So what makes you think then a xbower with a normal xbow and a shield which is absolutely vulnerable while reloading with only mediocre damage is superior to a fast-ass shooting archer with Bodkins piercing your ass heavily?
Yeah hes superior, but only in melee, and even there he is slower than the archer fucking him up.
Range: Bow
Rate of Fire: Bow
Speed on Foot: Bow (most of the time)
Damage (per shot): Xbow (by a longshot)
Melee ability: Xbow by a mile (archers don't have spare points for real PS. No xbow build i've ever made had less than 6PS with plenty left over).
Armor Choice: Xbow
Upkeep: Xbow by a mile (i just respecced from archer to heavy cav and i'm actually paying
significantly less than any of my archer gens).
Accuracy: Toss up. (Xbow can aim all day for that headshot, archers can notch another arrow quickly and refire. Averages out).
Shield usage: Xbow
They both have pros and cons. The issue was that the guy claimed that ranged shouldn't have a decent melee and i pointed out xbowmen (and i forgot throwers) get ranged and melee ability
and shield usage should they choose. I'm not complaining its unbalanced, i'm saying that people take classes advantages in a bubble and forget the whole picture when trying to make comparisons.