So the observation was justified because Martin was black and black people break into houses? You are right, the observation wasn't against the law. It was still completly unjustified.
Must be the first time I hear anyone call observation "unjustified", like it's a no-knock search warrant or something.
And why exactly is his account more likely to be true?
Because of the eye witness account, the calls for help, Zimmerman's past behavior, Zimmerman's recounting of the event, Zimmerman's wounds, etc.
There was an eyewitness, but he only saw a small part of the incident. He neither saw how it started, who began to fight nor how Martin was shot.
No, but he saw Zimmerman in a very bad position taking a beating, and also describes the events that he saw exactly how Zimmerman told how it went.
Who said that Martin started the fight? That's Zimmerman's version. If somebody would chase me I would also confront him and ask for his reasons.
Zimmerman started shouting for help. Not usually the behavior of the aggressor.
Of course not, but 100% of his 50 (!) calls were about black males.
And this is 100% bullshit. It's 46 calls and no, not nearly all of them were about black males.. unless women of unidentified race are black males, pit bulls are black males, white men are black males, hispanic males are black males, loud music is black males, open garage doors are black males, etc etc etc.
Shooting unarmed teenagers is neither "handling shit" nor smart in my book. Especially since somebody had already called the police.
So you can't kill someone if you're unarmed?