all the cav suggestions that should be in the next patch

[Glyph]

Horses with tabards
Armored horses a lot cheaper
Long cav mace

Maybes:
1 time useable lances



If you have anything else(that makes sense) i'll add it

Also feel free to critcise

[LordRichrich]

sense not sence ;)

Sounds good to me imo, as a poor cav player I feel I'll never be able to use an armoured horse because they cost so much

[Skurcey]

sense not sence ;)

Sounds good to me imo, as a poor cav player I feel I'll never be able to use an armoured horse because they cost so much

the way you re supposed to do is play inf, earn money, than play cav. So half the team isnt cavalery

[LordRichrich]

the way you re supposed to do is play inf, earn money, than play cav. So half the team isnt cavalery

So every other class can play right off the bat but we can't?
In that case we deserve to be overpowered

[Felix]

We should make usual horses more expensive. Or just divide all horses into groups

- mundane horses (rouncey, palfrey, sumpter)
- speed horses (courser)
- maneuver horses (arabian horse, arabian warhorses)
- medium tier warhorses (from destier to large warhorse)
- high tier warhorses (up to mamluk)
- superbeast elephant

So we will need more horses for each group. Though i doubt it will be implemented.

[Dehitay]

As a footman, I have rage in my heart for you all and would like the implementation of a minor nerf that makes enemy hooves sound different from allied and audible from further away

[gazda]

i wouldnt change anything about cav , its balanced imo, only things remaing are more horses(by that i mean tabard horses) and a cavalry mace

[Glyph]

i wouldnt change anything about cav , its balanced imo, only things remaing are more horses(by that i mean tabard horses) and a cavalry mace

and getting armored horses cheaper, it wouldn't chang the balance of them really, because you can kill more with courser and arab, i just want to ride it, no matter how much i would such