Author Topic: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond  (Read 4069 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Renay

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 493
  • Infamy: 84
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Every Clan, but mostly Ninja!
  • Game nicks: Ninja_Renay
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2012, 07:04:42 pm »
Are you actually serious??? How is it fair if a single guy is left and keeps on riding away so he can not be killed?? They had absolutely no chance to reach him and none of them had any ranged. I think this should just be left alone now and nobody should be banned.
Blackbow is a bad admin,he once told me sandfriend It broked all my desire from the game/forums,i felt devastated,horrible don't know how to fix it.

Offline Tomas_of_Miles

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 263
  • Infamy: 37
  • cRPG Player
  • Inactive
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Rusty mercenary siege engineer
  • Game nicks: Something with Tomas in it
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2012, 07:06:09 pm »
Are you actually serious??? How is it fair if a single guy is left and keeps on riding away so he can not be killed?? They had absolutely no chance to reach him and none of them had any ranged. I think this should just be left alone now and nobody should be banned.

So they had no chance of winning against him? So they are delaying?
Professional poop cleaner

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2012, 04:17:14 pm »
If a horse archer or other ranged class is running away and shooting then he isn't delaying.
If people take cover so that he can't shoot anyone, he has to dismount and engage in melee. If they don't take cover, he can keep shooting and running until the round is over or everyone dies or he runs out of arrows.
This is the official stance, there is no other interpretation of the rules.

Nobody will be banned this time, but if people go on accusing ranged players of delaying while they really aren't, feel free to remind them that junk polls are a bannable offense because next time it will be enforced.

Offline dodnet

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 595
  • Infamy: 149
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Wolpertinger
  • Game nicks: DoD, DoD_Wolper
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2012, 12:14:27 pm »
If people take cover so that he can't shoot anyone, he has to dismount and engage in melee. If they don't take cover, he can keep shooting and running until the round is over or everyone dies or he runs out of arrows.
This is the official stance, there is no other interpretation of the rules.

HAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHHAAHAHHAHHHAAAAHHAHAHAHAHAA... next time I bring a shovel and try to dig a hole to hide in this open maps without cover.  :mrgreen:

There should be a rule like last HA/HX has 30 seconds to kill someone then he has to dismount. Its fucking boring watching this crap for minutes while dead/alive.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2012, 12:17:24 pm by dodnet »
The logic of war seems to be that if a belligerent can fight he will fight.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Torben

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2011
  • Infamy: 352
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • still prepare to get sexed
    • View Profile
  • Faction: by my overly nerfed heavy lance.
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2012, 12:21:11 pm »
nm, has been said already
Yes, I know from whence I came! Discontented as a flame, Upon myself I live and glow. All I grasp like lightning flashes, All I leave behind is ashes
Flame I am - that much I know!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Death_Dealer

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 36
  • Infamy: 10
  • cRPG Player
  • to Shish your enemies, see them Kebabed before you
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Shishkebab, Ronaldinho, Colossus, Death_Dealer, Brunhild, Whorecraft, Fahishe, Altair
  • IRC nick: Shishkebab
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #20 on: April 18, 2012, 04:25:13 pm »
Quote
i have been kicked from a server by an admin while i was horse xbowman pre gen i was the last against about 10 guys including ranged and cav players:P it was an open map i wasnt hiding, was always close to the enemy to avoid whine about running away and was attacking. there are no rules that say horse ranged as a last guy is forbidden but i thnk it was common sense f*** common sense.
i dont know how to quote this properly:S anyways this is a post of mine it was the frozen lake map i thnk not sure about its name.

Offline Sir_Ironlake

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 144
  • Infamy: 18
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2012, 05:29:11 pm »
Ill let this of with a WARNING,

delaying can piss people off and isn't allowed, but take care that avoiding the enemy is not allways delaying (such as most likely in this case).


---------------

thread remains open if anyone wants to discuss what is/isn't delaying.

Offline Ronin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 859
  • Infamy: 198
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2012, 03:23:09 pm »
Ok since the thread is open for the purpose of discussing, let me go for it, that I have something doesn't quite fit into my mind there.
If a horse archer or other ranged class is running away and shooting then he isn't delaying.
If people take cover so that he can't shoot anyone, he has to dismount and engage in melee. If they don't take cover, he can keep shooting and running until the round is over or everyone dies or he runs out of arrows.
This is the official stance, there is no other interpretation of the rules.
Isn't this rule a bit unfair? I'm not good with horse archery builds, but since archers have very limited skill points; which leaves them with most likely 0 PS and 1 WPF in melee. Also 0 athletics in that case, since it is a horse archer. How can a Horse Archer is expected to dismount and engage in melee? Shouldn't the both sides wait for the flag? And let's say the flag did not appear on map, well shouldn't it be more like the horse archer should fight with a melee weapon on horseback at least? In that case, the other side should stop hiding as well. So wouldn't itl be much more fair treatment that way? The current seems brutal in the horse archer's perspective.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2012, 03:25:11 pm by Ronin »
Quote from: BlindGuy
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.

My UU key is broken incase you can't tell :D

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2012, 04:51:30 am »
Ok since the thread is open for the purpose of discussing, let me go for it, that I have something doesn't quite fit into my mind there.Isn't this rule a bit unfair? I'm not good with horse archery builds, but since archers have very limited skill points; which leaves them with most likely 0 PS and 1 WPF in melee. Also 0 athletics in that case, since it is a horse archer. How can a Horse Archer is expected to dismount and engage in melee? Shouldn't the both sides wait for the flag? And let's say the flag did not appear on map, well shouldn't it be more like the horse archer should fight with a melee weapon on horseback at least? In that case, the other side should stop hiding as well. So wouldn't itl be much more fair treatment that way? The current seems brutal in the horse archer's perspective.

Unfair? Are you kidding?
The rule is fair to both horse archer and rest of the world because it allows the former to fight without being flagged as delayers, but at the same time it avoids stupid stalemate situations, like doing nothing for minutes waiting for the flag.
And yes, dismounting is not necessary when fighting with a melee weapon, but if people are behind cover most of the time it will be hard to reach them on a horse.

Offline Ronin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 859
  • Infamy: 198
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2012, 08:16:16 am »
Unfair? Are you kidding?
The rule is fair to both horse archer and rest of the world because it allows the former to fight without being flagged as delayers, but at the same time it avoids stupid stalemate situations, like doing nothing for minutes waiting for the flag.
And yes, dismounting is not necessary when fighting with a melee weapon, but if people are behind cover most of the time it will be hard to reach them on a horse.
Make it so that no one cowers behind a wall and horse archer can fight on horseback. Not that the horse archer is at adventage with that possibly short one slot one handed weapon on horse back, against his/her opponent with a possibly gigantic sized greatsword. I am surprised someone like you did not even come with much of an argument. Have you guys even know the word "fallacy" or pretend like a politician to use the mass ignorance to your adventage? Explain the reason why this is not fair. What you do is to explain why that rule does exist. Also the phrase you use at the beginning "unfair? are you kidding?" is an offending word; which supposedly boosts your statement's power up while decreasing my reputation. Or at least it is an attempt to to make mine bad, and bless yours. These are called "fallacy" in case you are not familiar with it.
« Last Edit: April 21, 2012, 08:22:29 am by Ronin »
Quote from: BlindGuy
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.

My UU key is broken incase you can't tell :D

Offline autobus

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 598
  • Infamy: 127
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bartering Brigade "Black Tea"
  • Game nicks: Autobus, Shushu, Samodur
  • IRC nick: Autobus
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #25 on: April 21, 2012, 11:37:04 am »
stupid monkey.

Offline Renay

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 493
  • Infamy: 84
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Every Clan, but mostly Ninja!
  • Game nicks: Ninja_Renay
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #26 on: April 21, 2012, 12:31:13 pm »
Make it so that no one cowers behind a wall and horse archer can fight on horseback.
So, you wanna add to the rules, that people are not allowed to take cover from a horse archer if he is the last one?
Blackbow is a bad admin,he once told me sandfriend It broked all my desire from the game/forums,i felt devastated,horrible don't know how to fix it.

Offline cmp

  • M:BG Developer
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 2052
  • Infamy: 569
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • IRC nick: cmp
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #27 on: April 21, 2012, 12:34:18 pm »
Make it so that no one cowers behind a wall and horse archer can fight on horseback. Not that the horse archer is at adventage with that possibly short one slot one handed weapon on horse back, against his/her opponent with a possibly gigantic sized greatsword. I am surprised someone like you did not even come with much of an argument. Have you guys even know the word "fallacy" or pretend like a politician to use the mass ignorance to your adventage? Explain the reason why this is not fair. What you do is to explain why that rule does exist. Also the phrase you use at the beginning "unfair? are you kidding?" is an offending word; which supposedly boosts your statement's power up while decreasing my reputation. Or at least it is an attempt to to make mine bad, and bless yours. These are called "fallacy" in case you are not familiar with it.

You got it all wrong, that statement is not supposed to boost my other's statement power, it's supposed to show my incredulity when I read your post. If you didn't know, before this rule, it was perfectly acceptable for an admin to warn/kick a horse archer for delaying, even if he still had arrows and the chance to fight.
I gave you the hand, you try to take the arm. Nope.

Offline a_bear_irl

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 540
  • Infamy: 252
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2012, 01:00:21 pm »
If people take cover so that he can't shoot anyone, he has to dismount and engage in melee. If they don't take cover, he can keep shooting and running until the round is over or everyone dies or he runs out of arrows.
This is the official stance, there is no other interpretation of the rules.


please make this rule known to all NA admins
FREE ALLERS

Offline Ronin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 859
  • Infamy: 198
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: BAN request for Bandit_Vagabond
« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2012, 03:04:05 pm »
You got it all wrong, that statement is not supposed to boost my other's statement power, it's supposed to show my incredulity when I read your post. If you didn't know, before this rule, it was perfectly acceptable for an admin to warn/kick a horse archer for delaying, even if he still had arrows and the chance to fight.
I gave you the hand, you try to take the arm. Nope.
Ok. Then this shows this was a revolutionary change. But hey! There's always better. When Thomas Moore wrote "the utopia" it was the most ideal utopia mankind have ever dreamed of. But now, it's flaws can be spotted very easily by everyone who has a bit of an idea about the subject.

So I'm offering an even more revolutionary (in my perception) idea. Since it is very unfair that a horse archer have to dismount and engage in melee while it has no melee stats, even lacking a good amount of athletics. While on the other hand, since the other guy can not fight back with a ranged weapon; this makes him a melee class which makes him far more superior in close combat.

Now, what I suggest is; make it so that, when the melee guy hides behind some walls and the horse archer guy can not shoot him. Let them wait for the flag first.
If the flag doesn't appear make it so that, Horse Archer has to use a melee weapon; from horseback (or dismounted if he/she wants). While the melee guy, should not be hiding anymore to make it possible the Horse Archer to use it's horse. This is, I think, is a much more fair treatment. Not saying it is the best, but I personally can not think anything better. Thereby, I suggest it.


And ok. That might be your style of writing. But that is what this statement does normally. Or is where it actually originated from. I see many people use the same style as well, so it is percieved as a natural behavior in here. However I would wish that people would stop using these. So it is actually you gave me the hand, I embraced it and gave my arm. You did not take it. Or I am highly schizophreniac. Or we think we are talking in the same language, but we don't in reality.
Quote from: BlindGuy
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.

My UU key is broken incase you can't tell :D