Strategus wipe - new features - vote for your continent!

[Lt_Anders]

Of all those maps chadz's first one is my favorite.

But, but I like my chadz #1 rendition! It's cools and not unbalanced!

[Keshian]

But, but I like my chadz #1 rendition! It's cools and not unbalanced!

Don't forget, he's fallen and you dropped Ichamur.

[Braeden]

Zaffa, that doesn't really hold to the planned numbers.  There are, according to the poll, a lot more EU strat players, thus they get more land.

[Braeden]

Won't trade between EU and NA clans be possible?

It will, but its nice if it is possible to have your caravan stay where you can fight bandits at your best.  But yes, caravans across the line are entirely possible afaik.

I imagine it is a hard line, the border. No fighting and converting fiefs to your own timezone in this round of strat?

Nope.

[PhantomZero]

I would like to point out that in Picture #2 the village of "Mazigh" is actually a part of the desert.

Also I support option #2, because on the bottom, with the inclusion of terrain actually effecting things,  the terrain favors the defenders heavily. It would help further balance the issue between having a larger EU portion, with a smaller but more defensible NA portion.

[Vingnir the Wanderer]

Zaffa, that doesn't really hold to the planned numbers.  There are, according to the poll, a lot more EU strat players, thus they get more land.

I think the planned numbers may be a little off though - A.D.D. americans not reading the strat forums not voting.... I know I missed my vote lol.

I think the map should be slighty more 'even' between the 2 areas, than basing it solely on the vote numbers, as others have said, the NA may become overcrowded.

But I really dont know its just something to think about.

[Rev_zaffa]

Bit more inline with the numbers "based on total holdings"

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

NA
castles: 18
villages: 45
fiefs: 9
total holdings: 72

EU
castles: 28
villages: 61
fiefs: 13
total holdings: 102

[Bjarky]

I would like to point out that in Picture #2 the village of "Mazigh" is actually a part of the desert.

Also I support option #2, because on the bottom, with the inclusion of terrain actually effecting things,  the terrain favors the defenders heavily. It would help further balance the issue between having a larger EU portion, with a smaller but more defensible NA portion.

#1, LLJK can take the "white desert", vote for change 

[Centurion]

we're might use
1.

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

or
2.

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

i support pic number 1 from chadz i would rather be north than in the south

[Civilian]

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

(click to show/hide)

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Yea there ya go. I like this map MUCH more than all others. Pretty neat split.

Liking Anders rework of map #1.

[Centurion]

Liking Anders rework of map #1.

actually yea didnt see that one i like the that one more

[Karmazyn]

I feel strat without NA territory would be much more fun.

[SPQR]

I also vote for chadz Option 2. Better defensive terrain from the inevitable EU invasion.

[Lt_Anders]

actually yea didnt see that one i like the that one more

Kesh gave me the idea. Kesh really likes that map. I'm going to have to agree, (biased) I like that map. I think it'd work quite nicely.(/biased)

[Centurion]

Kesh gave me the idea. Kesh really likes that map. I'm going to have to agree, (biased) I like that map. I think it'd work quite nicely.(/biased)

eh if it was kesh's idea nvm then lol jk still is a good idea