End round dueling ?

[Clockworkkiller]

all i heard was

"blah,blah,blah,blah,my friends were doing something that might not be allowed blah blah blah, why do admins enforce rules, blah blah blah, why am i not a unique sunflower"

[matt2507]

When you decide to willingly break the rules and ruin everybody else's fun, shit get's serious, and I was hired to act, not to be a phantom admin just for looks and goodies.

Except that we not ruin the fun for anyone..

You want to be an active admin, which is good. But you should also know what to do at what time.

When you say that we ruin the fun for everyone, you really do not know what it is spent.
This therefore means you do bans without knowing what it is spent. I do not know what everyone thinks, but I find it really disturbing to a person supposed to administer the game..

Know to be flexible when necessary should be a prerequisite to be admin.

[Prpavi]

Except that we not ruin the fun for anyone..

You want to be an active admin, which is good. But you should also know what to do at what time.

When you say that we ruin the fun for everyone, you really do not know what it is spent.
This therefore means you do bans without knowing what it is spent. I do not know what everyone thinks, but I find it really disturbing to a person supposed to administer the game..

Know to be flexible when necessary should be a prerequisite to be admin.

What is it spent to be exact?

[matt2507]

What is it spent to be exact?

Precisely nothing..

They just made their duel and one of them is dead.
They did not bother anyone and the team won. I do not know what to imagine karasu on what is past, but there was nothing to punish apart fun if it is not allowed..

[Riddaren]

I'm suprised so many voted against this. Maybe the poll wasn't clear enough.

[vipere]

but when there are consistent complains in my steam chat in the exact moment and team speak (not to mention ingame) I can't let it slide.

There is players complaining about that ?!

They don't have enough fun playing the mod or what ?

[CrazyCracka420]

It's not about players complaining, or people being uptight stiff bastards. 

The points have been laid clear as to why this is detrimental to game play. 

If you can't use your imagination to figure those out on your own, and you can't be arsed to read the reasoning's laid forth, that's nobodies problem but your own. 

[Osiris]

I'm suprised so many voted against this. Maybe the poll wasn't clear enough.

thats the difference between eu1 and eu4. Eu1 people like to fight and win and generally stick by the rules when possible. Eu4 people like to mess around/troll/enforce their own set of rules (like forcing last man duels whats with that bs)

[CrazyCracka420]

Too bad I don't live in Europe or I'd thoroughly enjoy couching the last enemy alive as he tries to duel.  Even better if a teammate is unarmed and is trying to punch him to death and I end up team killing him on accident.  Oh no, don't ctrl+m me!

[pingpong]

In the case of OP giving  bans is way too harsh, when its the same 1 HA, or HX  delaying every round  against so superior numbers (more than 5 enemies) obviously the HA/HX should be banned.
Proper way to do this in the future would be to 1. Warn the players doing something the admin does not approve aka last warning 2. Kick  3. If it continues regardless, THEN ban

[Tears of Destiny]

But what if the HA/HX pulls it off, though? I've seen Rohypnol pull that off for example, seen Duke of Disco and a few others too... Then you run into the sticky mess of Admins giving arbitrary definitions of "I don't think you can pull it off so just give up now."

[Fartface]

Most HA can´t aim for shit and spend the last 4 minutes riding around keeping a massive distance and shooting in what they think are enemies , while realy these fuckers are just shooting into thin air the entire goddamn 4 minutes. Hell if an HA does rack up 12 kills as last alive id be more than happy to watch it because it´s entertaining and exciting , but they will just spend the 4 fucking minutes doing absolutely nothing.

[ARN_]

thats the difference between eu1 and eu4. Eu1 people like to fight and win and generally stick by the rules when possible. Eu4 people like to mess around/troll/enforce their own set of rules (like forcing last man duels whats with that bs)

Yea eu4 is more fun, that's why we want it back

[RobertOfDrugsley]

I'm suprised so many voted against this. Maybe the poll wasn't clear enough.

Yeah I didn't rightly know if the "problem" in the vote was the dueling or the admin intervention. Didn't stop me from voting though! Yay, democracy!

[Grumbs]

The best solution imo is to update the rules on how HA/HX's need to play when they are outnumbered at the end. They can legitimately waste everyone's time and still have no chance of winning and make people's gear break for no reason. ATM it falls under common sense/delaying for admins which leaves huge room for interpreting what to do. One admin might do one thing and one another, so not even ha's/hx's know what they should do. Most of the time there probably isnt even an admin to decide what do

There are solutions for updating the rules. Mine would be that you have to dismount if you didn't kill someone in the last 2 mins kinor so. There are other options too, thats just an idea.

The rule about tking needs to be enforced when possible though. Admins can use their judgement but the whole point of the strictness is to make sure people don't start thinking they can get away with it at all. Admins won't physically see probably 90% of teamkills but when they do they should probably make a point of punishing when its deliberate, even if its a duel. Its not up to players to decide when its ok to teamkill, and ive seen some crazy losses because people think they already won a round. It kind of sucks that it needs to be like that, since ive done it myself too, but its for the best I think. Most people cant judge 100% when their team have no chance to lose