0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What about making it 106 length (...)
Maybe it should make the big 107 reach?
Reach Damage (swing)Sword A: longer lessSword B: shorter higherWhy? Because +98% of hits on horseback are swings, so if this new sword has exactly the same reach but swing damage is lower, i would go ACS. I don't mind about rest of the stats (spd, mass etc.) but imo this is a big picture how to balance cav swords.
In teamspeak i like to hear all of your opinions on; beer and alcohol, chocolate chip cookies, social problems and their solutions, massmurderers, why ranged should burn in hell, hating on new maps, hating on old maps.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.
The length increase is not that huge, but the higher damage is very important.
I think length + swing damage is all that matter for a cav sword and if these where inferior people will still take the ACS.