But again, I misread your statement and corrected myself. The key difference that I see and you fail to notice is that Serbia caused NUMEROUS attrocities against Kosovo during the war, which is why NATO got involved. In case of Ukraine - the bullshit was cooked up by russia and then russia came to the rescue of the "oppressed russians"... which were never there in the first place.
About russian tanks and destroyed ghost convoys of armed vehicles, which were confirmed by Poroshenko and Rasmussen and so on, without any proof is a normal, nobody cares about it.
So for you 3500 dead civilians and tragedy in Odessa, some other dead people, closing all russian related Channels, a lot of deputies were bitten by radical people without any accusation is not a NUMEROUS attrocities? Kosovo wanted to seperate from Serbia, Serbia began ATO against Kosovo, NATO bombed Serbia, Kosovo is independent.
Maidan revolution with anti-russian slogans, Crimea didn't like and wanted to seperate, there were some threats from Right sector to bring an order in Crimea, Russia sends special forces, no dead people. Better. Why not the same on Donbass don't know. Same in Georgia, South Osetia wanted to be seperate, Saakashvili began ATO(I use this word to make parallels), Russia bombed Georgia. South Osetia is independent. But not accepted by USA/EU