Did you watch the video? The robber had a fucking gun, he pointed it in the other guy's face. The cop should have shot both of those fuckers. It's not about the bike at all.
The cop saw the gun and acted. If he had yelled "Freeze!" or something, who's to say he wouldn't just escape, or turn around and shoot the cop etc. It was within protocol, IMO.
One scumbag less, as I said.
Did the robber actually shoot? No.
Would a human being have been killed if the cop wouldn't have started shooting? No.
Those robbers were about to take off. So they did obviously not try to just kill anyone. Their main intention was to grab the bike and get the hell out of there - do you know why? Did the cop know why? Me neither.
Maybe they needed money for their families (Brazil aint that rich). Maybe the gun wasn't a real one after all.
So basically the cop had to choose between preventing a bike from being stolen and taking a (young) man's life.
Do you really think his decision was right?
Also, if i'm standing 2 metres away from my target, i dont need 2 body shots to take him out.
What about just shooting his leg, arm?
That was no preventive act - that's the pure cowboy-sherrif-IAMAHEROWITHAGUN attitude.
Cops are there to prevent ppl from being harmed not to murder them.
And if there are two ways to prevent harm (stolen bike, taken life) - is it really that hard to choose the right one?