Author Topic: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?  (Read 2212 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« on: September 01, 2014, 01:32:39 am »
0

The similarities are.. well yeah.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2014, 07:49:18 am by Christo »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Joseph Porta

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 234
  • cRPG Player
  • (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻. take all my upvotes! Part-time retard
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild Enthousiast,
  • Game nicks: Wy can't I upvote my own posts, Im a fucken genius, yo.
  • IRC nick: Joseph_Porta
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2014, 02:51:22 pm »
0
Esus, even the UI looks as if its copied straight from wot..
I loot corpses of their golden teeth.
But he'll be around somewhere between Heaven and The Devil, because neither of them will take him in, and he'll be farting loudly and singing a filthy song.

i'll be there at around
chadztime™

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2014, 06:37:12 pm »
+1
2.0? Doesn't look like an improvement, more like an alternative, really. Modern tanks, PvE and components, with what looks like reduced armor complexity and kind of even more arcadey tank handling and feel.

Even the visuals don't seem like an improvement, really. More vegetation on the maps, maybe
« Last Edit: September 01, 2014, 06:41:12 pm by [ptx] »

Offline Joseph Porta

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 234
  • cRPG Player
  • (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻. take all my upvotes! Part-time retard
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild Enthousiast,
  • Game nicks: Wy can't I upvote my own posts, Im a fucken genius, yo.
  • IRC nick: Joseph_Porta
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2014, 07:23:19 pm »
0
 WoW-ish damage text.. It looks silly.
I loot corpses of their golden teeth.
But he'll be around somewhere between Heaven and The Devil, because neither of them will take him in, and he'll be farting loudly and singing a filthy song.

i'll be there at around
chadztime™

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2015, 02:15:16 pm »
0

lol, look at the interface

even the messages have the same color as WoT, like when you destroy an enemy  :mrgreen:
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline Vibe

  • Vibrator
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2528
  • Infamy: 615
  • cRPG Player Madam White Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2015, 01:48:46 am »
0
I have an early access key for this. Post when you found out you were gay and you get it

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2015, 03:34:38 pm »
+1
When i met you, Vibe-san...

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2015, 07:09:50 pm »
0
So, first impressions - feels quite familiar to a WoT player, but more than different enough to not be a clone. Have had one good game (2nd highest on team) with my PT-76 starting vehicle, other than that been sucking hard :(

Not knowing maps and fighting against tanks 2 tiers higher is hard.

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2015, 09:17:46 pm »
0
Triple post, just to brag :)
My first game in T-62, my first "real" tank :D
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)

Offline Christo

  • Dramaturge
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: No faction, methinks.
  • Game nicks: Sir_Christo, Christo, Cristo.
  • IRC nick: Christo
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2015, 03:19:42 am »
0
I wonder if this game is going to be potato compatible at all

An open beta would be nice, too.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

                                                                                            Thanks to cmpxchg8b for the picture!

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2015, 09:59:52 am »
0
Runs smooth enough on Ultra on my gaming rig.

Offline Jacaroma

  • Game Admin (trial)
  • ****
  • Renown: 300
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
  • Cajun
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #11 on: November 03, 2015, 04:44:52 pm »
+1
Open Beta has started, I downloaded this last night. Feel free to add me. IGN: Jacaroma, just starting out so it would be cool to play with others.

Offline WarLord

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 354
  • Infamy: 30
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #12 on: November 03, 2015, 07:17:48 pm »
0
in  :)

Offline AntiBlitz

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 636
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player
  • American Scum
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #13 on: November 09, 2015, 08:21:28 am »
0
god damnit, i really want to like this game, but the 100 ping, west coast only server is fucking obnoxious and just outright retarded.  The hit trading, and constant spotting are also just silly.  I just cant understand the spotting mechanics, how am i spotted for like 2mins behind a hill that you cant see me from.  The ping tho, omg the ping, i cant stand it, the bane of me.  Impossible to dodge arty, delays you getting into cover after being spotted, hard as hell to hit close circling enemies with low velocity shells, the reticule lag, cant pull back from shots around corners, etc, etc.  Its so hard to play competitively with such high ping.

I get the game is different from WoT's, but im a fucking blueberry in that game, and it isnt all that much different, and yet i struggle so hard playing it. 

Then if you even mention it some cock bag from Australia chimes in the chat telling you to stop whining cuz his ping is higher, like i truly give a fuck, or better yet some Calimy old friend with 6 ping.  I just dont get why you would not cater to the 70% of players who play your game from the east coast.

Anyways, i made it to the Sheridan, and the grind became obscene, so good luck to anyone still playing. 

« Last Edit: November 09, 2015, 08:24:48 am by AntiBlitz »

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Armored Warfare: WoT 2.0?
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2015, 01:01:29 pm »
0
It's still open beta, though, right? Haven't gotten back to this since my grind-time is filled with WoWarships, might do so, once the beta ends.