[Global] Canary

[Tydeus]

koree is god, dont talk to her like that

Lemon, you don't get laid by white knighting women on the internet.

[Quinnie]

No, when I said that, I meant that there were multiple people doing what I did and yet I was the only one that was kicked - even in multiple rounds after I was kicked. And in those instances, those people were issued warnings.

It's cool, though. Canary's a self-proclaimed beer aficionado that likes to make an example out of me.

[EyeBeat]

Chris Hardwick was awesome in Singled Out.

[Combaticus]

Stop griefing our Weapon Racks Canary

[Damatacus_ATS]

Show me in the rules where it says we cannot have a weapons rack.

[Combaticus]

Show me in the rules where it says we cannot have a weapons rack.

BOOM! Checkmate!

[MURDERTRON]

BOOM! Checkmate!

After three days of writing and rewriting posts before finally replying, Canary will probably say you were delaying.  Well, I'm here to save him from this ordeal.  This all happened in the first minute of the round. So now, Canary will wait 4 more days before replying with a 6 page essay about how you were breaking the common sense rule all in an effort to cover up his griefing and causing his team to lose the round.

[Canary]

Exploiters.

[Damatacus_ATS]

It's not an exploit. It's plane and simply not against the rules, because there is nothing wrong with it. The only rule that was broken was when u chose to grief us by breaking our box. If you were any kind of just admin at all you would ban yourself for doing that. Also, if it had been a rule we were breaking coming up and breaking our box is not the way to handle that. You have admin chat for a reason. What you did was the same as killing a team mate because you had seen him team kill before that.

[Canary]

What you did was the same as killing a team mate because you had seen him team kill before that.

Not quite - killing someone and stopping them from playing the round at all is not the same as removing an object that allows people (an entire team) to exploit game mechanics, whether or not that keeps them from enjoying the round the way they were planning.

The only rule that was broken was when u chose to grief us by breaking our box. If you were any kind of just admin at all you would ban yourself for doing that. Also, if it had been a rule we were breaking coming up and breaking our box is not the way to handle that. You have admin chat for a reason.

This is partly true. It's my mistake that I didn't handle the situation with more tact; I should've explained my point before or instead of acting it out.

It's not an exploit. It's plane and simply not against the rules, because there is nothing wrong with it.

You are ill-informed. Weapon racks allow you to avoid upkeep on any items pulled out of them. Additionally, throwing weapons, for instance, were absolutely not balanced around the potential to restock them in endless quantities during a round. The only legitimate use for a construction site on battle or siege is as a barricade.

[Artyem]

NA_3 is the only server you should be using siege equipment on.

[Damatacus_ATS]

You are ill-informed. Weapon racks allow you to avoid upkeep on any items pulled out of them. Additionally, throwing weapons, for instance, were absolutely not balanced around the potential to restock them in endless quantities during a round. The only legitimate use for a construction site on battle or siege is as a barricade.

Saying I am ill-informed implies that this is a rule. We both know it is not in the server rules. Despite what your opinion is about this, you don't make the rules just because you are an admin.

[Canary]

You said it's not an exploit, but it is, in more ways than one.

The rules do say "no exploiting of any kind"

[Tydeus]

Despite what your opinion is about this, you don't make the rules just because you are an admin.

Actually, him being the head NA admin, he does actually have the authority to do this (within certain limitations.) Still, you don't really need Canary's ability of deciding proper interpretations/adding rules, to enforce the no constructable siege equipment thing.

[MURDERTRON]

http://forum.melee.org/na-(official)/ban-request-gheist_ritter/

Hey look at this shit lord responding within 5 minutes to white knight his teamspeak buddy and clan mate.  Please make it more obvious.

You said it's not an exploit, but it is, in more ways than one.

The rules do say "no exploiting of any kind"

I think Canary is mad because everytime a male character puts on a wedding dress, it reminds him that he'll never be a real woman.  And that is exploiting his self confidence.