Look I know crpg forums are a huge circle jerk and the fanboyism is stupid (in actual meaning) strong here that people are willing to look past any logic, but:
a) has he actually finished a game yet?
b) what makes you say he's good at managing?
I wish them luck because they're fighting a huge uphill battle given the studio's reputation in western world. If the game is finished, looks decent and interests me I'll give it a go as I would do with any game, however if we're to judge by past achievements it's not much to get excited about.
Unless that was sarcasm in which case you got me Leshman.
a) i've played one of his early games, some top down shooter he made with his brother so i'd say there is one finished game he produced lol
b) he's on the clear path to become derek smart level of being good at managing game studios (derek smart is the gold standard, his dev studio is over 20 years old and he never produced a quality game)
It's not sarcasm, I played wonderful games made by studios that last for less time than chadzs studio. I don't know how he does it, but he obviously found da wae to keep his company afloat.
Their studio reputation is mostly intact, less than 100k history nerds who bought the game on Steam are irrelevant among general population of gamers. On every gamer who knows what Of Kings and Men is, comes at least 500 who never heard of it.
It's not a circlejerk just an honest observation, have to give man props for being good at something. Have zero interest in their game, actually any video game at this point.
