Author Topic: sneaky fucking russians  (Read 22704 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SeQuel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 446
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: SeQueL
  • IRC nick: SeQueL
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #180 on: March 13, 2012, 12:04:16 am »
+1
Wait, what?

I have NO idea.

In other news, you should probably stop talking Lemmy_Winks.

P.S - I like your name.

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #181 on: March 13, 2012, 12:13:12 am »
+5
To say there were 20 players in lljk and knights of new is a gross exaderation, lljk had over 100, and nights of new has like 70 now.

Tknights of new is a gross exaderation, lljk had over 100

exaderation

Exaderactly!
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline Kreczor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 332
  • Infamy: 204
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the qt crew
  • Game nicks: Kreczor_of_Chaos
  • IRC nick: Kreczor
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #182 on: March 13, 2012, 12:24:03 am »
0
I have NO idea.

In other news, you should probably stop talking Lemmy_Winks.

P.S - I like your name.
I like yours too! OHMYGAWDWESHOULDTOTALLYBEBFFS4LYFE
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Hobb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 96
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #183 on: March 13, 2012, 12:25:27 am »
0

And Hobb that whole dick and balls thing your talking about w/e applies to you and chaos too. Now your on the reciveing end of the dick and balls or however you put it and your mad about it? Again karma is a bitch.


Lol dick and balls thing


You should prob stop posting i dont want u to get trouble by your "officers"

Offline Lemmy_Winks

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 241
  • Infamy: 230
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Lemmy_Winks
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #184 on: March 13, 2012, 12:46:26 am »
-1
If my logic and arguments are so sound and impeccable that all you lot can do is attack my grammar and spelling, then i think my work here is done.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #185 on: March 13, 2012, 12:53:31 am »
0
If my logic and arguments are so sound and impeccable that all you lot can do is attack my grammar and spelling, then i think my work here is done.

We've become exasperated with trying to reason with you, Lemmy. No matter how many times someone puts forth a sound rebuttal or otherwise refutes a point you try to make, you ignore it and find something new to type about, go about on some new circular argument until there's a few posts you can ignore- there's literally nothing else for us to do against you but laugh.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #186 on: March 13, 2012, 12:54:34 am »
0
If my logic and arguments are so sound and impeccable that all you lot can do is attack my grammar and spelling, then i think my work here is done.

That is what we are all trying to tell you: your work here IS done.


(click to show/hide)
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline RibaldRon

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 144
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player
  • why do butts
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LLJK
  • Game nicks: LLJK_RibaldRon
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #187 on: March 13, 2012, 12:54:55 am »
0
If my logic and arguments are so sound and impeccable that all you lot can do is attack my grammar and spelling, then i think my work here is done.
Oh, you mean the logic and arguments that we repeatedly point out that even you constantly contradict in your own various statements and ramblings?  :rolleyes:

I guess you are bad at reading as well as writing.  But hey I guess we finally learned that we can get your attention by stooping to your level.  :mrgreen:
signature removed: annoying
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

USA USA USA

Offline Tyrell

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 126
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Cavalieres
  • Game nicks: Tyrell, Prince Aegon, Date_Masamune
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #188 on: March 13, 2012, 01:01:37 am »
0
No it wasnt the point i was bringing up about lljk, i said lljk and others, even a small clan like kutt collectivly provided several armies to Chaos even though they didnt have alot of players didnt matter cause theres plenty of Chaos to fight in the armies. I wish it would have been LLJK members who were fighting in the armies they were all bad except for Billgod and Lockt, smooth and bad where kind of good but only as cav they couldnt do much as infantry and have crappy strat battle performance ratings despite being on the winning team. To say there were 20 players in lljk and knights of new is a gross exaderation, lljk had over 100, and nights of new has like 70 now. Knights of new is growing fast and is  a relativly new faction, they have plenty of active players, ive seen lots of active lljk, 5 people could not have made and supported so many troops and so much equipment, and kutt has atelast 10 active members alone and they where the smallest and most insignificant part of your faction. Crusader allinace and wolves helped us some financially, but gave no real military support as all your allies did, which is what helps most. Ya crusader alliance sent one poorly equipped army at chaos but it dindt amount to anything.
We have 70 members?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

You are so terribly misinformed.
We have 20 at best, even less active in strat.
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

LIBERNATE

Offline MrShine

  • Ragdoll Basher
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1156
  • Infamy: 193
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Fear the stache
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: MrShine
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #189 on: March 13, 2012, 04:55:34 am »
0
a few things:

- HATE lost Vezin and Udiniad to TKoV about a week after burning ~1k troops to take both fiefs.  We then ended up being outnumbered 1850 to 1300 troops between the two battles.  So we both originally had similar troop totals but it was a matter of TKoV waiting for us to be hurt after the capture to take advantage of our weakness.  Still good fun and I don't blame TKoV for jumping in when they did, but not exactly even gear/troop ratios for those battles as was made to believe earlier.

- I'm pretty sure Lemmy Winks is trolling

- This thread started awesome but sucks now
Holy crap I have a youtube gaming channel! https://www.youtube.com/user/MrShine12345

Offline FRANK_THE_TANK

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1312
  • Infamy: 339
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • FluckCucker
    • View Profile
  • Faction: A Free and proud Peasant of Fisdnar!!!
  • Game nicks: FRANK_THE_TANK
  • IRC nick: Sippy sip
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #190 on: March 13, 2012, 05:51:55 am »
-2
The level of QQ is now unreadable. Its just a mash of insanity and madness.
Fammi un pompino!

I think I have ball cancer in my right nut :(
Good news everybody! It's not nut cancer :)
Bad news everybody, I got dumped :(

Offline Chestaclese

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 340
  • Infamy: 106
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Remnants
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #191 on: March 13, 2012, 06:20:01 am »
+2
I'm afraid I can't bring this thread back to life. The only thing left to do now is burn it to the fucking ground haha.
"Threatening Chesty with tea bagging is clearly not worth the effort. It is like offering sex addict an orgy." - BaleofGay.

"ILL OPEN MY GIFTS LATER MOM, IM BUSY FIGHTING CHESTACLES IN AN ONLINE HORSE SIMULATOR GAME." - Oprah Winafrey

“He's using everything he can to get me banned, admins please don't let him get away with this. He's ban baiting me, please help.” - Ducky_The_Banned

Offline BADPLAYERold

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 362
  • Infamy: 163
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: PRO
  • Game nicks: BADPLAYER
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #192 on: March 13, 2012, 08:27:11 am »
+1
I wish it would have been LLJK members who were fighting in the armies they were all bad except for Billgod and Lockt, smooth and bad where kind of good but only as cav they couldnt do much as infantry and have crappy strat battle performance ratings despite being on the winning team.

Whoa, say what you like about Strategus but i'm not gonna have a pubstar like you call me out for being bad.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


these are the last strat battles i have been in where i haven't been a 7/30 horse xbow build or on a team with no weapons getting spawn camped. (no horses in any of these battles fyi)


So yeah fuck you nerd.

Offline Ganner

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 553
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The other white meat
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Ganner_of_Chaos
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #193 on: March 13, 2012, 08:30:52 am »
0
Whoa, say what you like about Strategus but i'm not gonna have a pubstar like you call me out for being bad.

I would take bear, bad, and smooth over any 3 hosperglers any day.

Offline Scrambles720

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 25
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Astralis
  • Game nicks: Scrambles_Astralis
Re: sneaky fucking russians
« Reply #194 on: March 13, 2012, 08:55:34 am »
0
a few things:

- HATE lost Vezin and Udiniad to TKoV about a week after burning ~1k troops to take both fiefs.  We then ended up being outnumbered 1850 to 1300 troops between the two battles.  So we both originally had similar troop totals but it was a matter of TKoV waiting for us to be hurt after the capture to take advantage of our weakness.  Still good fun and I don't blame TKoV for jumping in when they did, but not exactly even gear/troop ratios for those battles as was made to believe earlier.

- I'm pretty sure Lemmy Winks is trolling

- This thread started awesome but sucks now

Shine your forgetting that right after we took vezin we were attack by a third party.(Fury_Blade_Azion_VIII)
literally wasting all of our troops and equipment we had left over from taking the village. For a clan who is so grateful to their overlords/masters(whatever you wanna call em.) "not kicking them while they were down" you sure as hell kicked us while we were down (then HoC became sellouts) ;) but hey, that's war.