The state of cRPG

[CrazyCracka420]

and wpf, weapon damage and power strike?

Sure why not.

Thanks for shitting on my great idea instead of revising it

[BlackMilk]

Actually I've had the same idea some months ago, but I cba to put it on forum

[Cris]

The only problem is with team balancing...when we get too much of something on one side (specially cav) its clean who wins.

I think after certain % of class per side, balancer should outweight the class difference over banners.

[Aseldo]

Yes we need to nerf ranged, lord knows they haven't been nerfed at least 100 times already. What's that? one nerf to 2 handers? All hell breaks loose

[Arrowblood]

Yes we need to nerf ranged, lord knows they haven't been nerfed at least 100 times already. What's that? one nerf to 2 handers? All hell breaks loose

[polkafranzi]

Yes we need to nerf ranged, lord knows they haven't been nerfed at least 100 times already. What's that? one nerf to 2 handers? All hell breaks loose

one nerf?

trololo, good one

[BlackMilk]

Atleast Ranged remained a viable choice..

[Casimir]

2h is more than viable. wtf are you taking about?

[MrShine]

Atleast Ranged remained a viable choice..

Yeah 2hand is such an un-viable choice that only a third of the community plays one.

[Xant]

Out of love, man. Out of love.

[BlackMilk]

When did I say that 2h isnt viable? I just stated that ranged is still viable

[Kafein]

The only problem is with team balancing...when we get too much of something on one side (specially cav) its clean who wins.

I think after certain % of class per side, balancer should outweight the class difference over banners.

Admitting there is a problem when teams aren't class-balanced is admitting there is a problem with the classes. Mass cav teams win often when the map isn't a village, mountain from another planet or town (read : on less than 20% of the maps, mass cav will probably win, although the chances are still fairly high for the usual village maps). But mass ranged wins much more often, as the natural advantages due to difficult terrain are always in favor of range.


A full-inf team should have the same chances as a full-cav or full-ranged team (given a neutral map and a few rounds to adapt of course). If it doesn't, then the classes aren't balanced.

[Frankysan]

 

Yeah 2hand is such an un-viable choice that only a third of the community plays one.

the next guy crying about 2h nerf should really win some big award lol, 0.1 on ready animation and you talk about not being viable?
a longsword with 0 wpf and 24 agi  is still viable to spam ppl face 

[Lorenzo_of_Iberia]

The only problem is with team balancing...when we get too much of something on one side (specially cav) its clean who wins.

I think after certain % of class per side, balancer should outweight the class difference over banners.

This is only true if a team hasnt got the sense to change their style in response to the inbanlance. The problem is that there is such a lack of shields and anti-cav polearms that if one side has plenty of ranged or cav they are unstoppable because no team has enough shields or spears to stop them steamrolling.

[Dezilagel]

the next guy crying about 2h nerf should really win some big award lol, 0.1 on ready animation and you talk about not being viable?
a longsword with 0 wpf and 24 agi  is still viable to spam ppl face 

The problem with the nerf isn't the 2h/pole balance vs other classes, but rather that it fucks up the melee game by:

1. Making it slow(er) and boring

2. Promoting spam