didn't quite understand what he read
@ 1st Guy = I'm saying polearms get "Weapons" that can duel just as well as 2h's(read bec de corbin/poleaxes) + 300 length weapons, + shield usable WPP,
BTW 2h weapons usable on a horse use 1h WPP
Polearms have the best throwing weapons that use their wpp in "X" mode, hard coded Polestun, Pike and Poleaxe at same time, best on cav, best vs cav, shield usable WPP = unbalanced weapon category?
yes I understand the arguments against cav and throwing weapons that utilize 2h WPP and "Unbalanced" "2h" class weapons, but you can't just say "Thats Realism" and then say oh the rest just needs balance forget about that advantage over there, I mean its hardcoded we can't count that(....!)
...
...
@ Gorath- I understand a few 2h class weapons can carry an shield, however you must use 1h proficiency(at a 35% penalty to speed/damage)
.................
Polearm user can keep using his WPP, some weapons without a penalty, then without the shield if u say a Red Tassel or War Spear sucks, you are the one that has no skill I had no trouble killing with them.............
Also you seem to be ok with all the implicit advantages of Polearm but if the dueling Poleaxes became "Unsheathable" then for some reason all the advantages Polearms already have over other weapon classes become Nothing.....................I myself carry a pike with my 2h into battle
*******************