cRPG

cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Game Balance Discussion => Topic started by: Glyph on July 12, 2011, 09:36:34 am

Title: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 12, 2011, 09:36:34 am
why didn't they?!
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Patricia on July 12, 2011, 09:56:17 am
Because we don't want more of them.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 12, 2011, 09:59:50 am
i do, and a shitload of other people too, look at the horse burf topic, and a lot of others.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Patricia on July 12, 2011, 10:05:01 am
Learn to play without having to crutch.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 12, 2011, 01:24:38 pm
we worked it all out how it could be balanced, but no, not implemented
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: awesomeasaurus on July 13, 2011, 08:36:50 am
Will you please link that thread?
 I am interested in having cavalry balanced so the horses that don't see action much can be more viable.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 13, 2011, 08:44:16 am
Will you please link that thread?
 I am interested in having cavalry balanced so the horses that don't see action much can be more viable.
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,8301.0.html, http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,10073.msg146010.html#msg146010 and http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,8409.0.html. here you go
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Digglez on July 13, 2011, 11:40:14 am
Because we don't want more of them.

yes, thats the entire reason the other horses were nerfed, so that theres more horse variety

heavy horse prices need to come down 10-15%
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Vibe on July 13, 2011, 11:46:38 am
heavy horse prices need to come down 10-15%

Agree. Or atleast upkeep.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 13, 2011, 01:06:37 pm
Agree. Or atleast upkeep.
yep, the warhorse should be about 27k
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Soldier_of_God on July 13, 2011, 05:44:26 pm
that sounds about right, 15%. they raised the speed on warhorses, which is good, but now they are more expensive to repair than ever, let alone get ahold of. i think if we got this decrease i would be at peace with cavalry as a whole.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Torben on July 13, 2011, 05:50:28 pm
ya,  make the aromred horses cost more,  but have less upkeep
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 13, 2011, 08:43:16 pm
ya,  make the aromred horses cost more,  but have less upkeep
is that possible after the patch? before it wasn't
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on July 13, 2011, 08:44:30 pm
is that possible after the patch? before it wasn't

I think so. Right now for example items have a 7% upkeep cost but arrows are acting like 14%.

Or I am crazy :/
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 13, 2011, 08:47:21 pm
I think so. Right now for example items have a 7% upkeep cost but arrows are acting like 14%.

Or I am crazy :/
`that's true, but maybe it is set by equipment piece and not by armor
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: KaMiKaZe_JoE on July 13, 2011, 11:59:15 pm
The last thing we need is have (realistic) access to about half of the horses in cRPG. It would be ridiculous to assume that, in addition to fast, bundle of sticksy horses, we would also get access to their more manly, heavily armored, but slow counter parts.

When I speak of "access", I'm not implying that its imposssible to use the less-than-pussy horses. It is possible, but painful, given the lavish expenses and little reward.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 14, 2011, 12:05:33 am
and what i don't get is that if you would buy a courser, and equip a mail shirt on it, you'd have a warhorse, but the repairs would be much and much more higher. why is that? a warhorse isn't much more then a horse with mail.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Patricia on July 14, 2011, 12:55:20 am
Gotta pay for that shitload of mail required to dress up a courser.
Title: Re: why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?
Post by: Glyph on July 14, 2011, 08:36:15 am
Gotta pay for that shitload of mail required to dress up a courser.
ok, but if you do a mail shirt x2 it still wouldn't come close.

and a super fast/manuverable horse would also cost a shitload of money