Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: What if wpf increased chamberdamage?  (Read 1739 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Necrorave

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 609
  • Infamy: 71
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Who the fuck is this guy?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Dracul
  • Game nicks: Necrorave and or Cheesus Crust
  • IRC nick: Necrorave
Re: What if wpf increased chamberdamage?
« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2013, 07:51:06 pm »
0
Realistically (I know this is not the realism thread but its worth mentioning)  Chambering would slow down the process of swinging a weapon.  Thus making it weaker.

I am not against this idea being implemented in a small amount, although I would prefer not being one shot by a +3 bastard sword.
Logged

Offline FRANK_THE_TANK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1312
  • Infamy: 339
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • FluckCucker
    • View Profile
  • Faction: A Free and proud Peasant of Fisdnar!!!
  • Game nicks: FRANK_THE_TANK
  • IRC nick: Sippy sip
Re: What if wpf increased chamberdamage?
« Reply #16 on: April 12, 2013, 06:31:19 am »
0
Quote from: oprah_winfrey on April 10, 2013, 06:04:47 pm
You can chamber a chamber in any direction, doesn't have to be an overhead. (maybe not stabs as they stun up)

Yeah I never pulled it off with a stab I did the double duce with the others though but it's a pile of piss with the OH.
Logged
Fammi un pompino!

I think I have ball cancer in my right nut :(
Good news everybody! It's not nut cancer :)
Bad news everybody, I got dumped :(

Offline Rainbow

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 167
  • Infamy: 168
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: What if wpf increased chamberdamage?
« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2013, 05:45:03 pm »
0
Quote from: Gmnotutoo on April 08, 2013, 09:24:32 pm
Yeah, but I'd like to see it a little higher. Like 30, because as it stands agility is the most underpowered infantry class.

You can't really mean that...
Logged
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Pages: 1 [2]