1. There is a large difference between having an intellectual discussion on situations such as protocol and conduct amongst officials and simply voicing subjective opinions based on personal preferences such as cultural arts.
2. You must not understand what ad hominem is considering that you're attempting to apply it to what I said. Let me give you some education on the phrase.
Ad hominem is essentially trying to discredit someone, belittle, or nullify the point they are trying to make by drawing a connection to a negative personal trait or past historical belief they might have that is often completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.
According to wikipedia:
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man"), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or unrelated belief of the person supporting it.[1] Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as a logical fallacy,[2][3][4] more precisely an informal fallacy and an irrelevance.Now considering that is definitely not what I did with anything said. This leaves me to believe you have no understanding of what the word actually means. To give an example of ad hominem:
While Spook Island defends himself against administrators who have a pension for abusing extremely gray and subjective areas of rules for their own desired benefit, despite being proven to be hypocritical and unbalanced in such methods of their utilization, he is attacked via ad hominem by a third-party spectator who hopes to stir up trouble and discredit what he is saying by accusing him of faking his own death; a belief completely irrelevant to the context of the discussion that also happens to be rooted in fiction as opposed to reality.This is an example of ad hominem.
Would you like me to go into further detail in case you aren't quite grasping the concept of it? I could always go grab more definitions of the word for you to look at.
On a related note, do you need me to also explain to you what a logical fallacy is or maybe even a strawman argument? I mean all it would take was a simple google search on your part, but I know some people still need to have things explained in a simple manner.
It's times like these I wonder if I should have listened to my undergrad marketing professor and become a college teacher like he insisted.
Don't worry, you don't need to thank me or tell me how smart I am. Your newly acquired education on this subject is reward enough for me.