Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Stronghold concern  (Read 4797 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MeevarTheMighty

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 242
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • http://www.afp.gov.au/what-we-do/
  • Faction: RDP
  • Game nicks: Genemeve et al
Re: Stronghold concern
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2014, 02:48:53 pm »
-1
Yeah, I'd call it a "plan".

Lack of detail isn't anachronistic, but a blueprint is literally an object invented six or seven hundred years after your game is set, so it doesn't really fit. You might as well call it a computer aided design.
Logged

Offline Bryggan

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 727
  • Infamy: 207
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: 13 Knights, HCE
  • Game nicks: Jerk, Asshole, Dumbass, etc.
Re: Stronghold concern
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2014, 04:31:49 pm »
0
I don't think anyone minds that we use modern English. Blueprint is a word we all know. No sense complicating things. Or perhaps we could only use old English, which everyone will have to learn in order to play.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]