Author Topic: The Great NA War -Losses To date-  (Read 59068 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Aldogalus

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 264
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Murder Boner, Keyboard Warriors (MB, KbW)
  • Game nicks: Aldo, Aldo_TheDandyDiddler_MB
  • IRC nick: Aldogalus
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #375 on: April 25, 2013, 03:42:29 pm »
+5
I sign for the underdog, and generally encourage my GUILDM8S to do the same. According to the words of FCC members, we don't even have a merc agreement, so obvi i have done nothing wrong. I have signed for FCC before, but its pretty rare that you need more assistance than the other team. This is the main reason that i sign for the other team, thought i do think you are a bunch of cocksuckers for the most part.

    ~Aldowild

Offline Aldogalus

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 264
  • Infamy: 64
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Murder Boner, Keyboard Warriors (MB, KbW)
  • Game nicks: Aldo, Aldo_TheDandyDiddler_MB
  • IRC nick: Aldogalus
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #376 on: April 25, 2013, 03:45:02 pm »
+2
bale doesnt play enough

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #377 on: April 25, 2013, 04:38:19 pm »
+1
At the risk of continuing to ruin the thread... am I that one rare fcc you like or just another cocksucker as you put it
Leader of BS

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #378 on: April 25, 2013, 04:43:16 pm »
+1
You act like cocksuckers are a bad thing...I cherish them.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Syls

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 168
  • Infamy: 15
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Kingdom of Veluca
  • Game nicks: Syls
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #379 on: April 27, 2013, 05:35:59 pm »
+1

Offline Hobb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 96
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #380 on: April 27, 2013, 08:34:48 pm »
+7
People have to merc en masse against for one reason: you're the biggest faction NA. You guys could, if you wanted (and I remember specifically a few battles early on where I was lucky to get in because you were actively trying to do this) fill your roster entirely with your own faction, even if only 1/3rd of your Strat members are actually active, seriously.

I know CHAOS can't do that or even half of that at most times, FIDLGB can't do that or even a quarter of that at ANY time, Teutonic can't do that, Hospitaller can't, FCC and Occitan might be able to do that (only at an extremely favorable time for either of them, really), and Fimbulvetr just barely could given absolutely perfect settings. I'm not saying this to call you a pooty or anything, also.

If your faction were broken into it's constituent parts on Strategus (The Kingdom of Veluca, Murder Boner, Hounds of Cthulu) as separate entities I know I'd be a lot more likely to apply for them in any given battle. Hell, I'm in a cRPG clan that has like, four of it's members in another separate Strategus clan (The Republic of Mates @ 9 members total). And those are people we could actually direly use to mount an offensive (we've had to settle for just giving them troops we couldn't use in exchange for gear).

Edit: typo!

Why would 3 seperate  factions that are allied, be any different than 3 allied clans in one faction? We would just be the "Evil Bloc," or the "UIF," or some lame group that anders thought of while he was taking a shit. We don't have allies not in the faction, we like every other clan lobby our mercs in a way that gets us mercs in our battles. As of right now, we get about 60 applicants a primetime battle, with a dozen or so of those being below 27.

And mala, you give me wet dreams at night, but this small clan v small clan utopia thingy you guys believe in is what ruins strategus. You guys rarely fight any battles, and yeah, its easy for your members to get the xp from all the battles because your mercs are damn good. But no clan not in our faction wants to hire DickSwag_Recruit_of_TKoV to a battle, because hes probably going to go 3-42.

It takes almost a minute to scroll down our battle results page, and we usually bring 5-10 big battles a week to all the members in our 3 clans, and the rest of the community, and have lots of fun doing it.

Without some sort of institutional overlord, physically making clans fight eachother in fair, even wars, their will never be a "fair" war in strategus. And at that point, its no longer something I personally want to play.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #381 on: April 27, 2013, 09:41:21 pm »
0
Oh word Hobb, I talked with Tristran about this some outside of this thread after realizing I was just shitting it up more.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Rhalzo

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 599
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FIDLGB
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #382 on: April 27, 2013, 10:22:39 pm »
+7
But no clan not in our faction wants to hire DickSwag_Recruit_of_TKoV to a battle, because hes probably going to go 3-42.

I'd probably hire him if he showed up in our TeamSpeak. Then I'd tell him he's doing a great job. By the way, you're all doing a great job.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Rhalzo's already in Chaos' cooler older brother clan, he's fine riding his motorcycle around in a leather jacket smoking cigarettes with GIRLS, our little treehouse isn't his speed anymore.

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #383 on: April 29, 2013, 01:30:46 am »
0
Since you guys was so nice and stopped being jerks in this thread you guys get a warscore update!

KDRs are the same(roughly) as last update. Green (now including the mates) has best KDR as a group with the Blue side being right behind them.

Enjoy!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #384 on: April 29, 2013, 01:54:15 am »
+1
Looks like four of the AoW vs Mates fights ended up under the FCC vs Green category; give them their own thing since FCC and Mates aren't at war.

Offline BaleOhay

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 789
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BS
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #385 on: April 29, 2013, 01:58:15 am »
+1
mates are more yellow than green on the map... and as Matey mentioned we are not at war with them. As long as anyone gets to pick how things are divided then AoW and mates is its own thing entirely.
Leader of BS

Offline Lt_Anders

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1049
  • Infamy: 651
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Man, I still play this shit?
    • View Profile
    • Drowtales
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Anders_Astralis
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #386 on: April 29, 2013, 03:05:19 am »
0
mates are more yellow than green on the map... and as Matey mentioned we are not at war with them. As long as anyone gets to pick how things are divided then AoW and mates is its own thing entirely.

We shall see....

The only thing that is thrown off is the global faction deaths and faction kdrs. Otherwise the stats don't matte what side they are one as the rest are all individual.

Also I added mates under green side at request of the mates themselves.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #387 on: April 29, 2013, 03:19:21 am »
0
keep em in the green block if they want, but FCC isn't at war with em so maybe you could do AoW vs Mates and FCC vs Chaos/FIDLGB separate.

Offline Jack1

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 231
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jack1_, Abbud_Amari, The_Doc, Gottlob_Kohlman
  • IRC nick: Risen_Jack
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #388 on: April 29, 2013, 03:21:24 am »
+2
Why not just make it....

X block kills:
X block deaths:

That would show how well each faction does without skewing the data.

Mabey add in seperate spoilers for specific conflicts.

Also: possibly a captured #... Starting from this point so you wouldent have to recount obv.
We're all nerds here, so it doesn't really matter.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: The Great NA War -Losses To date-
« Reply #389 on: April 30, 2013, 04:02:48 pm »
0
http://grammarist.com/spelling/bloc-block/

Quote
Bloc means a group of nations or people united by common interest. This is its primary definition, but it is occasionally used in a variety of other senses that make it roughly synonymous with group or alliance. The much broader block has a variety of definitions, but a group working together is not one of them.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy