0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.
and that there might be more to a pink penis banner than first perceived.
As said also, with loose restrictions will no doubt come a few stupid banners, but why should anyone care really? It's the guy wearing the banner who makes a fool out of himself, and if you can't stand the eyesore then you can just edit it anyway. Give people the chance to play around a little and I think it'll ease up the tension and make way for some creativity and unpretentious fun (Heraldic armors make for great costumes with custom banners for example).
Modern "art"?
- no pictures which look "funny"
You fuck, or you get fucked.
In this, I see emptiness, sorrow and grief.It serves as a reminder to all just how empty and pointless life eventually is; the pointlessness and sheer stupidity of the artwork itself reminding us of our own place in the greater existence.What is the nature of God when HIS image creates such things as these?"God doesn't care about us" seems to be the statement made by this artwork; a frightening thought to man who consider himself superior to most, but when destitute engages in such pointless creation.After seeing this image, a symbol of life, but at it's most bleak, shallow and simple I grieve man and his fate of pointless existence. (click to show/hide)visitors can't see pics , please register or loginYep, I'd say that qualifies This is the kind of attitude I really don't get for example.
More than the banner, it's the face of the character that made me laugh.
MY EYES!I will never be able to believe how the internet revealed the total percentage of idiots within the human race, it's literally shocking!I will never ever understand why someone could choose to run around like a knight-samurai-Saracen. It would simply hurt my feelings of aesthetic and good look. No, not even "for the lulz", because dressing funny stopped being a good laugh at the age of... seven? Not enough that you already implemented that fucking Weaboo and Ninja crap, now you also allow banners in neon colours? Can't this be moderated somehow? Giving some rules concerning the icon and the colours? For example: - no screenshots/photographies (the horse in the picture, for example)- no items/things that didn't exist before 1600 (a car, a rifle, etc.)- no letters ("TGC" - tight gangstas crew) unless implemented in some kind of banderoles with Gothic font (e.g. "Deus lo vult")- no pictures which look "funny"- no ugly colour combinations. Usage of complementary colours is advised.- no picutres which do not look like made by a medieval artist and/or could not be embroidered onto a banner, excluding too soft colour gradients/shadowsThis should basically restrict all banners to nothing else than what should fit to the banners we have already ingame.Yes, I am quite intolerant in those matters. SAVE OUR EYES!
MY EYES!
Regardless of how underage or immature a person is, I still prefer them to the twats who sit on their high horse yelling "snark, everyone here is such a child, unlike me who: 1. Play the game for what it TRULY is, a medieval combat simulator. 2. Corrects your grammar as a means of arguing. 3. Wants more pikes and archers because battles simply shouldn't be won by individual players (I'm beyond that) but by 'teamwork' etc..."
Summary of this wall of text.''I'M A bundle of sticks WHO LOVES TO LARP!''
Joker makes a very good point.
Sense for aethetics =/= LARP.I don't have problems with a lot of un-LARP-y things in the game.
