why didn't they lower heavy horses prices?

[Glyph]

why didn't they?!

[Patricia]

Because we don't want more of them.

[Glyph]

i do, and a shitload of other people too, look at the horse burf topic, and a lot of others.

[Patricia]

Learn to play without having to crutch.

[Glyph]

we worked it all out how it could be balanced, but no, not implemented

[awesomeasaurus]

Will you please link that thread?
 I am interested in having cavalry balanced so the horses that don't see action much can be more viable.

[Glyph]

Will you please link that thread?
 I am interested in having cavalry balanced so the horses that don't see action much can be more viable.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,8301.0.html, http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,10073.msg146010.html#msg146010 and http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,8409.0.html. here you go

[Digglez]

Because we don't want more of them.

yes, thats the entire reason the other horses were nerfed, so that theres more horse variety

heavy horse prices need to come down 10-15%

[Vibe]

heavy horse prices need to come down 10-15%

Agree. Or atleast upkeep.

[Glyph]

Agree. Or atleast upkeep.

yep, the warhorse should be about 27k

[Soldier_of_God]

that sounds about right, 15%. they raised the speed on warhorses, which is good, but now they are more expensive to repair than ever, let alone get ahold of. i think if we got this decrease i would be at peace with cavalry as a whole.

[Torben]

ya,  make the aromred horses cost more,  but have less upkeep

[Glyph]

ya,  make the aromred horses cost more,  but have less upkeep

is that possible after the patch? before it wasn't

[Tears of Destiny]

is that possible after the patch? before it wasn't

I think so. Right now for example items have a 7% upkeep cost but arrows are acting like 14%.

Or I am crazy :/

[Glyph]

I think so. Right now for example items have a 7% upkeep cost but arrows are acting like 14%.

Or I am crazy :/

`that's true, but maybe it is set by equipment piece and not by armor