How to: remove an admin

[Alex_C]

How about we can vote to perma-ban the people who start the threads?

[Balton]

This is like a test... to see who remains not yet muted after a couple of days...
SO MANY WARNINGS TO HAND OUT T_T

Honestly, I don't think I've ever had so much fun playing a game before. It's amazing how many people are too stupid to read rules before they post.

[Tristan]

I offer any admin under charge to help him with his Apologia Post.
I can review, write and give general critique.

[Balton]

I offer any admin under charge to help him with his Apologia Post.
I can review, write and give general critique.

Perhaps you don't get it, this isn't fun & games. Removal of administrative powers comes regardless of apologies.

[Tristan]

Perhaps you don't get it, this isn't fun & games. Removal of administrative powers comes regardless of apologies.

Because you are of inferior intellect you clearly do not know the difference between apologia and apology.

Not my problem! Try google it

[ManOfWar]

Because you are of inferior intellect you clearly do not know the difference between apologia and apology.

Not my problem! Try google it

Hmm thanks I just learned something, the more you know I suppose!
I had known of religious apologists but I did not know it stemmed from this

[Balton]

Because you are of inferior intellect you clearly do not know the difference between apologia and apology.

Not my problem! Try google it

D'awww, that's cute :3

[Professor]

Perhaps you don't get it, this isn't fun & games. Removal of administrative powers comes regardless of apologies.

Some sixteen year olds think they know everything!

[Joker86]

Oh my god, now there's two of those gay avatars (though one of them is edited  )! 

Every time I see one of Balton's avatars I have the feeling... that I would have... to take a shower. Just for having seen this. 

[Phazey]

So being admin is about being popular now? 

This doesnt work: we have trolls, even among the mercs, who just +1 for the fun of it.

[[ptx]]

I've handed out dozens of warnings already to people not abiding by the board rules... Seriously, READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING THERE.

[Bear]

yeah i will become troll admin than
but i promise to be good troll admin

[ManOfWar]

I've handed out dozens of warnings already to people not abiding by the board rules... Seriously, READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING THERE.

Ya i guess I was one of those people

[Garrus]

I have a question in my mind:
Is it ok, that admins can vote against other admins ?
Don't forget to take also into account, that if (hypothetically )
- I am in like Shogunate, I have enough member, to vote out an admin (its conspiracy theory I know)
- I make 15 registration, then I can vote out any admin.
So, the rules need some refinement.

My ideas, think about it:
A) There are a very few über admins (chadz, cmpxchg, etc.), who can insta-kick admins
B) There are reliable players, who are mostly independent from each other.
- To kick out an admin, the 15 player long hate-list have to contain at least 2 reliable players.
- When an admin is about to kick out, other admins have to answer this yes-no question:
  "Do the list have at least 2 reliable players?". We don't need a fix list of reliable players,
  admins can recognize them, and with this step we include some control into the process.
  Again: the question is not "Who are reliable players on this list?", but we ask only yes-no.
- If ~50% of admins accept the list, then über admins have the right to remove the admins.
- ofc., A) point can be used anytime during the process.

I think this little complexity is acceptable, because it wont happen in every week (hopefully)   

[Kafein]

I have a question in my mind:
Is it ok, that admins can vote against other admins ?
Don't forget to take also into account, that if (hypothetically )
- I am in like Shogunate, I have enough member, to vote out an admin (its conspiracy theory I know)
- I make 15 registration, then I can vote out any admin.
So, the rules need some refinement.

My ideas, think about it:
A) There are a very few über admins (chadz, cmpxchg, etc.), who can insta-kick admins
B) There are reliable players, who are mostly independent from each other.
- To kick out an admin, the 15 player long hate-list have to contain at least 2 reliable players.
- When an admin is about to kick out, other admins have to answer this yes-no question:
  "Do the list have at least 2 reliable players?". We don't need a fix list of reliable players,
  admins can recognize them, and with this step we include some control into the process.
  Again: the question is not "Who are reliable players on this list?", but we ask only yes-no.
- If ~50% of admins accept the list, then über admins have the right to remove the admins.
- ofc., A) point can be used anytime during the process.

I think this little complexity is acceptable, because it wont happen in every week (hopefully)   

There's only one weak spot in that system... Admins can support each other to never say there are reliable players. Maybe it's better if players vote for a limited number reliable players, that could fire admins in the same fashion as every player can currently.