because of us-eu,  but because i enjoy huge scale battles,  especially with highly skilled players.

if only we could keep the hate out of it,  but i think it would induce too much flaming : /

specially cause EU kicks US ass anytime, anywhere.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fba8PTx0fVE

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: _GTX_ on October 15, 2011, 10:14:25 pm
I play on both servers EU and NA, and watch people playing a lot as spec, if would be possibly to have a neutral ground with people with the same ping, I would bet my cRPG money on NA side.  EU has more numbers of good players, but if we had the top 10 of each side, I would bet money on NA side.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 15, 2011, 10:19:02 pm
This thread, so full of shit.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tennenoth on October 15, 2011, 10:21:54 pm
I'm all for this, I think it would be good. It doesn't just come down to "player skill" as opposed to "teamplay skill" as well, this would also be an issue if you think about it but it doesn't matter all that much if this is relaxed and "for the fun of it".

Picking the players wouldn't be a massive problem because you'd need more than 60 people anyway to cover for the disappearance of some people, life throws stuff at you and you can't always play. On top of that each side should elect a "central board" who would make final decisions on who to put in, a panel of more or less neutral and trusted players, i'm sure that there are a few names from both sides that could be added to do this.

Sounds like it could be good fun it organised correctly.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 15, 2011, 10:34:14 pm
And im worried that the ping will do a too big difference so this will just be: Na wins on na, eu wins on eu.
Do three rounds on the NA server, then switch to EU and do three rounds. If either teams gets a majority of the victories they win. Casualties should be counted after every round so that if both teams win their three rounds the team that suffered the least casualties in total wins.

That should be a fair solution and not at all hard to carry out.

For the selection of the players, it won't be the absolute top 60, cause you will never get them all together at the same time. Just pick a date, let people sign up. Put a council together for each team that picks the best out of the sign ups. Join ts, play and let EU celebrate their victory. It's really not all that hard.

My only concern is the timezone difference, one team is going to get majorly fucked over because they have less players available due to shitty time. Thats why I suggest putting the battle on the NA server on EU primetime, and putting the EU battle on NA primetime. So that the better selection of players goes to the team with shitty ping. Alternatively you could also find a time thats equally shit for both teams and do the matches back to back.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: _GTX_ on October 15, 2011, 10:48:35 pm
Do three rounds on the NA server, then switch to EU and do three rounds. If either teams gets a majority of the victories they win. Casualties should be counted after every round so that if both teams win their three rounds the team that suffered the least casualties in total wins.

That should be a fair solution and not at all hard to carry out.

For the selection of the players, it won't be the absolute top 60, cause you will never get them all together at the same time. Just pick a date, let people sign up. Put a council together for each team that picks the best out of the sign ups. Join ts, play and let EU celebrate their victory. It's really not all that hard.

My only concern is the timezone difference, one team is going to get majorly fucked over because they have less players available due to shitty time. Thats why I suggest putting the battle on the NA server on EU primetime, and putting the EU battle on NA primetime. So that the better selection of players goes to the team with shitty ping. Alternatively you could also find a time thats equally shit for both teams and do the matches back to back.

Exactly, the one organizing this is gonna get quite a hard time. Which is what i said first. But anyway, if someone is up for it. And yeah this is some good rules regarding the way to calculate winner.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Chasey on October 15, 2011, 11:09:26 pm
but but if everybodys good there'll be no peasants for me to kill to raise my kd nooooooooo :cry:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Stabby_Dave on October 15, 2011, 11:18:01 pm
60 vs 60 may be too much since not that many people seem up for this. If someone wants to get this going, just create a list of 30 players and have people suggest additions/removals.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 15, 2011, 11:31:04 pm
60 vs 60 may be too much since not that many people seem up for this. If someone wants to get this going, just create a list of 30 players and have people suggest additions/removals.
Don't create a list, what use is a list if half of them can't show up at the actual date of the battle. If you want drama try to make a list of best players. Let people signup for a specific date and time and let some council pick the best out of those.

Get a few veterans and experienced teamplayers from a variety of clans and they will be able to pick the cream of the crop. 

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Osiris on October 15, 2011, 11:33:52 pm
i want to see a list of 60 best eu players so i can see the QQ from those not included :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tomas on October 16, 2011, 12:28:15 am
Do three rounds on the NA server, then switch to EU and do three rounds. If either teams gets a majority of the victories they win. Casualties should be counted after every round so that if both teams win their three rounds the team that suffered the least casualties in total wins.

That should be a fair solution and not at all hard to carry out.

For the selection of the players, it won't be the absolute top 60, cause you will never get them all together at the same time. Just pick a date, let people sign up. Put a council together for each team that picks the best out of the sign ups. Join ts, play and let EU celebrate their victory. It's really not all that hard.

My only concern is the timezone difference, one team is going to get majorly fucked over because they have less players available due to shitty time. Thats why I suggest putting the battle on the NA server on EU primetime, and putting the EU battle on NA primetime. So that the better selection of players goes to the team with shitty ping. Alternatively you could also find a time thats equally shit for both teams and do the matches back to back.

A variation on this could be that on the first Sunday of every month we hold an NAvsEU day.  The day alternates between NA and EU servers and each day consists of 1 round on 3 different maps.  The maps will be announced beforehand so teams can plan and there should be 1 city map, 1 open Cav map and 1 village/ruins map.  This way the organiser only has to worry about 1 server at a time.  Scores can be tracked a put on to an overall leader board

As for picking the teams, the simple way to do that is via Generals.  Anybody who wants to be a general puts their name forward, stating whether they are NA or EU.  All names then go into a single vote and the top 3 people from each side become the official Generals.  It is a single vote so that people can either choose to vote a good general in for themselves or vote a bad general in for the opposition.  They cannot do both.  The generals then take it in turns to lead and when it is their turn they have absolute control over who is in their team.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 16, 2011, 01:23:30 am
List of 58 for a 40 v. 40 matchup (no shows or can't make it)
(Did this just off the top of my head, so please don't be offended if I forgot you, just mention it so I can add if needed

1.  Cyranule_BRD
2.  Man_of_War_Chaos
3.  Dan_CHEATS
4.  Rohypnol
5.  Cavalieres_Huey_Newton
6.  LLJK_Smoothrich
7.  Fallen_Loki
8.  sWalker_Marskman_Unicorns
9.  Damatacus_ATS
10.  Sequel_BRD
11.  Kesh_Unicorns
12.  Grey_Chaos
13.  Wallace_BRD
14.  Rhaelys_of_Chaos
15.  LLJK_Goretooth
16.  Junior_Scrambler_of_Chaos
17.  Darkkarma_of_Chaos
18.  BaleOhay_BRD
19.  Qildji_Arslan_ATS
20.  Canary_of_Chaos
21.  Marcus_Aurelius_of_Chaos
22.  Occitan_Snipslot
23.  Occitan_Arrowaine
24.  Uncle_Adoptagoat_TkoV
25.  Allers
26.  Miley
27.  Occitan_Kap10
28.  Ryden_of_Chaos
29.  Dextaa_of_Chaos
30.  Cavalieres_Edmond
31.  Fallen_Homey/Vic
32.  Matey_BRD
33.  Governor_Unicorns
34.  USA_BADPLAYER_AMERICA
35.  Walt_F4
36.  Balbaroth
37.  Chaos_Takeda
38.  Hospitaller_TommyHu
39.  Mr_Pibb_ATS
40.  Duke_of_Disco_BEATS
41.  Murchad
42.  GrandMaster_Tankman_Ootl
43.  Weebo_Of_Chaos
44.  nK_Givi_the_Swordsman
45.  Hudson_Of_Chaos  (new name???)
46.  Silveredge
47.  Hospitaller_Spaniard
48.  ZyloRage
49.  Palatro_ATS
50.  SaulCanner_Of_Chaos
51.  BigSandwich_Of_Chaos
52.  TheSerge_Of_Chaos
53.  Beeper_Of_Chaos
54.  LLJK_Lockt
55.  A_BEAR_IRL
56.  Galgorth_dfc
57.  Tydeus_dfc
58.  Occitan_Shinock

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Darkkarma on October 16, 2011, 01:39:46 am
I agree with Badplayer playing for NA, despite being from Britain.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Edmond_The_Red on October 16, 2011, 01:41:35 am
And Bad's ping is usually better than mine. FML
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BADPLAYERold on October 16, 2011, 01:42:14 am
I agree with Badplayer playing for NA, despite being from Britain.

English by blood, American by soul!

also Amatsuka and Duke_of_Disco_BEATS, imo the 2 best HA/XBOW on NA.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Huey Newton on October 16, 2011, 01:47:36 am
Balbaroth
Chaos_Takeda
Hospitaller_TommyHu
Mr_Pibb_ATS
Valt_ATS
Murchad
GrandMaster_Tankman_Ootl
Weebo_Of_Chaos
nK_Givi_the_Swordsman
Hudson_Of_Chaos
Silveredge
Hospitaller_Spaniard
ZyloRage
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 16, 2011, 02:01:04 am
Balbaroth
Chaos_Takeda
Hospitaller_TommyHu
Mr_Pibb_ATS
Valt_ATS
Murchad
GrandMaster_Tankman_Ootl
Weebo_Of_Chaos
nK_Givi_the_Swordsman
Hudson_Of_Chaos
Silveredge
Hospitaller_Spaniard
ZyloRage

Added, though Hudson has had a new name for months now, just can't recall off-hand.  Also, included Palatro_ATS.  I knew about Badplayer, but I consider him an american with his tag and also him playing 100% of the time on NA.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 02:02:06 am
SaulCanner_Of_Chaos
BigSandwich_Of_Chaos
TheSerge_Of_Chaos
Beeper_Of_Chaos
LLJK_Lockt
A_BEAR_IRL
Galgorth_dfc
Tydeus_dfc
Occitan_Shinock

Few more people, mostly fellow duelist bros that perform very well on battle.

Would love to see these EU vs NA battles happen, especially if everyone changes their names to USA_NAME_AMERICA for the event.

God Bless America
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 16, 2011, 02:07:35 am
Added, though Hudson has had a new name for months now, just can't recall off-hand.  Also, included Palatro_ATS.  I knew about Badplayer, but I consider him an american with his tag and also him playing 100% of the time on NA.

Put great mentor Allers higher up on the list naow!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Summer Glau on October 16, 2011, 02:17:23 am
SaulCanner_Of_Chaos
BigSandwich_Of_Chaos
TheSerge_Of_Chaos
Beeper_Of_Chaos
LLJK_Lockt
A_BEAR_IRL
Galgorth_dfc
Tydeus_dfc
Occitan_Shinock

Few more people, mostly fellow duelist bros that perform very well on battle.

Would love to see these EU vs NA battles happen, especially if everyone changes their names to USA_NAME_AMERICA for the event.

God Bless America

I am offended that NA's only professional MLG player did not make your list. Also reported.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 16, 2011, 04:27:50 am
SaulCanner_Of_Chaos
BigSandwich_Of_Chaos
TheSerge_Of_Chaos
Beeper_Of_Chaos
LLJK_Lockt
A_BEAR_IRL
Galgorth_dfc
Tydeus_dfc
Occitan_Shinock

Few more people, mostly fellow duelist bros that perform very well on battle.

Would love to see these EU vs NA battles happen, especially if everyone changes their names to USA_NAME_AMERICA for the event.

God Bless America

Added.  Wonder what the EU roster will look like.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Patricia on October 16, 2011, 05:08:20 am
Lol, Kesh adding himself to the top 60 roster, nice joke.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 05:12:28 am
Lol, Kesh adding himself to the top 60 roster, nice joke.

Kesh is one of the top NA archers *shrugs* At least lately.

Speaking of which, Patricia should be on that list.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 05:13:49 am
What the NA roster needs is more cavalry and archers.

Archer and cav bros pick some of your favs.  We have a TON of polearms and 2 handers on that list, but don't forget EUs can be hard to catch up with, so fill them with ranged and couch them from behind!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Earthdforce on October 16, 2011, 05:15:01 am
I call towel-boy!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: kukufarikki on October 16, 2011, 05:15:28 am
pick me i am way better than darkkarma lady boy no skill girl
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 05:17:06 am
pick me i am way better than darkkarma lady boy no skill girl

You have done better then his 38-0 3 round Acre Server score? Hard to beat Dark Karma's Autoaim cheat.  :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: kukufarikki on October 16, 2011, 05:20:59 am
You have done better then his 38-0 3 round Acre Server score? Hard to beat Dark Karma's Autoaim cheat.  :lol:

he crutches on using melee as a backup and triple heirloomed weapons, no skill NO SKILL LADY BOY
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 05:24:11 am
It is true that LLJK_EAZIO_CROSSBOTORE is a good arbalestman I just feel scrubby recommending too many clan bros
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 16, 2011, 05:25:06 am
1.  Cyranule_BRD
2.  Man_of_War_Chaos
3.  Dan_CHEATS
4.  Rohypnol
5.  Cavalieres_Huey_Newton
6.  LLJK_Smoothrich
7.  Fallen_Loki
8.  sWalker_Marskman_Unicorns
9.  Damatacus_ATS
10.  Sequel_BRD
11.  Kesh_Unicorns
12.  Grey_Chaos
13.  Wallace_BRD
14.  Rhaelys_of_Chaos
15.  LLJK_Goretooth
16.  Junior_Scrambler_of_Chaos
17.  Darkkarma_of_Chaos
18.  BaleOhay_BRD
19.  Qildji_Arslan_ATS
20.  Canary_of_Chaos
21.  Marcus_Aurelius_of_Chaos
22.  Occitan_Snipslot
23.  Occitan_Arrowaine
24.  Uncle_Adoptagoat_TkoV
25.  Allers
26.  Miley
27.  Occitan_Kap10
28.  Ryden_of_Chaos
29.  Dextaa_of_Chaos
30.  Cavalieres_Edmond
31.  Fallen_Homey/Vic
32.  Matey_BRD
33.  Governor_Unicorns
34.  USA_BADPLAYER_AMERICA
35.  Walt_F4
36.  Balbaroth
37.  Chaos_Takeda
38.  Hospitaller_TommyHu
39.  Mr_Pibb_ATS
40.  Duke_of_Disco_BEATS
41.  Murchad
42.  GrandMaster_Tankman_Ootl
43.  Weebo_Of_Chaos
44.  nK_Givi_the_Swordsman
45.  Hudson_Of_Chaos  (new name???)
46.  Silveredge
47.  Hospitaller_Spaniard
48.  ZyloRage
49.  Palatro_ATS
50.  SaulCanner_Of_Chaos
51.  BigSandwich_Of_Chaos
52.  TheSerge_Of_Chaos
53.  Beeper_Of_Chaos
54.  LLJK_Lockt
55.  A_BEAR_IRL
56.  Galgorth_dfc
57.  Tydeus_dfc
58.  Occitan_Shinock
59.  LLJK_EAZIO_CROSSBOTORE
60.  Patricia
61.  Invicti_Despot_MrShine
62.  30_Seconds_to_Mars


OFFICIAL MASCOT FOR NA: GOD_BALTON_THE_BENEVOLENT
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thomek on October 16, 2011, 05:25:12 am
Set up a server in Iceland.

I know one icelandic player, but there might be more. How is your ping to the US servers?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Patricia on October 16, 2011, 06:09:52 am
Kesh is one of the top NA archers *shrugs* At least lately.

Speaking of which, Patricia should be on that list.

Ah, if he's adding himself as an archer I can more or less agree.

As a melee though, nooooooope.

I also really really hope Rohypnol's there as a cavalry because on foot he just swings wildly and damage half his teammates just for 1 kill, it's really obnoxious and whenever I end up near him accidently, I get hit 4 times for every hits he get on an actual enemy.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 16, 2011, 06:15:52 am
Ah, if he's adding himself as an archer I can more or less agree.

As a melee though, nooooooope.

Man, who put a dick up your ass???  Never mind, don't need to know who your gay lover is.  I put myself ona s archer, but my melee alts all can consistently top the charts, its called manual blocking and practice.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Darkkarma on October 16, 2011, 06:18:51 am
Man, who put a dick up your ass???

Gaffer and I
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: MrShine on October 16, 2011, 06:21:15 am
1   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
2   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
3   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
4   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
5   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
6   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
7   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
8   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
9   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
10   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
11   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
12   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
13   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
14   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
15   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
16   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
17   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
18   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
19   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
20   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
21   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
22   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
23   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
24   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
25   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
26   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
27   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
28   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
29   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
30   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
31   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
32   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
33   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
34   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
35   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
36   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
37   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
38   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
39   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
40   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
41   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
42   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
43   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
44   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
45   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
46   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
47   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
48   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
49   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
50   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
51   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
52   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
53   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
54   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
55   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
56   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
57   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
58   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
59   Invicti_Despot_MrShine
60   Invicti_Despot_MrShine


Seriously 5 pages and no one has done this yet what's wrong with all of you.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BADPLAYERold on October 16, 2011, 06:23:24 am
1   Invicti_Despot_MrShine



Seriously 5 pages and no one has done this yet what's wrong with all of you.

I was gonna post you and 30_seconds_to_mars but forgot to, if its any consolidation  :wink:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Patricia on October 16, 2011, 06:29:41 am
Man, who put a dick up your ass???  Never mind, don't need to know who your gay lover is.  I put myself ona s archer, but my melee alts all can consistently top the charts, its called manual blocking and practice.

It's mostly the fact that I've fought you alot and your manual blocking skill aren't all that good, they're about average.

Same goes for every other important aspect of combats I might rate you on.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: MrShine on October 16, 2011, 06:31:40 am
I was gonna post you and 30_seconds_to_mars but forgot to, if its any consolidation  :wink:


Well that wasn't really my point, I was meaning that this will just turn into the usual epeen fest with people considering themselves to be in top players and including a large amount of their clan mates etc


Baaaawww <3
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 06:33:10 am
That seems really pointless though as you would not be fooling anyone... *shrugs* I suppose there are enough delusional people, or jokers flattering clan mates.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Balton on October 16, 2011, 06:36:59 am
NA gets trolled way too easily, EU gets default win for not making fools of themselves.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Uumdi on October 16, 2011, 06:39:58 am
Our Balton, for thine is the kingdom, the power, and the glory, for all of eternity.  Amen.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Huey Newton on October 16, 2011, 06:48:54 am
well lets see
we already had the
alarm list
watch list
game changers

I guess we could call this

All stars or something

also if balton is on NA side we win by default
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 07:00:56 am
nice to see three circle jerk threads weren't enough for NA, now we get to witness the fourth
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 07:04:19 am
nice to see three circle jerk threads weren't enough for NA, now we get to witness the fourth

EU did start it this time...

It will take a long time for me to forgive you Lizardman...

NA has had more then a few though. Alarm list, then Alarm List 2, then "Best player" then "favorite player" shortly after, then after a while the thread by weigraf... and now this thread but by an EU guy. So not counting this thread, NA is up to five.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 16, 2011, 07:04:31 am
Updated
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Darkkarma on October 16, 2011, 07:12:45 am
nice to see three circle jerk threads weren't enough for NA, now we get to witness the fourth

Didn't you guys turn the last NA circle jerk into your own shitty EU variant?

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 07:15:21 am
EU did start it this time...

No it didn't. Lizard started a thread about EU vs NA battle, which NA quickly turned into a circle jerk. I've yet to see a single circle jerk post from any EU players.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 07:18:18 am
No it didn't. Lizard started a thread about EU vs NA battle, which NA quickly turned into a circle jerk. I've yet to see a single circle jerk post from any EU players.

Bull fucking shit. Lizard man started a thread which involved "Get the best players (starting a circle jerk)" we just happen to be more organized due to past experience and pumped out our list of the 60 top NA players first.

We fulfilled our end of the bargain of the Original post, now where is the EU list you lazy dogs!  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BADPLAYERold on October 16, 2011, 07:18:28 am
No it didn't. Lizard started a thread about EU vs NA battle, which NA quickly turned into a circle jerk. I've yet to see a single circle jerk post from any EU players.

Probably because there aren't any good EU players.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 07:19:38 am
Probably because there aren't any good EU players.

shh, don't reveal the real reason behind why EU doesn't have any circle jerk threads
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 07:20:05 am
shh, don't reveal the real reason behind why EU doesn't have any circle jerk threads

You technically have one, this one.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 07:21:23 am
You technically have one, this one.

it's not an eu circle jerk thread before someone makes a circle jerk eu list
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 07:24:59 am
it's not an eu circle jerk thread before someone makes a circle jerk eu list

I will update as needed

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Braeden on October 16, 2011, 07:29:21 am
  • Momo
  • Leshma
  • Xant
  • Xant
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Al_Adin
  • Ja_Far
  • Leshma
  • Siiem
  • Fallen_Ramsex
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Jiggles
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Fallen_Torben
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • chadz
  • Leshma
  • Thomek_The_Badmin_Ninja
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Fallen_Cyber
  • Leshma
  • Cicerio_The_Incredibly_Retarded_but_Skilled_Crutches_on_Armor_Polearm_dude
  • Leshma
  • Espu_The_Cultured
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Xant
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • OkiN
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Fasaderp_the_loved
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Pault
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Random_Dude
  • Leshma
  • Leshma
  • Pebble_Pusher_Nerf_Throwing
  • Leshma

That is definitely the best possible list.  Now someone just needs to make an EU list.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 07:32:57 am
That is definitely the best possible list.  Now someone just needs to make an EU list.

Agreed. The NA list won't get more solid than that.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 07:55:51 am
Updated...

Did I miss anyone?

So there you go, the EU list.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 08:23:18 am
Only counts as another NA circle jerk list because it was made by an american.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Paul on October 16, 2011, 09:50:09 am
To be honest we only need to send in Al_Adin as our avatar for EU. He will burn the NA heretics with fiery justice and purge the unclean tea pushers from above with a tempest of flames.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Uumdi on October 16, 2011, 09:53:44 am
60.  You

D'awww, You shouldn't have.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 10:45:45 am
Fancy image and updated list provided by famed graphic designer/muted forum troll A_BEAR_IRL

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vieuxcrotter on October 16, 2011, 10:46:05 am
EU player arent shit they come plague the US servers at night with their noob skills and the server become a fucking disaster.
EU player like to think they are the shit, but its not the case.

Smoothrich: no offense but tons of players in your list are not worth shit, only in my crew there is players 10times better then 90% of these guys.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: FRANK_THE_TANK on October 16, 2011, 10:56:06 am
Come on, it wouldn't measure anything. With the kind of lag you deal with, NA will win all of the NA rounds and EU will win all of the EU round. This is a trololololing if ever I saw.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 11:01:13 am
We have our roster and are ready to go.  Any more posting on the matter is a waste of time.

Pick your team and lets set a date, and see which side is more american.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vieuxcrotter on October 16, 2011, 11:02:33 am
So basicaly you just pick up your friends to make a roster or peoples you know, and you dont actually take the real best players.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Iymore on October 16, 2011, 11:04:49 am
  • The_Cyber_Camel_who_cheated
  • FUCK
  • You
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 11:05:39 am
The EU List - in no particular order


1. Georges ( i start with him cause im gay)
2. Chase
3. Bjord
4. Xant/Siem (they count as one)
5. Cyber (not the shitty one obviously)
6. Phyrex
7. Dave
8. Cooties
9. Ironlake
10. Tor
11. Unreal
12. Dado
13. Khorin
14. Jormglorm (i might have misspeled this)
15. Ujin
16. Lizard Man
17. Torben
18. Leed
19. Ramses
20. Cicero
21. Muffin
22. Ccoin
23. Jambi
24. Saint
25. Bars
26. Dimaurban
27. Oberyn
28. Sonja
29. Pully
30. Murmi
31. Kingrimm
32. Nebun
33. Gtx
34. Vicious
35. Xqua
36. Wookie
37. Arked
38. Hideyoshi
39. Tommy
40. Superbeast
41. Malahostia
42. Wulz
42. Melas
43. Saveliy
44. Mustikki
45. Crafty
46. Lars
47. Corrado
48. Greifen



I made this list in like 10 min just listing names out the back of my head soo im leaving 10 slots open for people i forgot and should be here - if you think you should be here post :)

Also if you think some1 shouldnt be here also post it

P.S. Grey order has some fine players, i cant seem to remember any of their names. Perhaps i drank to much Jager last night and my brain cells are a bit fried - post your best please

P.P.S. Did i miss any of the crpg legends? (Forgive me if yes i started playing in december)


LET THE E-PEEN COMPETITION BEGIN
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BlackMilk on October 16, 2011, 11:09:58 am
Olwen and Phase dont even play crpg anymore. :D

Also, you've missed Dave and Vicious. :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 11:11:21 am
Olwen and Phase dont even play crpg anymore. :D

Also, you've missed Dave and Vicious. :D

I didnt miss Dave :)

Hm yea i probably should remove people that dont play anymore (removing Gnjus *cry*)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 11:12:07 am
So basicaly you just pick up your friends to make a roster or peoples you know, and you dont actually take the real best players.

Umm.. what?  Care to make a list?  Maybe people on that list can scrim against everyone on your list and see what happens :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 11:15:51 am
The EU List - in no particular order

(click to show/hide)

I made this list in like 10 min just listing names out the back of my head soo im leaving 10 slots open for people i forgot and should be here - if you think you should be here post :)

Also if you think some1 shouldnt be here also post it

P.S. Grey order has some fine players, i cant seem to remember any of their names. Perhaps i drank to much Jager last night and my brain cells are a bit fried - post your best please

P.P.S. Did i miss any of the crpg legends? (Forgive me if yes i started playing in december)


LET THE E-PEEN COMPETITION BEGIN

Updated: removed Olwen, Phase, Gnjus (dont play)

There are now 12 free spots
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 11:43:53 am
god damnit fluffy

there goes our moral highground
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 12:14:34 pm
Who is this Wulz, Saveliy? I've never heard of them.  :lol:

Really good players:
Atze (22nd)
Daergar (Risen)
PolePoop (Templar)
Thovex (Risen)
Razzen (Risen)
Intermezzo ()
Micah (Former SoA/Camel)
Crojo (Risen)
Hetman (Grey)
Okocha (Grey)
Al_Adin (chadz)

We can duel to take someone else's place.  :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Osiris on October 16, 2011, 12:15:14 pm
chadz on a carpet with fire stick of doom = instant win
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 12:23:23 pm
The EU List - in no particular order


1. Georges ( i start with him cause im gay)
2. Chase
3. Bjord
4. Xant/Siem (they count as one)
5. Cyber (not the shitty one obviously)
6. Phyrex
7. Dave
8. Cooties
9. Ironlake
10. Tor
11. Unreal
12. Dado
13. Khorin
14. Jormglorm (i might have misspeled this)
15. Ujin
16. Lizard Man
17. Torben
18. Leed
19. Ramses
20. Cicero
21. Muffin
22. Ccoin
23. Jambi
24. Saint
25. Bars
26. Dimaurban
27. Oberyn
28. Sonja
29. Pully
30. Murmi
31. Kingrimm
32. Nebun
33. Gtx
34. Vicious
35. Xqua
36. Wookie
37. Arked
38. Hideyoshi
39. Tommy
40. Superbeast
41. Malahostia
42. Wulz
42. Melas
43. Saveliy
44. Mustikki
45. Crafty
46. Lars
47. Corrado
48. Greifen



I made this list in like 10 min just listing names out the back of my head soo im leaving 10 slots open for people i forgot and should be here - if you think you should be here post :)

Also if you think some1 shouldnt be here also post it

P.S. Grey order has some fine players, i cant seem to remember any of their names. Perhaps i drank to much Jager last night and my brain cells are a bit fried - post your best please

P.P.S. Did i miss any of the crpg legends? (Forgive me if yes i started playing in december)


LET THE E-PEEN COMPETITION BEGIN
Nice no archers 8)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 12:24:11 pm
jambi isn't an archer?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 12:31:25 pm
Also mustikki
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 12:31:37 pm
Without my old friendchers and xbowmen you'll never win. People like Fasader, Varyag or even Agor could be much more useful than some smelly old 2H duelist.

Also Bjord can't play battle, he has shitty PC.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 12:35:26 pm
Nice no archers 8)

but yea good point

added:

Gisbert
Bambi
Cupid
Tenne
Varyag
Fasaderp
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: [ptx] on October 16, 2011, 12:36:18 pm
Wow, you actually picked this up...
E-trousers must be bursting... :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: OttomanSniper on October 16, 2011, 12:38:10 pm
NA is fat, best players in EU
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 16, 2011, 12:40:34 pm
Funny how you guys are all eager to make these lists while this is a ridiculously inefficient way too actually organize an event like this, which I would actually like to see. Creating a list of the 60 best doesn.......ahh fuck it I'll dig up my earlier post.

Don't create a list, what use is a list if half of them can't show up at the actual date of the battle. If you want drama try to make a list of best players. Let people signup for a specific date and time and let some council pick the best out of those.

Get a few veterans and experienced teamplayers from a variety of clans and they will be able to pick the cream of the crop.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 12:42:44 pm
I find this thread lol

hence the lolist

NA did one, so why shouldnt we?  :D

LET THE EPEEN COMPETITION RESUME
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 12:47:31 pm
yeah what teeth said. make your fantasy lists all you want but how many of those people actually wanna show up
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 12:48:42 pm
nevermind this is more like a popularity name contest than actual fighters for most of the list.

some of these guys you got to be trollin'  :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 16, 2011, 12:51:48 pm
It just makes me sad that this turned into an E-peen contest and that we never will see an actual EU vs NA matchup, which I think could be very fun.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 12:52:56 pm
Add Hanzo...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 12:56:05 pm
Forgot Kansuke and Gurny (Gurnisson) as well..
Sinj and Five might be a good pick as well ,saw them playing yesterday...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kansuke on October 16, 2011, 12:58:35 pm
Individual Duel Tournament (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,6254.0.html)
Individual Duel tournament 2 (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,6632.0.html)

 :rolleyes:

Also, where are Rey, Lor, gorN, Okocha, Darkfox, Logen, Kpu, Nokey... don't forgot the earstern EU dudes...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 01:00:00 pm
It just makes me sad that this turned into an E-peen contest and that we never will see an actual EU vs NA matchup, which I think could be very fun.

It'll just turn into epic nationality flaming wars.  :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 01:02:05 pm
DaveUKR as well.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 01:02:13 pm
Individual Duel Tournament (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,6254.0.html)
Individual Duel tournament 2 (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,6632.0.html)

 :rolleyes:

Also, where are Rey, Lor, gorN, Okocha, Darkfox, Logen, Kpu, Nokey... don't forgot the earstern EU dudes...
+1 ,even tho some good duelists suck in battle sometimes...
But the guys you added don't ,not sue if Rey still plays tho.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 01:02:59 pm
Sinj and Five might be a good pick as well ,saw them playing yesterday...


They are terrible archers lolz, and play in 1st person mode...

If it's going to be 10 vs 10 I would personally pick 4 cav, 2 swordsmen, one axemen, an archer, xbowmen and shielder. Or:

Leed
Oberyn (TomMYy)
Kastamonulu
Casimir
Chase
Phyrex
Tor
Jambi
Varyag
Kinngrimm (or Punisher)

That would be my pick and I'm 100% sure such team would win every time in 10 vs 10 against NA players.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 01:05:46 pm

They are terrible archers lolz, and play in 1st person mode...

If it's going to be 10 vs 10 I would personally pick 4 cav, 2 swordsmen, one axemen, an archer, xbowmen and shielder. Or:

Leed
Oberyn (TomMYy)
Kastamonulu
Casimir
Chase
Phyrex
Tor
Jambi
Varyag
Kinngrimm (or Punisher)

That would be my pick and I'm 100% sure such team would win every time in 10 vs 10 against NA players.

I'd want to see that, who is Kastamonulu?

And Casimir just mad.  :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: SchokoSchaf on October 16, 2011, 01:09:45 pm
That list is like a national football team - all lot of good people not cooperating. There's a reason why spain became world champion - most of them play together the whole year.

Btw has nobody a spare oil rig we could plant in the atlantic? We could form the independet state of calradia and set up the server on it. There's already somewhere another autonomous "oil rig country" in the world.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 01:09:55 pm

They are terrible archers lolz, and play in 1st person mode...

If it's going to be 10 vs 10 I would personally pick 4 cav, 2 swordsmen, one axemen, an archer, xbowmen and shielder. Or:

Leed
Oberyn (TomMYy)
Kastamonulu
Casimir
Chase
Phyrex
Tor
Jambi
Varyag
Kinngrimm (or Punisher)

That would be my pick and I'm 100% sure such team would win every time in 10 vs 10 against NA players.
lol'd Sinj and Five are terrible...
That explains why they're often on the top of the scoreboard.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 01:12:20 pm
lol'd Sinj and Five are terrible...
You good sir have no idea what you're talking about

Of course they are terrible. They work together yet I'm able to approach them while they are at 5 meter distance from each other and kill first then second while having no shield and fighting in the open... First guy didn't even see me cause he was using 1st person view ie. idiot.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 01:13:04 pm
lol'd Sinj and Five are terrible...
That explains why they're often on the top of the scoreboard.

Yep, and Kinngrim is nowhere near the best shielder of EU... no offence to him.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 01:13:24 pm
That list is like a national football team - all lot of good people not cooperating. There's a reason why spain became world champion - most of them play together the whole year.

Btw has nobody a spare oil rig we could plant in the atlantic? We could form the independet state of calradia and set up the server on it. There's already somewhere another autonomous "oil rig country" in the world.

Aye I'd rather have a team of Risens that co-operate together than a bunch of "famous" people thrown together into a group.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 01:16:18 pm
The EU List - in no particular order

(click to show/hide)

I made this list in like 10 min just listing names out the back of my head soo im leaving 10 slots open for people i forgot and should be here - if you think you should be here post :)

Also if you think some1 shouldnt be here also post it

P.S. Grey order has some fine players, i cant seem to remember any of their names. Perhaps i drank to much Jager last night and my brain cells are a bit fried - post your best please

P.P.S. Did i miss any of the crpg legends? (Forgive me if yes i started playing in december)


LET THE E-PEEN COMPETITION BEGIN

Updated: added 55. Rey

56. Lor
57. Gurni
58. kansuke
59. Okocha
60. Hanzo

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 16, 2011, 01:16:45 pm
(click to show/hide)

Dammit the amount of C's and M's

And a couple more Eastern Europe people, but my western brain can't recall or spell their names correctly.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 01:17:08 pm
stop it already goddamnit
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 01:18:45 pm
The EU List - in no particular order

(click to show/hide)

I made this list in like 10 min just listing names out the back of my head soo im leaving 10 slots open for people i forgot and should be here - if you think you should be here post :)

Also if you think some1 shouldnt be here also post it

P.S. Grey order has some fine players, i cant seem to remember any of their names. Perhaps i drank to much Jager last night and my brain cells are a bit fried - post your best please

P.P.S. Did i miss any of the crpg legends? (Forgive me if yes i started playing in december)


LET THE E-PEEN COMPETITION BEGIN

Updated: added 55. Rey

56. Lor
57. Gurni
58. kansuke
59. Okocha
60. Hanzo
Who's Wulz,Bars and Murmi?
No offence to them but...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 16, 2011, 01:18:53 pm
stop it already goddamnit

This is fun  :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 01:19:01 pm
I'd want to see that, who is Kastamonulu?

And Casimir just mad.  :P

Kastamonulu is Bashibazouk and he's 2H cav (Morningstar) and while not being among the very best he and Leed work very well together. There is no 2H pro who is able to kill either of them if they decide to team up on him. Believe me such duo can kill not two good twohanders, it can kill whole team of twohanders.

Casimir is also 2H cav but still excellent on foot. Players like that are extremely dangerous, much more than Chase and Phyrex and co.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 01:19:19 pm
Just to piss Xant off I'll make my own list. :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 16, 2011, 01:20:51 pm
Who's Wulz,Bars and Murmi?
No offence to them but...

Wulz is a Kapikulu HA that doesn't play anymore, Bars a Druzhina that had mastered the Long Voulge but now that is has lost the side swings I don't know what he's doing, Murmi is Murmillius_Prime.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 01:22:07 pm
Yep, and Kinngrim is nowhere near the best shielder of EU... no offence to him.

True, but he has an awlpike which makes him more useful than your regular pro shielder. Also Sultan Eren is more useful in group fights than any pro 1H shielder because he's a hoplite.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 01:24:49 pm
Who's Wulz,Bars and Murmi?
No offence to them but...

Wulz was a HA, contrary to what Kafein thinks he still plays (polearm now - Bashibazouk_Wulzcan) and is quite good.

Druzhina_Bars is know for his long voulge mastery- after the long voulge nerf he plays with other polearms, equaly efficient.

Murmi is former wolves now Bashibazouk_Murmilus_Prime the 2hander

And they remain on my list  :wink:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Razzer on October 16, 2011, 01:26:01 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 (http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=5snatcher_011hx5e.jpg)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 01:26:21 pm
Wulz was a HA, contrary to what Kafein thinks he still plays (polearm now - Bashibazouk_Wulzcan) and is quite good.

Druzhina_Bars is know for his long voulge mastery- after the long voulge nerf he plays with other polearms, equaly efficient.

Murmi is former wolves now Bashibazouk_Murmilus_Prime the 2hander

And they remain on my list  :wink:

I'm glad that you didn't put yourself on your list because you suck.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 01:29:12 pm
Lol is that supposed to offend me?

I know im nowhere near the required skill for top 60
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kansuke on October 16, 2011, 01:30:17 pm
More awesome shielder missing: Renegat, TuckMunck, Dahli, DRZ_Otec
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 01:32:12 pm
Yes! How could i forget the Wolper guy, he is realy good. About Otek - i think you mean Otec which on my list is Saively so he is on. Ill put Dahli also
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: SchokoSchaf on October 16, 2011, 01:37:47 pm
More awesome shielder missing: Renegat, TuckMunck, Dahli, DRZ_Otec
TuckMunck's no shielder no more. I knowz
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 01:40:40 pm
All this shielder talk made me remember Renegat, gonna add him. Hm but who to remove now? Any suggestions?

Also VMEGA - shit i forgot him

And rhygar gah :S

60 ppl is too short
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Jarlek on October 16, 2011, 01:53:12 pm
All this shielder talk made me remember Renegat, gonna add him. Hm but who to remove now? Any suggestions?

Also VMEGA - shit i forgot him

And rhygar gah :S

60 ppl is too short
Only for EU :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 01:55:29 pm
Lol is that supposed to offend me?

I know im nowhere near the required skill for top 60

You're nowhere near top 500...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Thovex on October 16, 2011, 01:57:34 pm
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 01:58:12 pm
Yes, so what?

Edit: ah yes polepoop, wayne and micah thanks for reminding me
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 16, 2011, 02:05:50 pm
Wulz was a HA, contrary to what Kafein thinks he still plays (polearm now - Bashibazouk_Wulzcan) and is quite good.

My mistake :(


Also, there are a few other good HRE players missing. The one with the HBS for example (Nestor, Nestario, Nessario... I forgot)

And many 22nd that don't play cRPG much but still have a char, like Harlequin.

Pecores and friends that might fit in this list :

Bambi (already in)
Blackbow
Coin (already in)
Jeanne
LaHire
Mendro

There also are very good Camelscreamers (Conny for example)


EDIT : how could I forget Wayyyyne x)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Stabby_Dave on October 16, 2011, 02:07:13 pm
TuckMunck's no shielder no more. I knowz

Tuckmunck is HA now i think. Saw him the other day beat Atze in a duel with 0ps and 0wpf :shock:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 02:07:16 pm
Yeah 60 slots is waaaaaay to few for all the good names out there
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 16, 2011, 02:20:07 pm
Chuck Norris When Phyrex walks on the battlefield everyone who sees his mask falls down to the ground and dies by a heart attack.

Phyrex doesn't stand on the ground. The ground stands on Phyrex.

Phyrex can heal his teammates by stabbing them in the face.

Phyrex can lolstab Earth to spin 50 000 times around Phyrex.

Phyrex doesn't cry for help, help cries for Phyrex.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BadLoR on October 16, 2011, 02:21:59 pm
also Lezard,Henk,Paul,BaldRider dont forget about 22nd guys
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 16, 2011, 02:27:15 pm
Chuck Norris When Phyrex walks on the battlefield everyone who sees his mask falls down to the ground and dies by a heart attack.

Phyrex doesn't stand on the ground. The ground stands on Phyrex.

Phyrex can heal his teammates by stabbing them in the face.

Phyrex can lolstab Earth to spin 50 000 times around Phyrex.

Phyrex doesn't cry for help, help cries for Phyrex.

Heheh i remember applying for the duel turnament and getting Phyrex in the very first round.

Was like: oh shi.... didnt even prepair cause i knew twas hopeless :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Chasey on October 16, 2011, 02:30:51 pm
olwen still plays btw just under a secret nick
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Iymore on October 16, 2011, 02:33:14 pm
My mistake :(


Also, there are a few other good HRE players missing. The one with the HBS for example (Nestor, Nestario, Nessario... I forgot)

And many 22nd that don't play cRPG much but still have a char, like Harlequin.

Pecores and friends that might fit in this list :

Bambi (already in)
Blackbow
Coin (already in)
Jeanne
LaHire
Mendro

There also are very good Camelscreamers (Conny, Diagonal, The Stig, ROBİNHOOD(Skilled Archer) for example)


EDIT : how could I forget Wayyyyne x)

And Camelscreamers old players so good. expamle: Mete_Khan, Shanks, Micah and some other guys :(
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 16, 2011, 02:59:39 pm
Well I suppose there's no chance there is actually going to be such an event. Funny how putting the term 'best 60' in a thread, makes the thread immediately dedicated to discussing who these best 60 are instead of just discussing the actual topic.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 16, 2011, 03:13:47 pm
Well I suppose there's no chance there is actually going to be such an event. Funny how putting the term 'best 60' in a thread, makes the thread immediately dedicated to discussing who these best 60 are instead of just discussing the actual topic.

..yep. this topic has nothing to do with the actual suggested battle event now.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 03:27:30 pm
And Camelscreamers old players so good. expamle: Mete_Khan, Shanks, Micah and some other guys :(

Yeah, we should totally listen what autoblocker has to say :rolleyes:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Iymore on October 16, 2011, 03:45:18 pm
Go cry chadz :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dezilagel on October 16, 2011, 06:26:40 pm
How would you determine who are the best players?

First reply.

Thread went downhill after that  :|

 
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: MrShine on October 16, 2011, 06:32:03 pm
The thread never was 'uphill'.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 06:32:33 pm
Wait... I just noticed that I am on the NA list... Who put me on that?! Between me and Huey, no team mate would be safe from TKs :( I need to convince Soup or SaifaQc to come back from break and take my spot.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Blueberry Muffin on October 16, 2011, 06:33:16 pm
I can only approve.

How bout for selection we get clans you enter into this. each clan that goes forward gets to put forwards their best 5-8 players depending on how many clans choose to participate.

That would be a way to get the 60 players.

Then we can have a 60 man battle on a private server from eu and na.

sounds like a laugh if it can be organised. Im all for it.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Earthdforce on October 16, 2011, 06:37:56 pm
I can only approve.

How bout for selection we get clans you enter into this. each clan that goes forward gets to put forwards their best 5-8 players depending on how many clans choose to participate.

That would be a way to get the 60 players.

Then we can have a 60 man battle on a private server from eu and na.

sounds like a laugh if it can be organised. Im all for it.
What about clanless players?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Winterly on October 16, 2011, 06:38:38 pm
HEY TYDEUS, when are the "organized battle events" going to start? :[
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leshma on October 16, 2011, 06:42:59 pm
What about clanless players?

They suck.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 16, 2011, 06:46:40 pm
Guys we just call Deadliest warrior. Send in our list of top 60 players and run it through the battle simulation!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 07:09:52 pm
Funny how already there is far more infighting and ego strutting amongst EU players then the united NA.  Also stop shit posting about how "this is never gonna happen"  it was suggested like a day ago and we just came up with decent rosters.  We could organize these events for a weekend afternoon for us/early evening for you guys or something whenever, if people step up for the hosting.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tennenoth on October 16, 2011, 07:16:37 pm
Tennemoth

I see the light! HOLY SHI!!!!

Why am I on this list  :| There are so many better choices.

(click to show/hide)

But anyway, to go back a decade of pages, the original post was not supposed to be anything like an E-peen war between EU and NA, it was supposed to be a friendly match between them to help bridge the gap between the continents.
We both play this game but we don't play together often, we see each other on the forums but in honesty we have little experience of these people, their skills, their temporments and I believe that LizardMan was merely trying to help bridge the gap in a bit of fun using a common ground.

But on the other hand... (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAaAuiZh3Os)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Casimir on October 16, 2011, 07:33:49 pm
im joining the na team
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 16, 2011, 07:44:28 pm
In order to organise the event, each continent has to come up with a roster somehow. Sharing lists like that is a way to do it. This is not an e-peen contest, this is not about who's better than who.

And anyway, it is likely that on a given date and hour, not even half of the 60 chosen people will be there, so we need many many substitutes. With that many people, the skill level will be over-average, not ultra-1337

I personally consider this more like a show.


Funny how already there is far more infighting and ego strutting amongst EU players then the united NA.  Also stop shit posting about how "this is never gonna happen"  it was suggested like a day ago and we just came up with decent rosters.  We could organize these events for a weekend afternoon for us/early evening for you guys or something whenever, if people step up for the hosting.

No NA player posted on this thread during the early morning, how surprising  :o
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 16, 2011, 07:53:47 pm
Funny how already there is far more infighting and ego strutting amongst EU players then the united NA.  Also stop shit posting about how "this is never gonna happen"  it was suggested like a day ago and we just came up with decent rosters.  We could organize these events for a weekend afternoon for us/early evening for you guys or something whenever, if people step up for the hosting.
'We just came up with decent rosters'. Compiling a list of players is useless, half of them aren't going to show up. The battle will be at a weird time, cause we are dealing with a 6 hour time difference between these continents.

Set a date and time, let people sign up and then pick the best out of the signups. Who should do the picking? Get a few active and experienced teamworkers and they can put a nice team together.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BADPLAYERold on October 16, 2011, 08:02:32 pm
USA USA USA USA USA USA
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

USA USA USA USA USA USA
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 16, 2011, 09:37:48 pm
This is how EU think NA is (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8STcBRTssTA&feature=related)


 :lol:

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 16, 2011, 10:21:14 pm
im joining the na team

God Bless The United States Of America  :!:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Torp on October 16, 2011, 10:53:22 pm
let the NA/EU community vote for 3 leaders of the fight - they get to choose the team
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Phyrex on October 16, 2011, 11:04:34 pm
I will join Team America(Fuck yeah!), because freedom has no borders(Unless they're from Mexico).
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Diomedes on October 16, 2011, 11:08:43 pm
I felt I should make a post in this thread.  Nailed it.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vieuxcrotter on October 16, 2011, 11:16:23 pm
Question , for you north america = USA ?

Cause in north america there is canada too, and alot of canadians players are way better then americans players.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 16, 2011, 11:17:43 pm
Question , for you north america = USA ?

Cause in north america there is canada too, and alot of canadians players are way better then americans players.

Most EU folk I talk to forget about Canada for some odd reason, despite a very large amount of the NA players being Canadian (and that on a map, Canada takes up a rather obvious chunk of North America).
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: BADPLAYERold on October 16, 2011, 11:20:32 pm
Canada is an unofficial state of the USA.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vikings on October 16, 2011, 11:21:03 pm
Why are you even bothering to do EU vs NA when you can just organise a nations cup like in native :O
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Chasey on October 16, 2011, 11:21:15 pm
Is there anybody actively doing anything about this? because i see alot of posts saying to appoint leaders/generals/councils to give out spaces on the teams but havnt seen any progress. My worry is that this thread is just gonna be all talk with no actual action.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Smoothrich on October 16, 2011, 11:29:14 pm
We find people willing to let use their servers, preferably east coast USA servers and west coast Europe servers, then we make a thread where people can sign up for America or sign up for defeat, set a date and uh, people to be determined later or something (captains) can decide on final team members of people who show up, based on whatever player limit we decide.

I've organized plenty of cRPG bullshit so I'll help out
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tristan on October 16, 2011, 11:32:29 pm
Bring out the vote. Let people nominate themselves and then lets have a vote.

3-5 people with most vote form the "board" and they pick their team?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Chris_P_Bacon on October 17, 2011, 12:02:23 am
Question , for you north america = USA ?

Cause in north america there is canada too, and alot of canadians players are way better then americans players.
I can think of only Memento_Mori being a ridiculously good Canadian. And recently I find myself beating him more and more and I'm not even that great.
Of course if they aren't in DL I wouldn't know if they were Canadian anyway, so I'm sure there are good Canadians I'm just ignorant of.
Aboot.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: hippy_with_a_scimi on October 17, 2011, 12:49:19 am
Quebec vs teh world!

  Vive le quebec libre!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Druss on October 17, 2011, 01:34:20 am
All Occitans are (french) canadians fyi
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Diomedes on October 17, 2011, 02:30:51 am
Supposing he are willing, I guess somebody like Darkkarma could draw up a list of NA members who he'd like to see on an organizing committee.  After a round or two of voting, we'd likely have a trim list of respectable NA community members who could organize 60-70 NA players.  Each week, then, on alternating servers, we could have a scrim run in whatever way by this and an EU committee.  Of course it's not totally "democratic," nor the best plan generally, but I think it could make a fun weekly match.


P.s. I'm Canadian too :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordSnow on October 17, 2011, 08:34:16 am
My mistake :(


Also, there are a few other good HRE players missing. The one with the HBS for example (Nestor, Nestario, Nessario... I forgot)

And many 22nd that don't play cRPG much but still have a char, like Harlequin.

Pecores and friends that might fit in this list :

Bambi (already in)
Blackbow
Coin (already in)
Jeanne
LaHire
Mendro

There also are very good Camelscreamers (Conny for example)


EDIT : how could I forget Wayyyyne x)

And what about your best friend shielder heum!? I mean myself! :mrgreen:

I can buy an e penis too ! All those 2hand are aboooze, let's real player talk i said!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vieuxcrotter on October 17, 2011, 08:50:45 am
Balbaroth is french canadian and probably the best sword and shield player in the game. Hope i spelled is name properly lol
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Darkkarma on October 17, 2011, 08:52:29 am
Quebec vs teh world!

  Vive le quebec libre!

Christ, you're quebecois??
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vieuxcrotter on October 17, 2011, 09:53:46 am
Vive le quebec caliss!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 17, 2011, 09:58:52 am
You think you can set the dates 2-3 months ahead?  :lol:

I'm taking care of school at the moment, my estimate is that if I have enough good grades to show at the end of the year I can rightfully claim my old pc again. (For those of you who don't know or think my parents "took" my computer, I personally suggested the idea that they confiscate it! Ok?! :mrgreen: )

That is, if anyone is serious about this taking place.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 17, 2011, 10:13:18 am
no no bjord, if you get good grades then it just shows that taking your computer from you works and is good, so no reason to give it back
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Ylca on October 17, 2011, 10:27:20 am
Holy crap, i made a list. I'd totally be down.

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 17, 2011, 10:49:45 am
no no bjord, if you get good grades then it just shows that taking your computer from you works and is good, so no reason to give it back

I see you are familiar with the way my parents' logic functions.

Yes, you are right. But if they refuse I will kick and scream like a little boy.  :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Teeth on October 17, 2011, 11:17:11 am
Question , for you north america = USA ?

Cause in north america there is canada too, and alot of canadians players are way better then americans players.
Canada has what, 30 million inhabitants? USA has 250 million?

Besides, the continent is called North America, in which the United States of America are situated. We commonly talk about the USA as America, thats why we easily think of the USA as North America. The USA should just annex Canada if you want us to dont forget you.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: TucKMuncK on October 17, 2011, 01:23:43 pm
Tuckmunck is HA now i think. Saw him the other day beat Atze in a duel with 0ps and 0wpf :shock:

Yes that was my HA alt char. I play infantry polearm nowadays
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Ylca on October 17, 2011, 03:49:34 pm
...and removed. Racism.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: hippy_with_a_scimi on October 17, 2011, 03:57:40 pm
Christ, you're quebecois??
oui oui oui , le Frenchie !
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 17, 2011, 05:27:38 pm
Well, i haven't had chance to read all the posts yet, i tried yesterday but my head was spinning, it's spinning in the other direction today, anyway, sounds like some people are up for this, everyone moaning about this causing more EU NA drama, well, it's simple, if this is organized in any way, don't fucking sign up, this idea was all about a bit of fun, and alot of fun it could be, people moaning about drama are the ones that are causing it...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 17, 2011, 05:34:54 pm
I think you'll find that with attitudes such as yours, not many will feel inclined to sign up.

With that said, if you want this to happen then try a neutral approach. Just ignore the peasant squabble, we will always moan anyway.

I'd be willing to sign up, but depending on when you want this to take place I may not make it.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 17, 2011, 05:36:17 pm
attitudes such as yours

Say what ?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Leesin on October 17, 2011, 05:37:04 pm
This could be fun, but it's hardly going to prove or settle anything, you'll never get a true 60v60 of the -best- players, so whoever loses will want rematch etc etc. Still, it's a fun idea.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 17, 2011, 05:38:27 pm
Say what ?

...everyone moaning about this causing more EU NA drama, well, it's simple, if this is organized in any way, don't fucking sign up, this idea was all about a bit of fun, and alot of fun it could be, people moaning about drama are the ones that are causing it...

Highlighted words for extra clarity.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Lizard_man on October 17, 2011, 05:43:13 pm
This could be fun, but it's hardly going to prove or settle anything, you'll never get a true 60v60 of the -best- players, so whoever loses will want rematch etc etc. Still, it's a fun idea.

Well, the 60 vs 60 part was also part of the idea, that's up for change of course...

Highlighted words for extra clarity.

Lol, so from that post you've decided that i have a bad attitude, don't even begin to think that you know the slightest thing about me Bjord...
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 17, 2011, 05:46:43 pm
Ex Merc vs Merc DRAMA! FFS SOMEONE BRING ME SOME POPCORN NOW!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 17, 2011, 05:48:00 pm
Ex Merc vs Merc DRAMA! FFS SOMEONE BRING ME SOME POPCORN NOW!

Damn you changed your quote from just "E" to the above, but anyway:

E-PEEN - there completed it for you
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 17, 2011, 06:14:53 pm
Lol.

"You don't know me, brah. You don't know me. Don't fucking get close to me, you don't know me."
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 17, 2011, 06:31:46 pm
Lol.

"You don't know me, brah. You don't know me. Don't fucking get close to me, you don't know me."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLrpBLDWyCI&feature=related
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 18, 2011, 07:10:55 am
Drama that's not even entertaining... -.- = boring.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vicious666 on October 18, 2011, 06:01:09 pm
did USa actually have 60 good player?  :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 18, 2011, 06:03:44 pm
did USa actually have 60 good player?  :D

Yeah, we actually had a lot more than EU, had to turn away a couple hundred, still waiting for a complete EU list.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 18, 2011, 06:52:14 pm
Yeah, we actually had a lot more than EU, had to turn away a couple hundred, still waiting for a complete EU list.

You are? Why?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: dynamike on October 18, 2011, 07:29:10 pm
Fancy image and updated list provided by famed graphic designer/muted forum troll A_BEAR_IRL

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Holy... 15 Chaos players on that list!  :D



Also, I request a special category for my 2 handed no-shield light-armor crutch-on-skill-not-polearm cav awesomeness of doomTM!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 18, 2011, 07:30:06 pm
List is a joke list, I'm on it.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Casimir on October 18, 2011, 07:31:03 pm
dynamike is 2h cav!?

HIGH5!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Miracle on October 18, 2011, 07:34:19 pm
His light armor is heirloomed 8 times.  It makes +3 black armor look like a nobleman's outfit.  Don't listen to him.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: dynamike on October 18, 2011, 08:36:35 pm
His light armor is heirloomed 8 times.  It makes +3 black armor look like a nobleman's outfit.  Don't listen to him.

Bwah-ha! My breeches are laced in chili peppers and tabasco sauce - that's what keeps me going  :D


dynamike is 2h cav!?

HIGH5!

You too, my friend?
(click to show/hide)


List is a joke list, I'm on it.

You should be on ANY list!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 18, 2011, 08:50:40 pm

1. Georges ( i start with him cause im gay)
2. Chase
3. Bjord
4. Xant/Siem (they count as one)
5. Cyber (not the shitty one obviously)
6. Phyrex
7. Dave
8. Cooties
9. Ironlake
10. Tor
11. Unreal
12. Dado
13. Khorin
14. Jormglorm (i might have misspeled this)
15. Ujin
16. Lizard Man
17. Torben
18. Leed
19. Ramses
20. Cicero
21. Muffin
22. Ccoin
23. Jambi
24. Saint
25. Bars
26. Dimaurban
27. Oberyn
28. Sonja
29. Pully
30. Murmi
31. Kingrimm
32. Nebun
33. Gtx
34. Vicious
35. Xqua
36. Wookie
37. Arked
38. Hideyoshi
39. Tommy
40. Superbeast
41. Malahostia
42. Wulz
42. Melas
43. Saveliy
44. Mustikki
45. Crafty
46. Lars
47. Corrado
48. Greifen
49. Gisbert
50. Bambi
51. Cupid
52. Tenne
53. Varyag
54. Fasaderp


RUSSIANS ARE NOT EUROS!! @#$&!!!!111!!@#$&! They are Aliens.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 18, 2011, 08:55:23 pm
RUSSIANS ARE NOT EUROS!! @#$&!!!!111!!@#$&! They are Aliens.

Also, I think developers should be ineligible - just because.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: SeQuel on October 18, 2011, 09:51:09 pm
I'm the best archer in CRPG.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Gnjus on October 18, 2011, 09:52:18 pm
I'm the best archer in CRPG.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 18, 2011, 10:21:08 pm
Atleast quote the updated list you dirty little hamleigh  :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Mtemtko on October 18, 2011, 10:24:34 pm
but yea good point

added:

Gisbert
Bambi
Cupid
Tenne
Varyag
Fasaderp

err fasa is an archer? you mean ranged right?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 18, 2011, 10:25:22 pm
Atleast quote the updated list you dirty little hamleigh  :lol:

CBA. The list does not contain yours truly (camping with Xbow at unreachable places with Gmaul Full STR tincan build with no upkeep build).

I am disappoint.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: polkafranzi on October 18, 2011, 10:27:39 pm
CBA. The list does not contain yours truly (camping with Xbow at unreachable places with Gmaul Full STR tincan build with no upkeep build).

I am diappoint.

I am also diappoint.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Fluffy_Muffin on October 18, 2011, 10:29:33 pm
err fasa is an archer? you mean ranged right?

Yep
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 18, 2011, 10:29:47 pm
I am also diappoint.

Fixed, thx for correcting me <3
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Snatch on October 19, 2011, 12:10:58 am
I'm back so you can put me on that list Smoothrash, for horseman.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: dynamike on October 19, 2011, 12:18:08 am
I'm back

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: SeQuel on October 19, 2011, 12:23:58 am
I'm back so you can put me on that list Smoothrash, for horseman.

Who's this guy/girl?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: hippy_with_a_scimi on October 19, 2011, 12:27:19 am
Who's this guy/girl?

A metallic centaur that got ressurected :D , welcome back Gaga hehe
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kenji on October 19, 2011, 12:08:35 pm
NA has no skilled players and EU is full of autoblockers. AUS wins by default.
I only logged on just to agree with this :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: kukufarikki on October 19, 2011, 01:50:52 pm
Who's this guy/girl?

lady of lljk
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: RandomDude on October 19, 2011, 02:00:59 pm
U dont know snatch? Hahaha.

Prepare for a trampling.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 03:48:53 pm
I'm the best archer in CRPG.

That's like saying "I'm the best form of cancer" and being proud of it.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 05:03:44 pm
That's like saying "I'm the best form of cancer" and being proud of it.

Cancer is a natural part of life.  :P

A better comparison would be "I'm a better manipulative asshole then yall and I get ALL DEM BITCHES AND MONIES!" Sure he is an asshole, but he has ALL DEM SHINIES because of it!

Rock on SeQuel, rock on. He mad  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:15:05 pm
NA has no skilled players and EU is full of autoblockers. AUS wins by default.

If you must, just duke it out on strat for epeen.

Default? DEFAULT?

Nah, as Aus has a much smaller playerbase it is in the post-Warband phase where no one  takes the game seriously any more.

Australia however a couple months ago was much better, but really just consisted of everyone just attempting to copy Keen tactics and fighting styles. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, as I've never seen any video of any foreign duel that even approached the quality of a Toad v Thorn fight.

So it is more along the lines of Australia losing by having no one play anymore, but you shouldn't be so quick to dismiss the playerbase.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 05:17:17 pm
f any foreign duel that even approached the quality of a Toad v Thorn fight.

So what exactly was so special about Toad v Thorn fights?  :D
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 19, 2011, 05:18:14 pm
This isn't necessarily a bad thing, as I've never seen any video of any foreign duel that even approached the quality of a Toad v Thorn fight.

Isn't this self-explanatory and also a bit contradictory? :lol:

You're saying you never saw any non-AUS that were as good as.. whoever those two guys are, because you never saw them?  :|
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:23:51 pm
Well, not all duels are recorded from the US and EU servers, but I've certainly watched a few.

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 05:29:00 pm
Well, not all duels are recorded from the US and EU servers, but I've certainly watched a few.

My my, aren't you windswept and interesting.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 19, 2011, 05:30:19 pm
And we can say the same about your alleged superhuman Australian duelists that are so far above the league of us lowly Transatlantics that it astonishes the very fibre of your being.

I mean, how on Earth are we not acknowledging their superior skill!? It is mind boggling, truly.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 05:32:36 pm
Clearly the smallest c-RPG community has developed some never-before-seen tricks in duels that none of us lowly mortals may possibly know! Teach us!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:33:32 pm
And we can say the same about your alleged superhuman Australian duelists that are so far above the league of us lowly Transatlantics that it astonishes the very fibre of your being.

I mean, how on Earth are we not acknowledging their superior skill!? It is mind boggling, truly.


Can't really be explained well in text, but the level of play did have a level of insanity about it. Even hearing a fight over microphone (when they used to play competitively) sounded identical to a professional Korean Brood war player.

Every successful fighting style in Aus was first perfected by them. They are the sorts of players to go up against 20 people single handedly with a one handed sword and no armour and win, consistently. No player has better performed group fighting than them.

It wouldn't be unusual to see them with scores of 50-1, on servers with 60 people in it (i.e, one naked swordsman carrying an entire native 30 player team).

It is hard to articulate the gulf between them and almost everyone else.

Edit: These are native players, who became known as trolls, and did happen to touch the crpg servers with straight to 30s from time to time.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 19, 2011, 05:34:47 pm

Can't really be explained well in text, but the level of play did have a level of insanity about it. Even hearing a fight over microphone (when they used to play competitively) sounded identical to a professional Korean Brood war player.

Every successful fighting style in Aus was first perfected by them. They are the sorts of players to go up against 20 people single handedly with a one handed sword and no armour and win, consistently. No player has better performed group fighting than them.

It wouldn't be unusual to see them with scores of 50-1, on servers with 60 people in it (i.e, one naked swordsman carrying an entire native 30 player team).

It is hard to articulate the gulf between them and almost everyone else.

*cough* autoblock not checked on AUS servers *cough*
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 05:36:20 pm
I suppose Yedrellow is the kind of person that would be amazed that a turtle can turn itself around.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:37:52 pm
You have no idea do you, these people were doing these things back in beta; unless they coded autoblock themselves, they definitely do not use it. You can't dismiss players of their calibre just because you think they can not exist without hacking.

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Bjord on October 19, 2011, 05:38:04 pm
And here you are trying to justify why we should acknowledge them, on their behalf. You do not find this pathetic or in any form or shape, sad?

Just sounds like your sense of proportion is off. If they can beat everyone naked with a 1h sword, the rest of AUS probably just sucks so much it reaches abnormal levels.

You're welcome to post any videos of this gulf you claim is so inarticulable, though.

Seriously... :lol:
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 05:38:09 pm
They are the sorts of players to go up against 20 people single handedly with a one handed sword and no armour and win, consistently.

That just means the other AUS players are awful..
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 05:40:52 pm
You have no idea do you, these people were doing these things back in beta; unless they coded autoblock themselves, they definitely do not use it. You can't dismiss players of their calibre just because you think they can not exist without hacking.

Well how can we acknowledge them when we haven't seen them play... should we just take your word for it that they are the bestest, best of the very best in the game because you said so. And it has also been mentioned that australia has a very small community.

For all we know, they could be salty's in small pond of fish.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 05:41:43 pm
In all seriousness though, AUS don't have anything that the other communities don't have, and vice versa... After a lot of spectating (usually occures after each monthly AUS player posting WE IS DA BEST on these forums) I have yet to see anything that I have not seen on other servers, including native.


Everyone sucks.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:43:19 pm
Eh, there is no point arguing this anymore, you are just going to dismiss them out of hand, the 400 ms latency gulf between our continents means that there's no way I can prove what I am saying to you anyway, short of spending 3000 dollars on a plane ticket or two.

However, admittedly, I am comparing these to RECORDED videos of EU and NA players, there may still be a few players who haven't appeared on youtube yet that are far better than the ones currently on youtube.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 05:44:12 pm
Most top players of every community along with most crap players don't make the youtubes...

Best way is to spectate first hand, like me.

What I find stupid is that most shit talkers claim they know shit but can't name even two dozen top tier players of other communities.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 05:45:06 pm
Eh, there is no point arguing this anymore, you are just going to dismiss them out of hand, the 400 ms latency gulf between our continents means that there's no way I can prove what I am saying to you anyway, short of spending 3000 dollars on a plane ticket or two.

However, admittedly, I am comparing these to RECORDED videos of EU and NA players, there may still be a few players who haven't appeared on youtube yet that are far better than the ones currently on youtube.

You could describe to us what they are doing that is so amazing? If you can't do that, then you don't understand the game mechanics well enough to be an accurate judge of player skill.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:53:14 pm
You could describe to us what they are doing that is so amazing? If you can't do that, then you don't understand the game mechanics well enough to be an accurate judge of player skill.

Alright, blocking efficiency is up to near 99-100% even against lots of 3-5 opponents.

Able to feint extremely quickly (again, quicker than I've seen in any foreign video by 2-3 fold) while maintaining 99-100% blocking efficiency.

Pioneered own movement style for groups, which enables up to 5 opponents to remain suppressed while maintaining blocking/killing efficiency, along with exploiting the increase in speed bonus.

Near 100% Hit Rate on Head, near 0% thud rate from previous speed bonus and head targeting.

An extreme knowledge of stun mechanics, which they abuse quite heavily

When using crossbows, thorn specifically has an extremely high shield bypass rate.

Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: The_Angle on October 19, 2011, 05:56:18 pm
Keshian wasn't here to make a reply to this thread, so he told me to post for him.

Keshian:OMGWTFEUUUSUXORSFACCCKK MUFFAFACCKKERRAMERICA IS FUCK BESTBITCH FUCKOOMMMBBBBBQLS:RKlkrlks
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 05:59:46 pm
Anyway, Australian warband players generally feel obligated to mention these two in any EU v NA circlejerk. My shift is over though, carry on then chaps.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 06:00:38 pm
Alright, blocking efficiency is up to near 99-100% even against lots of 3-5 opponents.

Able to feint extremely quickly (again, quicker than I've seen in any foreign video by 2-3 fold) while maintaining 99-100% blocking efficiency.

Pioneered own movement style for groups, which enables up to 5 opponents to remain suppressed while maintaining blocking/killing efficiency, along with exploiting the increase in speed bonus.

Near 100% Hit Rate on Head

An extreme knowledge of stun mechanics, which they abuse quite heavily

When using crossbows, thorn specifically has an extremely high shield bypass rate.

Oh BULLSHIT

Why is it that everytime I go to the server I don't see more then a handful of people able to do that?!

For the love of god give me your prime time hours so I can witness this for myself.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 19, 2011, 06:01:28 pm
Near 100% Hit Rate on Head


When using crossbows, thorn specifically has an extremely high shield bypass rate.

So all the other AUS players don't know how to upblock???

Lol, shield bypass rate has nothing to dow ith skill, but everything to do with the shield skill of the defender, the shield used and the power of the xbow being used.

Also, thank you Angle, summed up my points well.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Endo on October 19, 2011, 06:01:39 pm
I found a video of Thorn...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaeiFSfqEtQ&feature=related
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:04:33 pm
I found a video of Thorn...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaeiFSfqEtQ&feature=related

Verses Aleczacool. Point is that that is an incredibly one sided contest

Oh BULLSHIT

"Why is it that everytime I go to the server I don't see more then a handful of people able to do that?!

For the love of god give me your prime time hours so I can witness this for myself.Oh BULLSHIT"


I have explained that these two players have retired, that was mentioned in the very first posts.

"So all the other AUS players don't know how to upblock???

Lol, shield bypass rate has nothing to dow ith skill, but everything to do with the shield skill of the defender, the shield used and the power of the xbow being used.

Also, thank you Angle, summed up my points well."

So you are able to protect both your head and feet at the same time?

Congratulations,
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 06:05:24 pm
Rhade is a better player then, from watching this video...

Yeah I can see the block skills right thar yo from his opponents! I t looks!.... normal...

SO MIND TELLING ME WHY THORN REFUSES TO FEINT VERY MUCH?!

If faced against an opponent who blocks most basic attacks... why keep sending basic attacks?!

He gets brownie points for battle kicks and sing the reach of his weapon, and loses points for NEVER EVER trying to feint.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dexxtaa on October 19, 2011, 06:05:44 pm
RedYellow.

We've had a couple of your fighters on the NA servers while they were on business here, most notably Ravelyr of Australia (I believe also known as Thorn).

He fought well, and came into the Chaos TeamSpeak server and hung out with the boys. He's good, no mistaking that, but he did not perform to the 50-1 kdr that you're telling me that so many of your Aus boys do.

As it stands, I've had a good history with the Australians, and I'm extremely biased towards Oz, but the numbers that are rolling off your keyboard are simply preposterous.

My best is 150-14 on the siege server on a single map. Across about 7 rounds.

You're telling me that your boys can produce at least a kill rate of 350 in that same map rotation?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:07:05 pm
RedYellow.

We've had a couple of your fighters on the NA servers while they were on business here, most notably Ravelyr of Australia (I believe also known as Thorn).

He fought well, and came into the Chaos TeamSpeak server and hung out with the boys. He's good, no mistaking that, but he did not perform to the 50-1 kdr that you're telling me that so many of your Aus boys do.

As it stands, I've had a good history with the Australians, and I'm extremely biased towards Oz, but the numbers that are rolling off your keyboard are simply preposterous.

My best is 150-14 on the siege server on a single map. Across about 7 rounds.

You're telling me that your boys can produce at least a kill rate of 350 in that same map rotation?


Ravelyr?

He is John, a second- third tier keen player.

Aleczacool v Thorn looks bad because Aleczacool is bad, simple.

Why do anything particularly spectacular when you can flawlessly win by barely trying.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dexxtaa on October 19, 2011, 06:09:00 pm
Ah, I stand corrected, then.

Your third tier keen player did well.

So you're telling me that your guys can carry a 350 kill rate?

Either they're better than anything NA or EU have seen, or you're fighting peasants by the droves.

I'm willing to bet on the latter. Your attitude is definitely driving me towards being dubious.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 06:09:11 pm
Thorn seems pretty damn good at dancing and holding an attack forever!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 06:10:10 pm
Thorn seems pretty damn good at dancing and holding an attack forever!

And never ever feinting!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: cmp on October 19, 2011, 06:10:49 pm
Shut up guys, you're just jealous.
Thorn is so good he can crushtrough on sideswings.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 06:11:30 pm
And never ever feinting!

Or taking the free chambers that his opponent gives him..

cmp..

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:11:36 pm
Never ever?

Amazing how a joke duel between a below average player and thorn with great long axes of all weapons can indicate to you his normal fighting style.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 06:11:52 pm
He uses a different kind of Daveukr tactic of boring people to death, instead of relentlessly backpedaling he holds his attack forever creating some sort of stand off vortex.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dexxtaa on October 19, 2011, 06:12:31 pm
Never ever?

Amazing how a joke duel between a below average player and thorn with great long axes of all weapons can indicate to you his normal fighting style.

I'm impressed at your inability to have a give and take argument.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 06:13:06 pm
Shut up guys, you're just jealous.
Thorn is so good he can crushtrough on sideswings.

With an Axe!

My god, what a legend.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: cmp on October 19, 2011, 06:13:16 pm
When i was spectating the AUS server I saw Thorn couching with a sword.
Dismounted.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Keshian on October 19, 2011, 06:13:33 pm
I found a video of Thorn...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaeiFSfqEtQ&feature=related

I saw a guy using a great long axe to repeatedly stun-lock the other guys sword (that does not take skill, just a heavier weapon) in a duel, he didn't have 99% blocking rate in even a 1v1 closer to 85%, missed the guy in most of his kicks.  Better than average fighter but I could rattle off adozen EU and NA fighters that could consistently beat him ina  duel, especially with how often he misapplied his kicks and over backpedaled and over-held his swings (luckily against a non-aggressive opponent).  He probably could beat me, but like I said there are plenty of better EU/NA meleers than that.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 06:14:38 pm
Imagine a team of Daergar the noble prize winner and Thorn :shock: un-freaking-beatable!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 06:14:47 pm
Never ever?

Amazing how a joke duel between a below average player and thorn with great long axes of all weapons can indicate to you his normal fighting style.

Oh my bad, so when asking for video evidence of a damn good player, you post it... and then say "It is a joke duel does not count!" Thanks for that!

So mind posting a real video of this god incarnate? Or give me those AUS prime time hours?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 06:15:02 pm
When i was spectating the AUS server I saw Thorn couching with a sword.
Dismounted.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dexxtaa on October 19, 2011, 06:15:34 pm
I saw a guy using a great long axe to repeatedly stun-lock the other guys sword (that does not take skill, just a heavier weapon) in a duel, he didn't have 99% blocking rate in even a 1v1 closer to 85%, missed the guy in most of his kicks.  Better than average fighter but I could rattle off adozen EU and NA fighters that could consistently beat him ina  duel, especially with how often he misapplied his kicks and over backpedaled and over-held his swings (luckily against a non-aggressive opponent).  He probably could beat me, but like I said there are plenty of better EU/NA meleers than that.

He could beat Kesh over the head 20 times and that heirloom'd sonomy old friendun just won't die!

True story, I hit Kesh in the head twice with a MW Bec and he was still standing :(
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 06:16:08 pm
When i was spectating the AUS server I saw Thorn couching with a sword.
Dismounted.

Did he move? Or did he use the momentum of a spin thrust?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:19:14 pm
I saw a guy using a great long axe to repeatedly stun-lock the other guys sword (that does not take skill, just a heavier weapon) in a duel, he didn't have 99% blocking rate in even a 1v1 closer to 85%, missed the guy in most of his kicks.  Better than average fighter but I could rattle off adozen EU and NA fighters that could consistently beat him ina  duel, especially with how often he misapplied his kicks and over backpedaled and over-held his swings (luckily against a non-aggressive opponent).  He probably could beat me, but like I said there are plenty of better EU/NA meleers than that.


Overheld?

Stun, + if you notice that higher aggression with his sidestepping and holding would lead to him getting the first hit.

Secondly, this a video of a very very early tournament in 2010, shortly after beta's close, he was still learning back then.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dezilagel on October 19, 2011, 06:19:43 pm
Did he move? Or did he use the momentum of a spin thrust?

He commanded the world to move in his general direction.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Tears of Destiny on October 19, 2011, 06:19:57 pm

Overheld?

Stun

Secondly, this a video of a very very early tournament in 2010, shortly after beta's close, he was still learning back then.

Then why did you post it?
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 06:20:19 pm

Overheld?

Stun

Secondly, this a video of a very very early tournament in 2010, shortly after beta's close, he was still learning back then.

You have no idea do you, these people were doing these things back in beta
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 06:20:34 pm

Overheld?

Stun

Secondly, this a video of a very very early tournament in 2010, shortly after beta's close, he was still learning back then.

Hold your attack for too long and you loose damage bonus, imagine that, he would fail at something so basic.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:23:18 pm
Lose damage bonus for a weapon that 1 hits any way?

Doesn't matter, hit a bastard in the head and he drops.

Yes.

Ok, my two statements xant are seemingly contradictory, but the point is that the standard of play overall shortly after beta was naturally much lower due to the fact that the game had only been out for a couple of weeks.

Now, these two were at a higher standard of play back then than the rest of the pack, and continued to get better until January 2011, where they slowly stopped playing.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Dezilagel on October 19, 2011, 06:24:56 pm
Lose damage bonus for a weapon that 1 hits any way?

Doesn't matter, hit a bastard in the head and he drops.

Yes.

Ok, my two statements xant are seemingly contradictory, but the point is that the standard of play overall shortly after beta was naturally much lower due to the fact that the game had only been out for a couple of weeks.

Now, these two were at a higher standard of play back then than the rest of the pack, and continued to get better until January 2011, where the slowly stopped playing.

They didn't quit, they achieved apotheosis.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 06:26:56 pm
They stopped playing, as such you can without reprisal write what ever you want. Then when someone finds an old video you can dismiss it with "they were still learning". This is first class svada.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:30:47 pm
Ahh well, I am sure we can always wait for Warband 2 for them to get interested again, until then it's just a matter of:

Australians: Keen is better than any NA or Eu, honest, I've seen the videos

NA: Random NA player 1-5 is better than Keen and any EU, honest, I've seen the videos

EU: Random EU player is better than any Keen/NA, honest, I've seen the videos

That's all the EU v NA (with generally a few random Aus and maybe a couple other communuties) threads end up as.

I will be in London for a couple of weeks anyway in Feb, so I might make one night for some warbanding in some local EU servers, but I swear if I beat any of your top players, you lose all right to criticise the currently mystical to you Thorn/Toad :P
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Xant on October 19, 2011, 06:34:24 pm
i think you're the only one talking about how seeing videos makes you an expert
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Siiem on October 19, 2011, 06:36:50 pm
When M&B2 is released there shall be video evidence of their greatness from australia, and we shall ALL suffer the consequences. The prophecy has been foretold.

Siiem. 1:337 Book Thorn.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: yedrellow on October 19, 2011, 06:37:49 pm
When M&B2 is released there shall be video evidence of their greatness from australia, and we shall ALL suffer the consequences. The prophecy has been foretold.

Siiem. 1:337 Book Thorn.

Let it be known
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Cyber on October 19, 2011, 07:04:45 pm
Every successful fighting style in Aus was first perfected by them. They are the sorts of players to go up against 20 people single handedly with a one handed sword and no armour and win, consistently. No player has better performed group fighting than them.

I really don't really care about any of this Aus vs rest debate but you should realize that what you are posting there is completely ridiculous. Taking on 20 players with a 1h sword CONSISTENTLY with no armor is not a matter of your skill, even if you perfect your play to ultimate godlike levels, skill simply has nothing to do with it, it just can't be done. This can only happen if the opposing team makes huge mistakes and everybody is completely incompetent. Sure it sometimes might happen, I have few times managed to win situations like that and seen others do it, (not without any armor and just a 1h sword though :D) but even if it does, the reason is the mistakes made by other players and not so much the individual skill level. Dunno why i even responded to it though, i guess most ppl can realize that it's BS or maybe you are just trolling.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Casimir on October 19, 2011, 07:23:12 pm
all Australians are criminals, I trust them not!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: polkafranzi on October 19, 2011, 07:35:10 pm
Ned Kelly was Irish.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Casimir on October 19, 2011, 07:37:28 pm
All Irish are criminals as well!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 19, 2011, 07:47:27 pm
All Irish are criminals as well!

How about the Scottish? William Wallace gon tear down London you'll see!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: The_Angle on October 19, 2011, 07:52:29 pm
Boadicca destroyed London(Londinium) too.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: LordBerenger on October 19, 2011, 07:54:37 pm
Also poor Welsh peeps. They always get left out =/
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Osiris on October 19, 2011, 07:55:29 pm
Australian players cant be the best for a simple reason :D there are not enough of you ^^. One guy or One clan could indeed be very good and repeatedly rape everyone on the aus server. But thats your problem. with no one to test yourself against you wont improve :P The best players on EU and NA have a lot of other top quality guys to fight. They learn from each other push each other to improve and have a far greater variety of opponents and ganks  :shock:

As for the clans. we lets just say that EU has had some massive clan fights and many many tournaments where its clan vs clan (not sure about na im not na so cant comment on most of their shit outside strat)

There may be one very good clan with tactics in AUS maybe even 2 or 3 but NA and EU have many clans so they are pushed harder and see more tactics :P

Now stop trolling because GOD WILLS YOU DIRTY CRIMINALS TO SUCK AT CRICKET? Engerland!
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: [ptx] on October 19, 2011, 08:36:03 pm
I found a video of Thorn...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaeiFSfqEtQ&feature=related
Boring as hell.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Christo on October 19, 2011, 08:46:03 pm
Boring as hell.

Indeed. using that retarded native 2h mode on the GLA, no real exchange of blows or anything.

*yawn
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 19, 2011, 10:36:08 pm
Indeed. using that retarded native 2h mode on the GLA, no real exchange of blows or anything.

*yawn


*memories*

That's actually the weapon I was using to top the scoreboard on Native 22nd siege just before I joined cRPG x)

It had that berserker feeling  8-)


-Thread derailing since January 2011
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: SeQuel on October 20, 2011, 12:53:43 am
U dont know snatch? Hahaha.

Prepare for a trampling.

I know Snatch, I was joking since he left and came back.

Edit - Oppsy, forgot - I'm still the best archer in CRPG.
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Vibe on October 20, 2011, 08:14:04 am
I found a video of Thorn...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaeiFSfqEtQ&feature=related

Australia is full of cocky shits
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Uumdi on October 20, 2011, 08:44:14 am
Guys, guys, no matter what continent we live on... we all bleed </3
Title: Re: EU vs NA
Post by: Kafein on October 20, 2011, 08:46:03 am
Guys, guys, no matter what continent we live on... we all bleed </3


Like Neo ?