0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
Sure, everything is just an opinion, when you ignore the actual data...
I hate to love this game
You are a horrible human being clockwork.
When west germany annexed east germany, nobody moved a finger too.
why is this topic 9 pages long
A 2014 review described that studies done in animal models have shown fasting improves indicators of health—blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and inflammation—likely through adaptive cellular responses to better handle stress.According to a 2014 review of the scientific literature, intermittent fasting can cause weight loss of 3-8% over 3-24 weeks.[6]A study from the University of Ottawa found that on a low-calorie diet, there was no weight loss advantage to splitting calories among six meals rather than three.A second study found that switching from three daily meals to six did not boost calorie-burning or fat loss. In fact, the researchers concluded, eating six meals a day actually made people want to eat more.And a research review reached no conclusions about whether meal frequency helps or hurts with weight loss.This study was published in 2014 and compared eating breakfast vs skipping breakfast in 283 overweight and obese adults (1).After a 16-week study period, there was no difference in weight between groups.This study shows that it doesn’t make any difference for weight loss whether you eat or don’t eat breakfast, although there may be some individual variability.In fact, the evidence actually shows that short-term fasts increase metabolic rate.This is due to a drastic increase in blood levels of norepinephrine (noradrenaline), which tells the fat cells to break down body fat and stimulates metabolism (26, 27).Studies show that fasting for up to 48 hours can actually boost metabolism by 3.6-14% (27, 28). However, if you fast much longer than that, the effect can reverse and metabolism can go down compared to baseline (29).One study showed that fasting every other day for 22 days did not lead to a decrease in metabolic rate, but the participants lost 4% of their fat mass, which is impressive for a period as short as 3 weeks (30).
Oh, 2013. Back when the "eat 5-6 meals a day" broscience was the obvious accepted truth. Only one warrior of science dared to question it: Xant. He was ridiculed, for he was ahead of his time, just like Galileo.Back then, you had to search for the science and research to figure out it was wrong. These days, a simple Google search brings up a thousand sites talking about how fasting is beneficial and there's no scientific backing for the 5-6 meals a day thing.Some snippets from different sites:https://authoritynutrition.com/11-myths-fasting-and-meal-frequency/http://www.webmd.com/diet/obesity/features/6_meals_a_day#1https://www.jillianmichaels.com/blog/food-and-nutrition/myth-constant-grazing-boosts-your-metabolismhttp://muscleevo.net/six-small-meals-a-day/http://www.intense-workout.com/small_meals.htmlhttps://thepeopleschemist.com/stupid-diet-myth-2-eat-4-6-small-meals-per-day/And so on. Most link to studies.
lol wtf why is this topic getting posts nowim not actually fat
