What happened in Tosdhar.

[Gingerpussy]

FUCK THIS SHIT !!!
im quiting Strat and i hope all other ppl do same.

FUCK developers who NEVER fucking 1 time can post a REPLY!!!

GO play with cheaters andswaru ur pathetic PRICK !!! keep defending them

[Gingerpussy]

Leaving the faction to be to attack fiefs with inactive owners before the enemy gathers their wits and assaults them is obvious abuse.

YES !!! ban the fuckers or see a ALL OUT QUITTING of strategus.

[Osiris]

im doubting the all out qutting of strat but nice rage

[Noctivagant]

Ginger stop posting and talk to me about that look I'm back from emergency last night and I'm busy with that shit.
Don't stress me out

[Gingerpussy]

Ginger stop posting and talk to me about that look I'm back from emergency last night and I'm busy with that shit.
Don't stress me out

Fuck it Noc, im out of strat.

Selling Dhirim and play cRPG, atleast there we can have a fair game.

[Noctivagant]

Fuck it Noc, im out of strat.

Selling Dhirim and play cRPG, atleast there we can have a fair game.

You cannot sell Dhirim before I say something about it. Stop acting like loose cannon in general please

[Osiris]

so erm can someone explain what actually happend?

[Lt_Anders]

UIF faction had feifs that were on banned "multi' accounts. Therefore, UIF attacked those fiefs and did a flagcap so that they lost only 1 ticket and kept all gear, troops and otherwise, inside the affected fiefs.

NON UIF (IE mercs) are raging hard since it's a clear blatant abuse of mechanics to save the army and gear.(Says Mercs)

MY TAKE: Now, considering that GO, and co. could still sign people up for their battles(same with all the others) then they shouldn't have done this. It's not like the fiefs were undefended, so UIF should stop this bullshit and just leave their fiefs as is. If the enemy attacks, what is the difference between having the owner banned or not? Difference is the ability to take gear out after battles.

It's shitty, all around. I wish there was some form of punishment for it.
Just EU favoritism again. Don't ever bother doing shit to EU, but they get onto any kind of NA bullshit.

[Gingerpussy]

I am the one raging all day today. I am really pissed really really pissed.

prob amuse alot of people but that just prove them stupid, because all this is doing is destroying yet another v of Strategus.

So don't say the Mercs, say Ginger.

Blatant Abuse it what it is.

[autobus]

so erm can someone explain what actually happend?

Certain UIF members got accused of cheating and were banned prematurely to get things straight and make them explain the situation. Banned characters were booted from strat and fiefs owned by banned characters lost their owners so UIF factions had to attack their own fiefs to regain the ownership untill everything settles. Normally if you capture the fief, it loses all the troops and needs time to regain those but UIF is good at strat and they found out a way to get the things done without wasting a ticket from fief side, Shik already explained how.
In my opinion, the reason of gingers butthurt is because the Anti-UIF commenced this multiaccount check with their threats to leave the strat all at once and their true intention was to harm UIF, not to bring the fairplay onto the stage and seeing some fiefs staying unharmed (no cheating involved) he went full retard spitting out accusations and once again threatening devs with mass leaving the strat if they don't do what he wants.

[Segd]

flagcap vs noshow

Well in my battle there was some defenders
http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=1189

So it is exploit definitely
Ban Ban Ban

[Bjarky]

Certain UIF members got accused of cheating and were banned prematurely to get things straight and make them explain the situation.

Saying ppl where banned prematurely is an understatement, actually devs did check what was going on with these accounts and thought them to be valid enough to hand out bans, its now up to the banned to explain themselves to the devs.
You may ofc have your opinion and what other ppl might say, but the devs dont just ban for fun.
And no one can just tell them to ban without a traceable reason.

About the fiefs, its only against the rules if a attacking enemy army is closing in and an ally or the same clan then attacks its own fief in order to obstruct the enemy attacker and delay for a day or more, thats also what some clans have done in the past and gotten punished for.
If this doesn't apply then it's ofc no problem to make a transfer battle, we all have done it.

[autobus]

Saying ppl where banned prematurely is an understatement, actually devs did check what was going on with these accounts and thought them to be valid enough to hand out bans, its now up to the banned to explain themselves to the devs.
You may ofc have your opinion and what other ppl might say, but the devs dont just ban for fun.
And no one can just tell them to ban without a traceable reason.

Oh sorry for that misunderstanding i've never tried to say that they were banned because someone pointed fingers at them ofcourse you are right, what i tried to say that not all of those who got banned are guilty, some may appear to be an actual relatives or friends playing from one household and although i think that the percentage of not guilty players is low, we are yet to find out if there is any and who they are, calling player a cheater just because he got caught in this banwave is wrong.

[Crob28]

I believe that the frustration comes from the belief that banning the players who have multiaccounted is not enough.

By which I mean this, the factions that most of this thread talks about are perceived to have abused the multiaccount system on a clan-wide scale, meaning that it was not the actions of one or two players, but that the leadership knew and approved of, even planned, these practices.

This leads to the line of thinking that while banning accounts is of course a good thing, it also does not solve anything as the players banned have already shown that they are more than happy to simply get another one.

So the players banned will come back with new accounts, everything on strategus has been salvaged by their clans, which means that despite their cheating and being caught, they have in fact, lost nothing.

[Gingerpussy]

I believe that the frustration comes from the belief that banning the players who have multiaccounted is not enough.

By which I mean this, the factions that most of this thread talks about are perceived to have abused the multiaccount system on a clan-wide scale, meaning that it was not the actions of one or two players, but that the leadership knew and approved of, even planned, these practices.

This leads to the line of thinking that while banning accounts is of course a good thing, it also does not solve anything as the players banned have already shown that they are more than happy to simply get another one.

So the players banned will come back with new accounts, everything on strategus has been salvaged by their clans, which means that despite their cheating and being caught, they have in fact, lost nothing.

I need to hire you to do my posts nice written