Poll

Who won Strat 3?

UIF (Domintes EU lands and launched some raids vs NA for shits and giggles)
93 (38.4%)
Hosperglers and friends (Won the Steppes and conquered majority/all of the north (depending when strat ends))
42 (17.4%)
Nords (scraped out a kingdom in the sand, lost it, and then came back and took it again)
28 (11.6%)
TKoV (Actively at war for most of strat 3.0 and managed to survive (almost?) to the end.)
22 (9.1%)
Other
57 (23.6%)

Total Members Voted: 242

Author Topic: Who won strat 3?!  (Read 9978 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nebun

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 532
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • - BAD BECAUSE RUSSIAN -
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #105 on: August 18, 2012, 03:23:41 pm »
+1
So NA and EU both equally hate fighting on the other's ping, as we generally do quite a bit worse than we would with normal ping.

Get over it.

Its not about battle results, its about pleasure.
when UIF looks at you
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Braeden

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 420
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • I hear the sound of drums
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Acre?
  • Game nicks: Braeden_Sanguine
  • IRC nick: Braeden
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #106 on: August 18, 2012, 04:50:53 pm »
+1
I don't really mind fighting at 100 ping.

Offline Nebun

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 532
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • - BAD BECAUSE RUSSIAN -
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #107 on: August 18, 2012, 04:55:11 pm »
0
i got 150 ping on NA, but most russian players got from 200 to 300
when UIF looks at you
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline HardRice

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 740
  • Infamy: 161
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: 187/Alligator
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #108 on: August 18, 2012, 06:10:16 pm »
0
I don't really mind fighting at 100 ping.
100 ping is fine, 200 ping not so much.

Its not about battle results, its about pleasure.

Do your guys enjoy fighting with 200-300 ping?

Offline Mannhammer

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 117
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player
  • Only War is Eternal
    • View Profile
    • Forty Thousand Years In The Future
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #109 on: August 18, 2012, 06:21:56 pm »
+5
Other: BRD

Because they knew not to waste their time with it.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Cicero

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 515
  • Infamy: 418
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
  • scourge of god
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: BashiBazouks_Cicero
  • IRC nick: Cicero
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #110 on: August 18, 2012, 06:27:36 pm »
0
100 ping is fine, 200 ping not so much.

Do your guys enjoy fighting with 200-300 ping?
I totally hate it as a guy you said in a strategus battle

"cicero is really dangerous to both sides with NA ping"

Offline mandible/splinteryourjaw

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 50
  • Infamy: 12
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #111 on: August 27, 2012, 01:43:45 pm »
0
Free Peasants of Fisdnar won without a doubt.  Nobody comes close.  They did the most with the least and are probably the smallest land-owning clan (5 members when this started.)

They have repelled all attacks and own a seaboard city.  They are also the only clan to successfully raid deep into EU lands and return with their goodies.  They control some serious trade routes and oversee about 20% of the NA map.  As well as, set up two other clans with a home.

I don't want to hear any bs complaints about being a Hosp vassal.  The Free Peasants are free because of their own hard work and incredible think-tank.  Agreed that Hosp are great friends and supporters, but the Free Peasant's economy stood on its own negotiating skills and strategic planning.

Offline Teeth

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2550
  • Infamy: 1057
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #112 on: August 27, 2012, 03:22:00 pm »
0
Is there still a map somewhere where I can see who owns what?

Offline Nebun

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 532
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • - BAD BECAUSE RUSSIAN -
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #113 on: August 27, 2012, 04:34:29 pm »
0
Is there still a map somewhere where I can see who owns what?

nope, map is down for a while now
when UIF looks at you
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Tore

  • Item Manager
  • *
  • Renown: 882
  • Infamy: 329
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #114 on: August 27, 2012, 10:23:58 pm »
-1
ming won, no doubt

Offline Ninja_Khorin

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1067
  • Infamy: 90
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Zen
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Clan Ninja
  • Game nicks: Khorin/Keyoke/Lujan
  • IRC nick: Khorin
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #115 on: September 01, 2012, 01:56:48 am »
-2
Ninjas.

Offline Spanish

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 386
  • Infamy: 106
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 2h Cav Star of the year award winner.
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The official Drama Llama of Knights_Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: Hospitaller_Spaniard, BowPersona, Span
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #116 on: September 01, 2012, 02:58:33 am »
0
Where does one find strat and how do I win...
My horse is named pebbles and we like to try.

Offline Adoptagoat

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 237
  • Infamy: 25
  • cRPG Player
  • Know your Goat.
    • View Profile
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #117 on: September 02, 2012, 09:21:26 pm »
+1
The Hospis deserve a lot of credit for everything they have accomplished, but it couldn't have been done without the overwhelming support of the Templars.
At the same time, their opposition isn't defeated yet.  When faced with overwhelming (read: nigh-on infinite) gold, gear and (over time) troops, the only thing to do is retreat to a strong, defensible place.  We still have significant forces in a nearly unassailable castle.  (This by no means counts as "winning strat" for us, btw.)

UIF/DRZ carebears get what Sid Meier's series would call a diplomatic victory, they control too much of the game's population to be assailable.
Adoptagoat: http://i.imgur.com/p5s51.gif
Voso the Worst: thats you
Adoptagoat: I know.

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #118 on: September 07, 2012, 05:58:17 pm »
0
And it looks like with Planetside 2 beta being readily accessible now to anyone who gets a 1 month IGN subscription, Hospitallers have gone extinct in c-rpg and strategus.

6000 troops camped out next to Bulugha and we still haven't sent an army to attack...cmon now...I want some free xp
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1847
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Who won strat 3?!
« Reply #119 on: September 07, 2012, 09:33:38 pm »
+3
Other: BRD

Because they knew not to waste their time with it.

We have a winner.
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.