Fortunately the Tanakh isn't followed by hundreds and hundreds of millions of fundamentalist Jews around the world. Not to say it isn't dangerous in the hands of some Jews in Israel or some Christians in the United States, just to mention the two largest concentrations.
btw. for anyone interested in these matters of religion in the modern world I can recommend The End of Faith, here in audiobook form.
You're intentionally distorting my statement and failing to reference my citations of polls conducted by Pew, Gallup, and Zogby. It does not matter to an equal extent that vile things might be found in the holy books of other religions from a utilitarian perspective at this exact moment in time. Why? Because polls and statistics concurrently show that much higher portions of Muslims PRESCRIBE TO the violent doctrines supported by their holy books.
If you go up to a Christian in the United States and ask them if they genuinely support the giving of daughters to their rapists, the stoning of adulterers, et cetera, you will have a significantly harder time than finding a Muslim in Saudi Arabia who genuinely supports the reprehensible doctrines of Islam such as the murdering of apostates or introduction of Sharia law. You can take the relativist and absolutist approach of arguing about why beliefs in the holy books of other religions can be or are dangerous but in doing so you are being disingenuous and willfully ignorant of the documented evidence suggesting that Muslims more readily and in greater numbers than any other major religion support the worst parts of their holy books.
EDIT: In short, Christianity and Judaism learned to morph into belief systems that can be compatible with the contemporary Western assessment of human rights--Islam has yet to accomplish this to a comparable extent, and to argue that it has is being daft in the face of overwhelming statistical evidence.
