Yeah like I told you before. FCC members are 100% opposed to the idea of messing up NA the way UIF did to EU strat. We refused to from an NA UIF with you and will always do so. We thought you had enough integrity to do the same and keep the game fun still on the NA side.
I never came to you with a UIF NA proposal. I asked if relations between Hospitaller and KUTT went downhill, if we would be able to come to terms about KUTT being a mutual enemy. That was it. I told you where we planned to stop our expansion if that happened. I also talked to other factions about lots of scenarios. That was just one of them.
I don't think alliances make the game "not fun". I think alliances that last not only for full versions of strat but into new versions of strat is not fun. That being said, there's nothing inherently "not fun" about two factions coming to terms with each other in ways that are mutually beneficial. This is a great way for each faction to become more powerful.
I don't see the doom and gloom behind it, and I think people just feel threatened. Let me throw this scenario out there (which won't happen). If KUTT and Hospitallers were powerful enough to take over the whole NA lands, we would certainly war each other at that point over territory. We wouldn't pull a UIF and just peacefully co-exist forever.