Author Topic: Strategus drama Penios  (Read 7864 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Sniger

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 795
  • Infamy: 442
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #30 on: February 21, 2014, 03:44:08 pm »
-1
either case Ands should have his time no matter what. who knows, maybe he would be lucky enuff to bump someone to death and take his weapon or something else, we dont know, because he was kicked by an admin BEFORE time was up. sure you could call DELAY if he was kiting you the entire round, but he didnt, he was kicked before time was up.

edit:
(-2 sumpter can't bump)

didnt knew

Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #31 on: February 21, 2014, 03:47:17 pm »
+9
Panos is a retard for not buying a single bow, crossbow, throwing weapon or horse. Even if he was stupid enough to don't do that, the guy who ran away for 14 minutes on a sumpter horse used an incredibly gay tactic that shouldn't be able to work.

Do the defenders have to kill every alive attacker if the timer runs out? If so, it's basically not possible to get a result with this ridiculous tactic, which is good, and any kind of delaying like this wouldn't happen again (I hope). If the attackers lose because of it, it would be incredibly silly and should be changed.
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Sniger

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 795
  • Infamy: 442
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #32 on: February 21, 2014, 03:50:47 pm »
0
but wait a minute  :lol: the weakest horse able to carry a man on its back can surely bump someone if they are naked or wear regular clothes?! i guess this belong to item balance forum

Offline Jacko

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 839
  • Infamy: 99
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Mappers Guild
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fffnanguard!
  • Game nicks: Jacko
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #33 on: February 21, 2014, 03:53:46 pm »
+3
We are discussing it in IRC at the moment. Should be a precedent set soon enough until we can get something more robust in place.
Monkeys!

Offline Sniger

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 795
  • Infamy: 442
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #34 on: February 21, 2014, 03:56:12 pm »
-2
in chess, what panos did is called "blunder"move  :lol:

Offline Rebelyell

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 398
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Knights Templar
  • Game nicks: Templar_Bobby
  • IRC nick: boobby
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2014, 03:59:31 pm »
+5
if time was not over no one should kinck anyone
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
You just killed me
Nerf you maybe?

Offline Miwiw

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 525
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: Miwiw
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2014, 04:06:05 pm »
0
How is it common sense to let a team win that's not prepared to do shit at all?
Miwiw_HRE - Two Handed
Trade with me

Offline sF_Guardian

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 738
  • Infamy: 254
  • cRPG Player
  • In honour of Pepe the kindest baguette
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Sad Hobo Guild, Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: Peso, Dondergod, Hobo_loves_Pepe, Ras_Putin_the_stronk, FrenchBow_le_tarlouze, Forrest_Trump...
  • IRC nick: Peso
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #37 on: February 21, 2014, 04:08:45 pm »
+3
There's a rule to prevent delaying, are you seriously complaining about this?
Besides that it's lameass shit anyway.
I don't want to give a feedback to molly neither i want to ban him,I wanted to give advise high authorities to take his admin rights.Panos you monkey wrench where would u put this topic enlighten me you cancer fuck.

Offline dreadnok

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 838
  • Infamy: 562
  • cRPG Player
  • fuck these jerkoff kids
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KBW<MB<SoW
  • Game nicks: Gorp_The_Gorger
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2014, 04:23:22 pm »
+1
100 troops will suicide after the fact that they could not catch a peasant on a horse constantly fleeing engangement. Sounds legit. Even if it's not breaking any rules it's gay as fuck and shouldn't be a possible way to win a battle.

Who the fucks fault is that? Why let it go on that long then ban after 13 minutes is an asshole admin
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Nessaj

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1399
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ▃ ▅ ▅ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇
    • View Profile
    • Vanguard
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Vanguard_Cooties
  • IRC nick: Nessaj
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2014, 04:23:46 pm »
+7
P r o j e c t i l e s

They're quite nice in combat, or at least that's what history tells us...

There was once this Roman fella' named Marcus Crassus, yep the one who took out Spartacus, he went on to invade Parthia. However his legions were defeated at Carrhae (modern Harran in Turkey) by a numerically inferior Parthian force. Crassus' legions were mainly infantry men and were not prepared for the type of swift, cavalry-and-arrow attack that the Parthian troops were particularly adept at. The Parthians would get within shooting range, rain a barrage of arrows down upon Crassus's troops, turn, fall back, and charge forth with another attack in the same vein. They were even able to shoot as well backwards as they could forwards, increasing the deadliness of their onslaught. Crassus refused his quaestor Gaius Cassius Longinus's plans to reconstitute the Roman battle line, and remained in the testudo formation thinking that the Parthians would eventually run out of arrows. BUT THEY DIDN'T. Good night everybody!
Things don't exist simply because you believe in them, thus sayeth the almighty creature in the sky!

Offline Ninja_Khorin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1067
  • Infamy: 90
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Zen
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan Ninja
  • Game nicks: Khorin/Keyoke/Lujan
  • IRC nick: Khorin
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #40 on: February 21, 2014, 04:26:26 pm »
+11
Shame the Nords lacked projectiles, then. Otherwise it would've been a clear win.

Here's my opinion:

Previously we have kicked defenders if they are not defending their flags or attacking the attackers if they've lost control of their castle or village. I've personally witnessed this happen, where the defenders try and hide simply to delay. Theoretically they can survive and win by time running out. They've always been kicked, even if the attackers had no means of catching them, because if defenders lose the flags, then they've failed at defending.

Same applies for field battles, except you're defending a caravan. This wasn't a horse archer I kicked.

In this case, the defender wasn't defending the objective or killing attackers, ergo he should lose whatever he was defending.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2014, 04:30:30 pm by Ninja_Khorin »

Offline Nessaj

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1399
  • Infamy: 176
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • ▃ ▅ ▅ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇ ▅ ▄ ▅ ▇
    • View Profile
    • Vanguard
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Vanguard_Cooties
  • IRC nick: Nessaj
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #41 on: February 21, 2014, 04:31:49 pm »
+1
Yeah, huge fail on the ARMY COMMANDER to not bring a cudgel at least. Shamefur.
Things don't exist simply because you believe in them, thus sayeth the almighty creature in the sky!

Offline Thovex

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 851
  • Infamy: 210
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguard
  • Game nicks: Thovex
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #42 on: February 21, 2014, 04:37:43 pm »
+1
lmaao
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Andswaru

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 554
  • Infamy: 130
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • SeaRaider_
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen of Fenada / SeaRaiders
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Andswaru
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #43 on: February 21, 2014, 04:50:07 pm »
0
imo, its the defenders job to survive a battle and the attackers jobs to win it. If this was 2000 vrs 2000 men we wouldnt even be discussing it. The attackers didnt bring the right tools and the defender would of survived.
 I dont give 2 flying monkeys about the trade goods or anything been undone, its mearly principle given that panos tried twice to get the defender ban kicked then after he was kicked was poll abuse he found a friend to come and kick the defender.
Smooth is the admin NA deserves. Not being that much better, EU deserves Thomek.
[18:25] <@chadz> soon(tm)

Offline Wiltzu

  • Sceptical
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 665
  • Infamy: 231
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kalmar Union
  • Game nicks: Kalmarin_Wiltzu
  • IRC nick: Wiltzu
Re: Strategus drama Penios
« Reply #44 on: February 21, 2014, 04:50:14 pm »
+30
The funny part here is this:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
When in Rome, live as the Romans do; when elsewhere, live as they live elsewhere.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Kaikki on tasa-arvoisia. Toiset on vain tasa-arvoisempia kuin toiset.