cRPG

Off Topic => General Off Topic => Topic started by: Asheram on December 21, 2016, 07:16:26 pm

Title: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on December 21, 2016, 07:16:26 pm
Well, looks like GiTS isn't going to be the only futuristic sci-fi in 2017

  :)
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Leshma on December 21, 2016, 08:06:37 pm
pls no
no more
these garbage sw and comic book hero movies were too much
don't spit on blade runner as well

Edit: This is so typical. Get some artsy pantsy cult director to give hope to people who value good movies, to lure them into cinemas. But take their creative freedom and dumb it down so your average Joe can enjoy it to the fullest.

Wanna bet on something? This movie will send a message how white man is at fault for everything wrong in this world. I can almost guarantee it. At least Japanese anime do not feature white males so I don't have to watch that crap every time I want to entertain myself.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: IR_Kuoin on December 21, 2016, 11:20:28 pm
Quote from: Leshma on December 21, 2016, 08:06:37 pm
At least Japanese anime do not feature white males so I don't have to watch that crap every time I want to entertain myself.

Almost every anime char. is a white dude. Cuz we're superior and the japs know it.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: LordBerenger on December 22, 2016, 04:20:00 am
I'll watch it. Not everything produced nowadays is shit and the world today isn't completely shit and we shouldn't all just commit seppuku LUL

That said, I doubt it's better than the original.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on December 22, 2016, 05:11:21 am
I think its a tie in.

p.s. there was alot of speculation as to whether Deckard was human or replicant so a sequel is long in coming...
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Torben on December 22, 2016, 09:38:13 am
Quote from: Leshma on December 21, 2016, 08:06:37 pm
Wanna bet on something? This movie will send a message how white man is at fault for everything wrong in this world.

you just gotta adjust your principles.  be a little more german and have an anschluss gene somewhere deep inside,  and every hero movie turns into a nihilistic drama.  Darth vader, magneto (although jüdisch. Ja, ja...),  Kahn.  All white males who just want to make for a better future.  Always beeing sabotaged by communist no-good women!

its heart breaking, really...
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: IR_Kuoin on December 22, 2016, 10:45:33 am
Personally if a movie has a female protagonist I won't watch that shit. They should also stay out of politics.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Leshma on December 22, 2016, 08:08:25 pm
Quote from: LordBerenger on December 22, 2016, 04:20:00 am
I'll watch it. Not everything produced nowadays is shit and the world today isn't completely shit and we shouldn't all just commit seppuku LUL

Not everything is shit, but can't remember when I watched American produced movie that wasn't shit? Maybe last year sometimes. It wasn't big production, that I'm sure of. Something like Coherence I really liked but that was three years ago.

Started watching Westworld with big expectations, was completely let down. Actually not completely, music is good and is always nice to see Ed Harris on big screen. He's kind of unsung hero imho.

This movie could be good, but if ends being good you can bet most folks won't like it. Because most people like stupid things like Disney Star Wars. Also they should find someone who doesn't have stupid face to be lead actor. I'm not saying he's terrible actor but Ryan Gosling has that frat boy look on his face which means I can't ever take him seriously in any role other than being dumbass char. Maybe he'll get better with age. You know who had extremely stupid look on his face that prevented him from playing anyone remotely intelligent but now as an older actor looks like someone who has bigger range of roles. Behold:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on December 22, 2016, 10:30:40 pm
Ryan Gosling might have a frat boy face but his acting in any role I have seen him in, even nice guys(which I found pretty funny) has been low keyed mellow like and mostly serious. Now if he was goofy as well like say for instance Ryan Reynolds visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 
I would understand your apprehension and might even agree with you about his being cast in the role. But, for me anyhow, I like his movies so I have no problem with it.

Also I thoroughly enjoyed WestWorld too, Anthony Hopkins and Ed Harris both were awesome. Sorry the world of the west let you down so much, the show and American movies.

Must be really hard to be so much more refined and better than the rest of us.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Jona on December 22, 2016, 11:55:35 pm
Quote from: Asheram on December 22, 2016, 10:30:40 pm
Must be really hard to be so much more refined and better than the rest of us.

Nah, he's just a weab.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: [ptx] on December 23, 2016, 12:59:16 am
Quote from: Leshma on December 22, 2016, 08:08:25 pm
-moping-
This is you:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on December 23, 2016, 01:34:44 am
I wonder how he will feel about this:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/blade-runner-2049-director-in-talks-for-possible-d/1100-6446465/
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Leshma on December 23, 2016, 05:06:27 am
Quote from: [ptx] on December 23, 2016, 12:59:16 am
This is you:
(click to show/hide)

Shouldn't you be working on some OK&M database or whatever you do for that open, half financed, half failed project?

Dunno why you guys even bother tbh, writing game code may seem lucrative in the short run but sooner or later your small fry studio will collapse. You know why? Because 90% of your customers are idiots. It's better to deal with someone who is capable of recognizing your efforts. They won't let you to rot after one 'bad' video game.

You think I'm being negative. Multiply me as many times you want, no way I'll deliver same amount of abuse you get from so called fans and investors. Especially braindead ones, who call themselves Goons.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Leshma on December 23, 2016, 05:11:37 am
Quote from: Asheram on December 23, 2016, 01:34:44 am
I wonder how he will feel about this:
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/blade-runner-2049-director-in-talks-for-possible-d/1100-6446465/

Good book but 'cult' movie was a failure. It's not like they are going to ruin its legacy by doing reboot.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Malaclypse on December 23, 2016, 11:40:09 pm
last good US (co) produced film I saw was The Witch (2015, but didn't see wide release until early 2016), personally.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Casul on December 24, 2016, 02:07:01 am
oKaM 2049
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: McKli_PL on January 12, 2017, 10:52:24 pm
Quote from: Cassi on December 24, 2016, 02:07:01 am
oKaM 2049
cygan 2144 :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on May 10, 2017, 02:16:22 am
Full length trailer.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Gravoth_iii on May 10, 2017, 06:03:58 am
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on May 10, 2017, 06:47:59 am
stoic
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: njames89 on May 10, 2017, 01:00:14 pm
Looks good. Definitely interested.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on October 08, 2017, 12:14:44 am
Loved it, the visuals and music were awesome. And in response to that Rich Evans video Gravoth posted, Ryan Gosling fit the character perfect
(click to show/hide)
Will definately be watching again.

Watch this before watching the movie, 3 back story shorts.

Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Beleg on October 09, 2017, 12:48:20 am
I've been waiting for this movie since the first rumours got out. Guess what; the distributor Warner bros decided it would be a good idea to censor the movie to attract more people in Turkey. It seems, any scene with nudity is edited. Sometimes don't you wish the world to burn? 
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on October 09, 2017, 01:07:13 am
Quote from: Beleg on October 09, 2017, 12:48:20 am
I've been waiting for this movie since the first rumours got out. Guess what; the distributor Warner bros decided it would be a good idea to censor the movie to attract more people in Turkey. It seems, any scene with nudity is edited. Sometimes don't you wish the world to burn?
Wow really? There was only a couple of scenes with nudity. You turks didn't get to see the giant naked Joi?
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Gravoth_iii on October 27, 2017, 12:24:41 am
I liked this movie. It wasnt amazing, but it was passable, it felt genuine and not like a studio popcorn movie.

However, watching the first blade runner just a week before, i really like that one. The aesthetic and soundtrack was incredibly good, and the new one completely missed the target on that feel. Intentionally i assume, but it was a pity. I like the neon lights, synth music aesthetic. 2049 had a very bassy BWaaaam soundtrack, didnt put me into that feel like the first one did.
Been listening to the old soundtrack at work a lot, very very good stuff.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Vexus on October 27, 2017, 02:00:14 pm
Its the first time I ever noticed how uneven ryan gosling's eyes are. Couldn't get my eyes off of it.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Prpavi on November 02, 2017, 04:05:39 pm
Visuals are great, I could watch people just walk around LA 2049, loved that they expanded that world and we got to see more of it (no gridlock tho? it's LA ffs).

That said the movie is 2.5 hrs long and I fell asleep  in the theater for the last 15 mins. Could  have been comfy 2 hrs and all good, but noooo we must have super slow boring sex scene that lasts more than the credentials and is more boring, one would think people get quicker in  the future, not in Blade Runner universe.

Now my beef with this one is again that Deckerd story. First film and it's many recuts were there to ask a question about individuality, AI etc etc,  I'm even fine with them playing around the fact is Deckerd a human or not, but they clearly set this up for more sequels, I'm gonna be immensely pissed if they gonna whore that idea to the very end and then in some shitty pretencious end scene crap on the whole franchise (Matrix anyone?) including the first movie.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Xant on November 02, 2017, 06:15:19 pm
Original Blade Runner is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Overrated in the same way as "modern art" or absurdist art like Picasso's shit are. People only like it because it shows how cultured you are and because it's hip.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Gravoth_iii on November 02, 2017, 06:28:28 pm
Quote from: Xant on November 02, 2017, 06:15:19 pm
Original Blade Runner is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Overrated in the same way as "modern art" or absurdist art like Picasso's shit are. People only like it because it shows how cultured you are and because it's hip.

Or people like it because they enjoy watching it? Ah who am i kidding, its all an elitist conjured opinion to make us look better than you peasant non-believers. Eat shyt bytch.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Leesin on November 02, 2017, 08:23:42 pm
Quote from: Xant on November 02, 2017, 06:15:19 pm
Original Blade Runner is one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Overrated in the same way as "modern art" or absurdist art like Picasso's shit are. People only like it because it shows how cultured you are and because it's hip.

I can understand why people don't like it, but personally I just do like it, not for any special hip reason, nor do I think it's art, I just really like the movie. Great setting, great atmosphere, brilliant scenes and sets, for a film made in 1982 it really stands up well even nowadays. It does have some of that 80s cheese but I think that's actually something I do like.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Xant on November 02, 2017, 10:51:19 pm
Pointless plot, nonsensical dialogue, completely unbelievable character motivations, prolonged "artsy" camera work that adds 90 minutes to the movie for no reason, logically inconsistent world, shitty action sequences.... what's there to like?
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Gravoth_iii on November 02, 2017, 11:05:53 pm
Great visuals, good music, atmosphere is very chill which fits the movies pace. The open idea of Deckard being a replicant or not staying unanswered and ties in with how the replicants are considered more human than the actual humans.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Xant on November 03, 2017, 12:33:20 am
Quote from: Gravoth_iii on November 02, 2017, 11:05:53 pm
Great visuals, good music, atmosphere is very chill which fits the movies pace. The open idea of Deckard being a replicant or not staying unanswered and ties in with how the replicants are considered more human than the actual humans.
Deckard being a replicant doesn't make any sense, and anyway it's possibly the lamest, easiest "wow look at our deep theme" cop out ever. "Haha what if we didn't specify whether he was human or replicant... not that it matters in the plot at all and in fact even WE don't know! But hey fuck it, replicants are so human that, woah, it's hard to tell them apart.... like... woah...."
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Gravoth_iii on November 03, 2017, 12:48:37 am
Quote from: Xant on November 03, 2017, 12:33:20 am
Deckard being a replicant doesn't make any sense, and anyway it's possibly the lamest, easiest "wow look at our deep theme" cop out ever. "Haha what if we didn't specify whether he was human or replicant... not that it matters in the plot at all and in fact even WE don't know! But hey fuck it, replicants are so human that, woah, it's hard to tell them apart.... like... woah...."

Its not that its deep, its that its lining up with the simple plotline to make for a bit more depth that isnt spelled out like movies traditionally do it. Deckard being a replicant definitely makes sense, and could go either way. Pretty sure Ridley Scott said thats whats implied, while the actors have said that its not so, and so its up to the viewer to interpret it. A movie that makes me consider some things, even if they arent holy shit deep, is still probably going to capture me more than one that spells it all out simply because it will make me more connected to it rather than just being the observer of something that is ultimately wrapped up.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Xant on November 03, 2017, 10:57:01 am
Why would Deckard be a replicant when he has none of the advantages of replicants? He gets wrecked by everyone he comes across, even the pleasure replicants push his shit in and he only survives because of luck each time.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on November 03, 2017, 02:51:18 pm
  I don't think Deckard is a replicant. In the original we were made to believe Rachel was "special" because she had no termination date where as all the other replicants did. There wasn't even a hint that she could give birth, I think that was just added to make the sequel work. Deckard doesn't even need to be one for it to work either unless they are trying to say "without saying" that both parents need to be replicants in order for the conception to work.
  And if he is a replicant without a termination date and the ability to make a child why would Tyrrell plant him in the cop shop instead of keeping him to work for him and paired him with Rachel when she was finished? Putting him in the cop shop would have put his unique creation at risk one would think.
If he is supposed to be one they could have done a pretty decent prequel telling how Tyrrell planted him in the police and also telling the back story of Roy Batty and crew back when all the actors were young enough to make it believable.
Title: Re: Blade Runner 2049
Post by: Asheram on January 09, 2018, 05:59:44 pm
Free on steam a virtual walk through of Deckards apartment from 1st movie
http://www.br9732.com/