You want to tell us that making it easier to kill someone with a lance (which it actually is when your angle is wider so you can turn your horse and still hit the person) makes you more skilled or let's you chose from a wider range of your skills or whatever?
LOL
Actually the harder it is the more skills start shining through ;) If you can only shine when you can hit almost 180° from left to right, than you hardly misunderstood what skill means.
Imagine archers having autoaim or maybe heatseaking arrows. Would I be more skilled because I know how to shoot my heatseaking arrow to hit someone behind a house?^^
Btw, you are telling everyone here that they can't read or understand what you write and you presume people here don't read your posts.
Maybe you should start thinking about your posts? Probably writing them in a way people can understand?
Or maybe writing down what you actually think because you always say you didn't mean it the way you said it or whatever :/
Weird that all people here are misunderstanding you cause they are biased :/
you chose to quote one sentence of my response to someone else's statement about how a single cav cannot hope to beat 6 at once. Amazing how blind and biased people here can be.
Actually you misunderstood his statement. He said cav shouldn't be able to win such an encounter (except for the überpros), not that they cannot hope to win it.
You answered with "Usually I win such an encounter in native"
Well yes....
nativeShall we count how often people now told you it's not native here and that native is I don't know how many times more unbalanced and unrealstic than crpg?
