Poll

what do you think ?

yes i think all relations would be nuetral
39 (32.8%)
no, old groups like UIF
54 (45.4%)
i do not care (im clanless)
26 (21.8%)

Total Members Voted: 119

Author Topic: Relations  (Read 4657 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: Relations
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2011, 06:06:55 pm »
0
E-Honor matters a lot, didn't you get the memo?
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline Machinist_HAHAHA

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Relations
« Reply #16 on: June 19, 2011, 03:20:51 pm »
0
everyone sizes everyone up so they can win, your a merc so you probably dont take it into account more then others do who want to build a empire but ye... its obvious people are gonna hold to old relations and grudges

Offline Reinhardt

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 274
  • Infamy: 84
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Crusaders of Acre
  • IRC nick: Reinhardt
Re: Relations
« Reply #17 on: June 19, 2011, 06:01:18 pm »
0
I'm sure several factions will hold grudges against each other, but only those with very weak strategical, tactical, and emotional minds will hunt an enemy at the start.
"A leader is a dealer in hope."

Offline Machinist_HAHAHA

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Relations
« Reply #18 on: June 19, 2011, 06:30:29 pm »
0
I'm sure several factions will hold grudges against each other, but only those with very weak strategical, tactical, and emotional minds will hunt an enemy at the start.

who cares if they do action is action, i personally hope any clan i end up in for strat has a part to play in your destruction as your known as some disloyal roleplayers who would shag a dead goat to get land

Offline Reinhardt

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 274
  • Infamy: 84
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Crusaders of Acre
  • IRC nick: Reinhardt
Re: Relations
« Reply #19 on: June 19, 2011, 07:57:27 pm »
0
who cares if they do action is action, i personally hope any clan i end up in for strat has a part to play in your destruction as your known as some disloyal roleplayers who would shag a dead goat to get land

lol. Lies can be easily turned into facts. Or at least to some...
"A leader is a dealer in hope."

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Relations
« Reply #20 on: June 19, 2011, 08:36:09 pm »
0
Relations will not be neutral.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,8628.msg127318.html#new

This alone is a good example.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: Relations
« Reply #21 on: June 19, 2011, 10:37:56 pm »
0
CRUSADE ON YOU FACE!
Turtles

Offline Electro

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
  • when death smiles at us all we can do is smileback
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: Electro
Re: Relations
« Reply #22 on: June 20, 2011, 09:56:29 pm »
0
CRUSADE ON YOU FACE!


and that turned out great didnt it casimir .....

after you hit 22nd and obliterated them The UIF came into play so techinically your to blame :L

growlz hit 22nd not casimir
« Last Edit: June 20, 2011, 10:21:59 pm by Electro »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline H4rdn3ssKill3r

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 107
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player
  • Crummy Wizard
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: naaaaaaaaaah
Re: Relations
« Reply #23 on: June 20, 2011, 10:00:16 pm »
0
Im pretty surreee it was growl :S
f8uasdlöadk blablablababa lbalba
^ Analogy of discussions on forums.

Offline Electro

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
  • when death smiles at us all we can do is smileback
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: Electro
Re: Relations
« Reply #24 on: June 20, 2011, 10:21:31 pm »
0
 owh yeah sorry Growl :L

i forgot his name so i blamed casimir ill change it sorry
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Casimir

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1756
  • Infamy: 271
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The Dashing Templar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Casimir
  • IRC nick: Casimir
Re: Relations
« Reply #25 on: June 20, 2011, 10:24:39 pm »
0
Yeah i was but a lowly Crusader back in those days, i cant really be blamed for that, Hell UIF or somethign like it would have formed eventually, Templar Block was too large it was always gunna make enemies.
Turtles

Offline Ecko

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 90
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Respect is earned.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: NA CRPG Admin
  • Game nicks: Ecko_ATS
Re: Relations
« Reply #26 on: June 20, 2011, 10:26:19 pm »
0
owh yeah sorry Growl :L

i forgot his name so i blamed casimir ill change it sorry

You must brush up on your strategus history sir:

From Casimir of the Templar Council
(click to show/hide)

From Echo, leader of ATS
(click to show/hide)

The Cavalieres' Strategus Endeavours
(click to show/hide)

Part 2 Strategus ATS History:
(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline 22nd_King_Plazek

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 87
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Relations
« Reply #27 on: June 20, 2011, 10:29:07 pm »
0
Foreign policy has a lot more to do with making enemies than size of an empire :P

Attacking a faction with powerful friends and some of the best fighters in the game was never a good idea, however small they seemed.


Offline Ecko

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 90
  • Infamy: 74
  • cRPG Player
  • Respect is earned.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: NA CRPG Admin
  • Game nicks: Ecko_ATS
Re: Relations
« Reply #28 on: June 20, 2011, 10:34:30 pm »
0
Foreign policy has a lot more to do with making enemies than size of an empire :P

Attacking a faction with powerful friends and some of the best fighters in the game was never a good idea, however small they seemed.

I believe their excuse was that you guys edited the database to add skill to your chars.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline 22nd_King_Plazek

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 87
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Relations
« Reply #29 on: June 20, 2011, 10:37:49 pm »
0
Yea Growl had some "moral high-ground" basis for the war. I think it was because when we won the assault of the siege of Durquba despite being outnumbered 3:1 some people on our team were using the same glitches everyone else used to win sieges. It was just that we did it better.

Also Growl and his Templar buddies were on the losing team  :P