Author Topic: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm  (Read 1603 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline owens

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 436
  • Infamy: 389
  • cRPG Player
  • PK_BALLA
    • View Profile
    • Our Website
  • Faction: Persian Kittens
  • Game nicks: PK's nice guy
  • IRC nick: PK world tour pm to donate
Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« on: March 21, 2013, 07:02:38 am »
0
Hoplite advantage

-block arrows
-block couched lances
-fighting multiple opponents
-reach +
-best turnspeed
-weapon is good 1v1 if you choose to drop the shield
-anti cav+

Piker advantage

-Cost
-foot speed
-build can be more dedicated
-reach++
-damage
-anti cav ++

Support

-Highest damage potential
-better feints and pauses
-fastest attack speed
-2 attack directions
-secondary 2 slot polearm potential eg high 1v1 potential


For me pike and long spear are falling further behind they are becoming more and more the poor or very cav frustrated mans choice. Of course I play in Australia where having at least some 1v1 potential is essential and pike is useless in such case. Keep in mind our best cav is dutchy who isnt exactly a warband athlete.

What are your opinions on longspear being one directional? It seems to me that if you plan on playing support to infantry a halberd or bill would do a better job and keep cav at bay. If you were simply after cav why not the pike. Of course bamboo spear and light lance really do throw this reach argument out.


Is there any real dedicated pikemen or do they all use a range of 1 and 2d polearms????
PK is back

PK is a collection of elites from throughout modern and ancient history. Giants of Calradia individually, as a group these gods of combat shatter all expectations and ascend to a higher plain of victory that only a few have seen before.

Offline Relit

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 574
  • Infamy: 109
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Relit
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2013, 07:09:25 am »
+3
Pikes are all about infantry support and area denial versus cav. I do not catch many cav unless they are unaware, but I do make them change directions or prevent them from coming into certain areas.

Some 2d weapons are decent infantry support but they usually involve you getting right up in the melee, with the Pike (and lesser extent long spear), you can use the reach to help multiple friendly infantry at once.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2013, 07:13:24 am »
+1
The Pike is actually pretty poor against cavalry in my experience; it doesn't do a lot of a damage, and the "reload" time after a stab is quite long compared to hoplite weapons or the Long Spear. It's good for snagging cav from a great distance for that initial rear, but not so great at finishing the job if the pikeman is alone due to it's slow speed. It can, however, work extremely well as infantry support; the ability to phase through your teammates and land a stab on enemies in front of them is pretty huge, and you can still bring a 1 slot sidearm (MW Q-staff is 24/24 for damage, fast, and long enough- a pretty good choice).

For pure support, I think the 2d polearms are at the top due to their malleability, though, with hoplites taking the next best (better in some instances like blocking fallen teammates from attacks, providing ranged cover). If Long Spear still had even it's weak overheads it'd be the top support weapon hands down.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Felix

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 89
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Deserters
  • Game nicks: Red_Pike/Oriental_Red
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2013, 07:26:13 am »
+2
Is there any real dedicated pikemen or do they all use a range of 1 and 2d polearms????

There are.

Actually u got pike's advantages a little bit wrong

-Cost
-foot speed this is irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with weapons, but more like athletics and agi
-build can be more dedicated there's no such thing as pikeman dedicated build - any polearm build is viable for piking, as there's no special skills for pikes/longspear
-reach++ well that's true enough
-damage absolutely not - long spear and particularly pike trade damage (and speed as well as for pikes) for reach. Long spear has 26 basic dmg and pike has 24 (which is very very low in comparison with 30+ for awlpikes, ashwood pikes etc). Your average hoplite deals much more damage
-anti cav + pikes and long spears are more like cavalry repeller, shorter but fast polearms are much more cavalry killer

If you aim for efficiency, you should choose hoplite build. They're tough, they have shields, ashwood pike packs a punch (mw version has 33 p dmg), they have reach and speed. When u get comfortable with 1 d attack only, u can actually take 2handers by surprise by pointblank thrusting.

Longspear is harder, but still nowhere near pike difficulty. Though it has 1 d attack only, it has pretty high damage, viable reach and that kinda annoying kick+pointblank thrust combination, when you kick the guy, point your spear above enemy's head and then thrust down.

Pike is really for dedicated players only, cause it's pain in ass to learn playing it. And most of times it's unrewarding experience. You do well until enemy decides not to pay any attention to you, but when they do, u gotta display some skill then. And due to pike extreme slow speed and overall sluggishness, it's not a surprise that you don't see dedicated pikemen a lot these days.

Offline Rhaelys

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 509
  • Infamy: 47
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: Rhaelys_BlockLeft_of_Chaos
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2013, 07:51:11 am »
+2
There are.

Actually u got pike's advantages a little bit wrong

If you aim for efficiency, you should choose hoplite build. They're tough, they have shields, ashwood pike packs a punch (mw version has 33 p dmg), they have reach and speed. When u get comfortable with 1 d attack only, u can actually take 2handers by surprise by pointblank thrusting.

Longspear is harder, but still nowhere near pike difficulty. Though it has 1 d attack only, it has pretty high damage, viable reach and that kinda annoying kick+pointblank thrust combination, when you kick the guy, point your spear above enemy's head and then thrust down.

Pike is really for dedicated players only, cause it's pain in ass to learn playing it. And most of times it's unrewarding experience. You do well until enemy decides not to pay any attention to you, but when they do, u gotta display some skill then. And due to pike extreme slow speed and overall sluggishness, it's not a surprise that you don't see dedicated pikemen a lot these days.

Longer weapons slow you down more. Thus, foot speed is a legitimate con.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Quote from: Uumdi
sweet of you guys to celebrate my birthday
wait you're talking about that devils lettuce arent you, god damnit
Quote from: Kreczor
yo you want to burn some sweet romaine tonight?
Quote from: Uumdi
yeah i smoke that dirty green shit fuck iceberg

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2013, 09:13:40 am »
+4
In my opinion the 2D polearms are not great. They are pretty bad in a 1 vs 1 as they are rather easy to block and they have rather little reach. The awlpike is probably the best one of these, but there is not that much tricks you can do with them. Which means that when you are alone people are just going to block you and when you are supported they don't hold a candle to the longer weapons. You always have to be in almost striking range of your opponent, you are able to usually only really threaten one opponent at the same time and so on.

The biggest advantages of the longspear/pike are reach. The importance of this for supporting cannot be overstated. This might not hold for Australia but on an 80 player battle server, more reach means that you have so much more targets that you suppress in your average clusterfuck. Which makes these weapons extremely good support weapons, as you can shit on ten players at the same time, by forcing them to continously pay attention and be passive because you could stab them at any time. As for low damage, I think the slower a weapon is, the more it benefits from speed bonus. Makes sense because the movement speed is relatively large compared to the slow weapon speed. I have often oneshot people in medium armour with a 7 ps longspear, because they were walking towards me and I stabbed them in the head. Similiarly I also take like 4 stabs sometimes to kill a running archer in cloth. Stabbing someone in the face who walks towards you with a pike hurts fucking bad, despite the low base damage. If you learn to work your speedbonus you can get a really high damage output with both the longspear and the pike.

Also the extreme ability of the longspear and especially the pike, to curve around and stab through teammates makes it a very potent surprise weapon. You are able to end ganks extremely quick. The longspear gives you basic 1 vs 1 ability, the pike gives you nearly none. You can in fact kickstab with a pike. I was able to do about equally good with these weapons, but pike requires a lot more attention to your teammates. The pike is in fact so long, that most people don't even realize you can attack them. Few use the pike though on EU, and even fewer use it succesfully.

I think the longspear and hoplite are rather similar. Ashwood pike is a little shorter, slightly faster and I think ashwood pike hoplite does just slightly less damage, but does have a shield. I have long been a longspear user and I always thought of switching to hoplite. They were equal in the past, but with the turn rate correction, dunno if you have that in Australia, the longspear turns slower and the ashwood pike turns faster. Which has swayed the balance towards hoplite for sure now. The higher turnspeed allows you to stab easier, surprise people by switching target at the last second. It also feels more enjoyable, less sluggish and restricted.

I don't know how much players we are speaking, but with the old turnrate, which means the same turn rate for every weapon. The longspear is the best weapon. I don't know how good you are, but if you learn to use this weapon correctly you can wreck some serious shit. If you even only stick with one teammate, you can already be a gamechanger. The key is battle awareness and learning to kickstab. Stabbing in general should be an up to down motion to minimize glancing. If you have the new turnrate, ashwood pike hoplite is the best. Due to more turning up and down stabbing is not necessary, but still the best way to do it. With lower player count I wouldn't use the pike. If you get in a 1 vs 1 you can kill someone quite easily with a longspear. With a pike it is incredibly difficult.

Offline WITCHCRAFT

  • Highborn
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2174
  • Infamy: 227
  • cRPG Player Madam Black Queen
  • get hexed
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: WITCHCRAFT, A_Hot_Elf_Princess, Yurnero_of_the_High_Plains, and secret alts
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2013, 09:13:53 am »
0
I've never enjoyed playing with a pike, although I've never tried a pike/longspear build. After realizing that the light lance is actually decent without a shield (as dehorsed lance cav) I fell in love with 2d polearms. The swiss halberd and english bill are AMAZING if you are supporting an allied melee player.

Against anything but an extremely competent cavalry player, you don't need the extra range of long spear or pike to rear a horse. Good pikemen are great at making supportive thrusts for their nearby allies, but I can't do that shit. I just prefer the massive damage (and highly likely 1 hit kill if you hit the head of your target) that 2d polearms have as an overhead. I haven't used the spetum/corseque/etc. but they seem more like a lance (mediocre but still damaging overhead).

Haven't playtested this at all, but with the 0 slot weapons change you have a lot more variety for backup weapons as both hoplite and pikeman. You can have a 2 slot shield with your hoplite spear and still have a 1h backup, or carry a 1 slot shield with pike. Or use a 1 slot weapon with a buckler (steel buckler and round steel buckler are DOPE ASS FASHION ACCESSORIES if you have a pike or longspear, they look cool as hell and you can have a nice 1h to swap to if you don't mind splitting wpf).
« Last Edit: March 21, 2013, 09:17:16 am by A_Hot_Elf_Princess »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


irl something shorted on the shuttle and laika overheated and died within a few hours of liftoff and for a brief while one could look up to the stars and see a light shooting across the sky that was actually a warm dog corpse slingshoting about the earth at thousands of miles per hour which was arguably humanity's greatest achievement so far

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2013, 09:17:20 am »
+1
The swiss halberd and english bill are AMAZING if you are supporting an allied melee player.
But the turning, oh god the turning. Same turn rate as the longspear, at least for the english bill, but then with lower reach, which means that people sidestep your overheads quite often.

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2013, 09:43:25 am »
0
Longspear/pike are definitely falling behind hoplites and other, shorter "support" polearms nowadays.

It feels like that hitdetection/sweetspot/whatever change for polearm thrusts, that initially came with the turnrate nerf has been reversed/changed, making landing hits reliably with these two weapons rather frustratingly difficult in many situations.

Offline Ronin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 859
  • Infamy: 198
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2013, 11:03:36 am »
0
Pikes and long spears are more useful for sieges. I got many kills with a pike in strategus fights that I could not have with spear+shield solely because of it's superior length.
Quote from: BlindGuy
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.

My UU key is broken incase you can't tell :D

Offline no_rules_just_play

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1401
  • Infamy: 384
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE; Peasants United; Burg Krems
  • Game nicks: CapraAegagrusHircus_HRE; no_rules_just_play_HRE
  • IRC nick: norulesjustplay
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2013, 11:06:04 am »
0
my rant was so strong that the forum moderators had to extinct the source of these revolutionary ideas by closing the thread:

http://forum.meleegaming.com/announcements/official-survey-about-item-power/msg746651/#msg746651
Quote
a personal rant, wich alot of people agree with:

hoplites and 2H are overpowered in comparison with pikes (1 or 2 directional polearms)
why? well, i think we all can agree that 2h is very good at facehug distance (aka duels). their swings are fast as fuck, the blocking feels very natural and they have instahits (stab and swing almost never glance). People tend to agree way less when we are talking about shields, but actually they are still pretty damn good in close combat: almost 360 degree magnet shield for autoblock AND instastabbing. yes hoplites can stab while facehugging maybe its harder vs 2handed players but... they also dont suffer a long glance when their stab gets blocked.

so conclusion: 2h and hoplite are very good at close combat. so what?

now we look at pikes (as i am piker i really felt this). We can all agree when a 2h attacks someone with a long spear/pike/long awlpike, he can easily win in a duel by facehugging and spamming. pikes are just slower and have very little directions to attack in. against hoplites, in facehug distance they will surely lose because the hoplite shield gives a huge glance when its hit and because the stabs are so instant.

ok, no problem. dont cry pikes, you suck at duels? so what? your long awlpike has 185 length, just outstab that guy with his pathetic longsword of 106 nab reach or that hoplite with warspear: 150 reach lol, poke at him from a distance. so easy. pike easymode.

WELL NO. this is fucking bullshit. a low length 2h easily outreaches my long awlpike. a warspear with a shield does the same. a ashwood pike does the same with a long spear. their stab has a huge bonus for some retarded reason and when a polearmer chambers his weapon, he stands there: bend forward like a retard his head open for all attacks while twohanders and hoplite just stand straight (wich is also weird because nobody would be able to hold balance like that).

so whats left for us pikes? we should be able to poke from a distance and suck in close combat. but at the moment we suck at both (oh yes, they still want us to suck more and they want the blocking to be removed, because the majority of twohanders  wants all the power for themselves.

btw: another thing, the turnspeed nerf. good addition in my opinion, but it sucks. and why? because it only looks at the weapon length on the site, while in fact the actual reach is way longer for the faster twohanders and hoplite weapons. we basically turn slower because our weapons is 'longer' but we dont feel it because we get outstabbed by the faster twohanders and hoplites.

its just gay...

Offline Byrdi

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 59
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Byrdi, Swiss Chocolate, and lots of other alts
  • IRC nick: Byrdi
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2013, 02:11:42 pm »
0
But the turning, oh god the turning. Same turn rate as the longspear, at least for the english bill, but then with lower reach, which means that people sidestep your overheads quite often.

The turn rate is not that bad at all. I am using the Swiss ATM and I hardly never miss the turn.

Also I think the Swiss Halberd and the English Bill are good because they are long enough to be used for ganking but also fast and heavy enough for dueling.
Especially the Swiss is good for dueling because it has 92 in speed rating, both of its direction are very good (damage wise), an overhead with the somewhat high weight can stun many weapons and the bonus against shield is good for shielders.


Offline Gurnisson

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1750
  • Infamy: 362
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Nordmen
  • Game nicks: SeaRaider_Gurnisson
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2013, 02:25:48 pm »
+1
The 300 length pike is absolute garbage nowadays. :cry:
I voted Gurnisson cause of his fucking bendy pike, I swear noone can roflcopter stab like he can.

Offline Pentecost

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 313
  • Infamy: 32
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2013, 06:16:21 pm »
0
I've been a hoplite for a while now (from 32-34+, basically), and I recently started picking up the long spear in hopes of getting better with it. My own opinion is that it's not so much that one is better than the other so much as it is that they're good at different things.

For me, spear + shield performs better than long spear on town maps, bridge maps, and others where your freedom of movement is comparatively restricted. It's also obviously better when there are tons of archers online and has the distinct benefit of being the only melee playstyle that actually has a decent chance of winning against a horse archer if you two are the last ones standing.

Long spear, on the other hand, definitely seems like it's better on open fields and any Strategus battle that isn't a castle siege. Like Teeth said, the reach on a long spear is invaluable. With good athletics and battle awareness, you can basically threaten everyone in a 60 degree cone in front of you and stay out of range of retaliation for almost the whole time unless your enemies also have long spears/pikes. This translates to more chances to attack compared to a hoplite and less difficulty in withdrawing from a push compared to a hoplite, who, even though he has a shield, usually has to come within range of multiple enemies to attack due to his weapon being shorter and slower.

Offline Penitent

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1389
  • Infamy: 220
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Penitent_Turtler
Re: Hoplite vs Piker vs support(overhead) polearm
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2013, 07:41:58 pm »
+1
For me pike and longspear are secondary/support weapons...like taking a crossbow or throwing axe as a backup.  If you are taking a pike or longspear, you better take a 1h as a melee weapon for when shit gets real.