cRPG

Off Topic => General Off Topic => Topic started by: Torost on July 11, 2011, 03:15:21 am

Title: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Torost on July 11, 2011, 03:15:21 am
It is amazing if your into medievial armour,weapons,sieges and such.
(That i guess you are if you are playing warband)
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Thomek on July 13, 2011, 06:55:33 pm
Trailer here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-tpqF-zXuU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-tpqF-zXuU)

Awesome movie, looks like they have been playing warband in the research phase..

Basically, the whole film is one hopeless warband siege.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Dandelion on July 14, 2011, 01:44:29 am
Well, even if the whole scenario must be written on a post-it, even if the actors look like they were picked without interview in a suburb, this movie reminds me too much of the epic siege I fought in Tihr. So, first I'll rename it "Mount & Blade Warband: On The Walls of Tihr_AXX0_DVDRIP.avi", and then I'll watch it.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: bilwit on July 14, 2011, 02:27:31 am
Horrible, horrible movie. The fighting is pretty lulz though.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Siiem on July 14, 2011, 04:32:56 am
Anyone else spotted the Military cleaver xD
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Thomek on July 14, 2011, 02:42:01 pm
It is terribly predictable with terrible acting etc.. But the fighting is awesome.

Yep I saw the military cleaver!
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Gnjus on July 14, 2011, 02:49:25 pm
The guy with the cleaver has some awesome manual blocking skills (and he weights like 130kgs without any armor) while throwing is clearly OP. Point blank archery as well. 2 handed swords cut through overhead blocks ?  Arrows pass through shields ? :shock:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Logen on July 14, 2011, 05:13:53 pm
Actually the part where he charges and chops the man in two halves along with his weapon, then comes down and owns some more guys is one of the best in the whole movie.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Mtemtko on July 14, 2011, 11:40:02 pm
I like the part where people get slaughtered.
I'd love to see ability to chop limbs n shit in crpg.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Vibe on July 15, 2011, 09:49:45 am
Just might watch this :)
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Joxer on July 15, 2011, 07:17:21 pm
Shitty movie is shit. All the fucking cliches a fighting movie can have. Bunch of retarted lvl31 heroes fight 100's of lvl1 noobs. Even overly done fights wont save a stinking pile of shit. Watch Arn: The Knight Templar or something worth it.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Dandelion on July 16, 2011, 12:54:59 am
Just finished to watch the movie. To sum it up: nerf archery, buff cav, nerf two hands (crushtrough wtf?), nerf the bitch (she can kill danish veteran warriors ? SRSLY ?) and buff the squire: he needs like twenty swings to kill someone.

Otherwise, very predictable, actors play like shite, laughable plot and ludicrous direction, as expected. Moreover, this movie reminds me of Pitch Black: very often, characters do illogical things only for the scenario to progress. It's pretty pathetic. Nice fights, however. And that's why I watch it, actually.
 
Oh, and I saw this sword, which doesn't look very scandinavian to me, but I may be probably wrong; does someone know about it?

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Bobthehero on July 16, 2011, 12:58:10 am
No but I see double bitted axe and a sallet in the trailer.
Fucking anachronistic BS! And you cant cleave a man wearing armor in half and and and
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Gnjus on July 16, 2011, 01:22:28 am
(click to show/hide)

Is that Hodor's "willy" in the left edge of the pic ?  Or all Danes get that "excited" when they charge into battle ? :wink:
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Butan on July 16, 2011, 01:39:58 pm
And you cant cleave a man wearing armor in half and and and



Dont say that without even trying.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: RagnarLodbroke on July 18, 2011, 02:18:32 am
Is that Hodor's "willy" in the left edge of the pic ?  Or all Danes get that "excited" when they charge into battle ? :wink:

 All Danes get that exited! :D

on the other side it looks like a good film

EDIT: i just watched the film, its TERRIBLE, except from the fighting, the plot sucks really hard ! Also, why the hell didnt the templar close the gate after he woke up, instead he did get his horse and fails(HARD)
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Armpit_Sweat on July 19, 2011, 04:28:06 am
It is unhistorical, its unrealistic, its low budget. Danes seem to be speaking gibberish, not Danish.

Battles do look nice, as in gory, but poorly shot for the most part :(

Watchable if you are hungry for medieval theme, but was too predictable and unimaginative for me to enjoy.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


3/5, and only because i enjoyed James Purefoy and Brian Cox in other movies...
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Joxer on July 19, 2011, 06:25:09 am
Quote
    Errors in geography: The film shows Rochester Castle standing next to a bridge in a totally empty moorland landscape. In fact the castle was (and is) on the edge of the City of Rochester, which was already a thousand years old at the time of the siege, and right next to it is the great 11th-century cathedral of Rochester. On the other side of the bridge was (and is) the town of Strood, plus a number of smaller settlements.

    Anachronisms: King John's mercenaries are a band of "pagan Danes" several hundred years after the whole of Denmark was converted to Christianity.

    Anachronisms: The Templar hero has a 5-1/2 foot two-hand sword, something which didn't exist in the 13th century.

    Errors made by characters (possibly deliberate errors by the filmmakers): King John's mercenaries, the band of ''pagan Danes'' are actually talking in Hungarian, not Danish.

    Factual errors: In 1215, Rochester was already a sizable city. When Rochester castle is seen in the film, there is no sign of the dwellings that would have comprised the city, nor of the cathedral, which is a massive building, situated about one hundred yards from the castle. The cathedral was looted by King John's forces, during the siege.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Ozwan on July 19, 2011, 05:19:49 pm
Vladimir Kulich  :shock:

About errors list: it's rather pointless given the fact that even in first scene viking leader is carrying a o double-bladed, monstrous-size battle axe.  :lol:
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Joxer on July 19, 2011, 06:14:19 pm
What's wrong with that? Tappara is fun times :D
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Sultan Eren on July 22, 2011, 01:04:30 am
12vs1000 and 12 wins. Another stupid movie.

Watch Kingdom of Heaven instead.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Siiem on July 22, 2011, 10:19:03 am
Danes seem to be speaking gibberish, not Danish.

Like... perhaps, old norse?

Watch Kingdom of Heaven instead.

Which was an even dumber movie...
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Thomek on July 22, 2011, 02:28:21 pm
The cinema version of kingdom of heaven was terrible, but the longer directors cut actually makes sense. Epic film. See it again.
Title: Re: Ironclad - Great medival battle/siege movie
Post by: Dandelion on July 22, 2011, 03:22:32 pm
Like... perhaps, old norse?

Quote
Errors made by characters (possibly deliberate errors by the filmmakers): King John's mercenaries, the band of ''pagan Danes'' are actually talking in Hungarian, not Danish.