Author Topic: [EU] Patoson  (Read 14817 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rico

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1021
  • Infamy: 158
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Rico, Mila
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #105 on: March 18, 2015, 07:03:05 am »
-1
I admit I have been AFK too long a few times, but mostly it was because I was tabbed out doing admin work, and, in most cases, I realised and "pseudo-kicked" myself by leaving the server / rejoining (you don't get the xp and gold if you leave before the end of the round).

If my memory fails me and I do it more often, I'll take a ban, if that's possible.

No favouritism in cRPGism!

Most of the time he is standing still we are discussing music or nutrition :wink: in the admin chat
Streaming cRPG, Supreme Commander and Age of Empires II on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/HeavenTV

Offline pepejul

  • Master-At-Arms
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1611
  • Infamy: 495
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen
  • PEPE INSIDE
    • View Profile
    • http://alkislarlayasiyorum.com/icerik/60166/pepee-pepee-cok-uzuluyor
  • Faction: Pecores / Krems / hobo in the heart forever
  • Game nicks: something with PEPE inside
  • IRC nick: Pepejul
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #106 on: March 18, 2015, 12:45:24 pm »
+1
PATOSON IS THE ONLY BEST BETTER AMAZING ACTIVE ADMIN  ON DTV ! LET HIM ALOOOONE !!!

BAN PEPE INSTEAD !!!
I LOVE YOU, ADMINS !

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Leshma

  • Kickstarter Addict
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2963
  • Infamy: 2449
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • VOTE 2024
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #107 on: March 18, 2015, 01:46:30 pm »
+1
Ban for mostly inactive player sounds like great idea. Why don't we ban Gnjus? Or Ujin? Hell, ban Paul, cmp and chadz. At this point even ban of great Banos seems like a great idea.

Offline JasonPastman

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 285
  • Infamy: 113
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Guys That CMP Has Quoted [GTCHQ]
  • Game nicks: Jason_The_Great
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #108 on: March 18, 2015, 11:55:52 pm »
+1
Watched this admin in action, very impressed!
If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure - James Madison
It is not wisdom but Authority that makes a law - Thomas Hobbes.
Too busy not giving a fuck...
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline El_Rey

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
EU Patoson
« Reply #109 on: March 20, 2015, 10:48:24 pm »
-4
This admin kicked for server twice for the dumbest reasons. First team is when at the end of the round my friend and I hit each other with our Xbows. He got offended somehow and said Stop teamwounding when it clearly didn't affect him in anyway. after that I typed in shhh and he kicked me. I rejoined shortly after and got back in the game and asked why he kicked me(Butthurt), he then replied shhh mocking me. So I let it go starting playing with my friend again THEN this guy with LINEN cloth started nudging people. Me and this other guy punched him back playfully and he died on my punch. guess what happened next the butthurt admin banned me from server. I would like this admin to be warned to not  get offended so easily over stupid things


Offline Linza

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: LINZA
Re: EU Patoson
« Reply #110 on: March 20, 2015, 10:52:11 pm »
+2
I was there, he said u u cant do that cause rules say it and u continued doing it... then u rejoined the server and continued doing that...
A[r]chers!

Offline Richyy

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 436
  • Infamy: 32
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
  • ยค=[]:::::>
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Richy_ / xDan / Rychi
  • IRC nick: Richy
Re: EU Patoson
« Reply #111 on: March 20, 2015, 10:57:13 pm »
+1
He doesnt get offended by this behavior, what he really care about is who breaking the rules and need to get a penatly for it, after all pato is the law  :P

Offline Patoson

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 784
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: EU Patoson
« Reply #112 on: March 20, 2015, 11:00:28 pm »
+2

pogosan

  • Guest
Re: EU Patoson
« Reply #113 on: March 21, 2015, 12:03:25 pm »
+2

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #114 on: May 07, 2015, 09:38:55 pm »
0
http://forum.melee.org/eu-(official)/ban-sgtpate/msg1135474/#msg1135474

Absurd. No one take care of defenders roster (2 different factions) so he was accepted by AI. You just denied the idea of being mercenary in strategus.

Recently we had a few fief transfers and each time Eques_Sebb apllied to defending side so we must manually change roster.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline Patoson

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 784
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #115 on: May 09, 2015, 04:39:33 pm »
+1
I've just fixed that. Thank you for the information, Kalp.

Offline Rando

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 593
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player
  • Chairman of the Refuge Against Domestic Violence.
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #116 on: May 15, 2015, 07:17:46 pm »
+1
I find it hilarious, yet concerning that an EU admin has muted me (an American) for calling him an "American Hamplanet".
I've never had a negative experience with Patoson before this, but it seems like he could use a reminder that his powers aren't to be used willy-nilly; and that hurt feelings don't mean you get to mute everyone who hurt them.
Nobody seemed surprised at this, is it really commonplace for things like this to happen in EU? If so, I suddenly have a much more heartfelt appreciation for our NA admins.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Women cannot be autistic, because that implies otherwise well functioning brain to be impaired in some way. We know that women posses no such thing.

Offline 722_

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 991
  • Infamy: 19
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #117 on: May 15, 2015, 07:26:00 pm »
+2
lol being an admin must be so shit
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Patoson

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 784
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #118 on: May 15, 2015, 07:28:09 pm »
0
I was trying to deal with an offence and I didn't want unnecessary spam in chat.

Offline Rando

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 593
  • Infamy: 183
  • cRPG Player
  • Chairman of the Refuge Against Domestic Violence.
    • View Profile
Re: [EU] Patoson
« Reply #119 on: May 15, 2015, 07:35:39 pm »
-6
I was trying to deal with an offence and I didn't want unnecessary spam in chat.

Oh, and somehow I was the only one muted? Your feelings were hurt and you retaliated by stripping me of my NUMBER ONE right as an American: Freedom of speech. In your attempts to defend America by banning those guys for their banner, you have only managed to slap our core values in the face.

This incident hasn't broken me. It's only reinforced my patriotism; and appreciation for the rights that you Euros still yearn for today.

Feel free to listen to the following video and reflect upon your actions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvZbq7AzQ3g
Women cannot be autistic, because that implies otherwise well functioning brain to be impaired in some way. We know that women posses no such thing.