Author Topic: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]  (Read 3004 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mofoka

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 24
  • Infamy: 6
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Z CREW
  • Game nicks: Killa / MacShoota
Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« on: March 03, 2014, 06:48:46 am »
0
Heavier, Slower, but way lower in damage.
Why is the best looking 2h sword in the game having the worst stats???

Its heavier and thicker, it should do like 46 cut and 24 pierce.
You could make it weight 4 like flamberge, and up the price!
Right now, its 3 length more than a claymore, and then all goes downhill after that. Less damage and speed for more weight.....(Well you get extra pierce but it's not worth)

Please write those stats on this thing and make my dream come true!
You know what they say:
People die when they are killed -

Offline Grumbs

  • طالبان
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1170
  • Infamy: 617
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2014, 11:46:42 am »
0
I'm not really too bothered about the model, but for the price the stats look OK. Its basically a Danish Great Sword for less than half the repair cost with -1 on both damage directions, -4 length, +1 speed and +1 weight (weight is usually a good stat for melee weapons for weapon stun, though atm weapon stun seems to be non-existent).
If you have ranged troubles use this:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Offline Tydeus

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1422
  • Infamy: 351
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Item re-unbalance guy
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Tydeus
  • IRC nick: Tydeus
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2014, 02:54:40 pm »
+2
Why is the best looking 2h sword in the game having the worst stats???
I was with you until this part, then I just couldn't take anything else seriously.

The weapon is bad only because people don't(know how to) utilize the extra weight to weapon stun.
chadz> i wouldnt mind seeing some penis on my character

Offline Angantyr

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1134
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2014, 03:06:40 pm »
0
atm weapon stun seems to be non-existent
Yes, weapon stun feels altered for a good while now, for the worse. Was wondering if it was just me.

Offline Soldier_of_God

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 159
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Sir_Tristan, Archerfaggotry, Sir_Edward
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2014, 05:31:01 pm »
0
The balance in general is sort of wonky. longswords doing almost as much damage as greatswords, flambard doing more damage, having more speed that much more expensive weapons at the end of the list... i really feel that 2h needs weapons rebalancing, though my main is a 1h. my alt character, sir tristan, is very enjoyable, (30/6), but i end up using the morningstar and heavy bastard instead of the greatswords, since they really arent worth it.

Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2014, 09:43:08 pm »
0
The balance in general is sort of wonky. longswords doing almost as much damage as greatswords, flambard doing more damage, having more speed that much more expensive weapons at the end of the list... i really feel that 2h needs weapons rebalancing, though my main is a 1h. my alt character, sir tristan, is very enjoyable, (30/6), but i end up using the morningstar and heavy bastard instead of the greatswords, since they really arent worth it.
(30/6)
-_-
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline Phew

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 775
  • Infamy: 132
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Phew_XVI
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2014, 04:48:31 pm »
+1
Everyone under-estimates the importance of weapon weight. Held attacks from a Heavy Great Swords will block stun Longswords/HBS/etc, and even very good players have trouble with block stun and how it screws up the rhythm of the fight. 
« Last Edit: March 25, 2014, 06:14:08 pm by Phew »

Offline Soldier_of_God

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 159
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Sir_Tristan, Archerfaggotry, Sir_Edward
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2014, 06:09:41 pm »
0
Everyone under-estimates the importance of weapon weight. Held attacks from a Heavy Great Swords will block stun Longswords/HBS/etc, and even very good players have trouble with block stun and how and screws up the rhythm of the fight.

while that is true, ultimately the most spammy wins in 2h duels.

Offline Glyph

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 143
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • Turbulence incoming
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: Horris
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2014, 09:37:51 am »
+1
It's even worse when you compare it to the Sword of War, the trade off is 2 speed for 1 thrust damage and .5 weight, in today's culture of longswords with 99 speed the loss in speed isn't compensated in the right way.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 
Glyph you have obsessive Horse Archer and Horse hatred.
- Official diagnosis :)

Offline Joseph Porta

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 234
  • cRPG Player
  • (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻. take all my upvotes! Part-time retard
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild Enthousiast,
  • Game nicks: Wy can't I upvote my own posts, Im a fucken genius, yo.
  • IRC nick: Joseph_Porta
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2014, 10:11:43 am »
+1
Have played with it for years, I think its OK.

Hold overheads :P
I loot corpses of their golden teeth.
But he'll be around somewhere between Heaven and The Devil, because neither of them will take him in, and he'll be farting loudly and singing a filthy song.

i'll be there at around
chadztime™

Offline Glyph

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 143
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • Turbulence incoming
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: Horris
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2014, 11:14:56 am »
0
Have played with it for years, I think its OK.

Hold overheads :P
Indeed it's OK, but why not make it just as good as other big ass 2handers?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 
Glyph you have obsessive Horse Archer and Horse hatred.
- Official diagnosis :)

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2014, 11:17:13 am »
-1
Because it's cheaper. It's also the best sword for stunning that has four attacking directions.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Joseph Porta

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 234
  • cRPG Player
  • (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻. take all my upvotes! Part-time retard
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild Enthousiast,
  • Game nicks: Wy can't I upvote my own posts, Im a fucken genius, yo.
  • IRC nick: Joseph_Porta
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2014, 12:11:07 pm »
0
The upkeep got alot higher a while back though.


Anyhow, this is a sword for cool aestethic people, not for the min maxers among us.
I loot corpses of their golden teeth.
But he'll be around somewhere between Heaven and The Devil, because neither of them will take him in, and he'll be farting loudly and singing a filthy song.

i'll be there at around
chadztime™

Offline Glyph

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 143
  • Infamy: 40
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
  • Turbulence incoming
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: Horris
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2014, 12:26:58 pm »
0
Because it's cheaper. It's also the best sword for stunning that has four attacking directions.
Do you really think money is still an issue for 70% of the community?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 
Glyph you have obsessive Horse Archer and Horse hatred.
- Official diagnosis :)

Offline //saxon

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1339
  • Infamy: 181
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
  • I'm just to dam goood 😎
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Saxon
Re: Heavy Great Sword [Why is it so bad???]
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2014, 02:54:06 pm »
0
atm weapon stun seems to be non-existent).

Yes, weapon stun feels altered for a good while now, for the worse. Was wondering if it was just me.

get on EU_3 with me, if i wanted to i can stun lock you on every attack 100% chance, you won't even be able to take one swing i know all the weapons that can do this.
Did it against gurnisson while i was half-swording my german greatsword every attack was a stunlock and i knew it was going to stun from the start, just stun after stun forcing you to block until the duel is over either by you quitting or dying. its easy, can do it all day. it needs changing imo, when i used the barmace a while ago i was just stunlocking on purpose because i knew i could, works with alot of other weapons too.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login